Cited by 14Aging and Gerontology ResearchRetirement, Disability, and EmploymentSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Self-reported ageism in students and academic staff—the case of the Social Work Department in Crete, Greece

Papadaki, Eleni, Plotnikof, Kyriaki, Papadaki, Vasileia·2012·European Journal of Social Work

Abstract

This study focuses on self-reported ageism among social work students and academic staff in the Social Work Department of Crete, Greece; the 20-item questionnaire Relating to Older People Evaluation (ROPE) was used to measure negative and positive ageist behaviours that respondents engage in during everyday life. Positive ways of relating to old people were reported much more often than the negative ways; no significant differences in mean endorsement scores between academic staff and undergraduate students in either the positive or the negative dimensions were found. Women endorsed positive ageism items more often than men did, but the two genders did not differ in their endorsement of negative ageism items. This association was observed both for the students and academic staff. For students, no relationship between how many years they had spent studying and endorsement score was observed for either the positive or the negative behaviour items. Social work students and academic staff should be aware that positive ageism may turn into paternalism; it is important that social work education prepares students in order to approach clients with a non-prejudiced attitude and to provide them with quality services.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13691457.2011.577410

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Papadaki, E., Plotnikof, K., & Papadaki, V.
Corresponding author
Papadaki, Eleni
Venue
European Journal of Social Work
Published
2012-11
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
696-711
ISSN
  • 1369-1457 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2664
OpenAlex
W1982595452
Cited by
14
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Journal of Social Work (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
ageism, social work students, university faculty, social work education, gender differences, paternalism, attitudes toward older adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review