Cited by 67Aging and Gerontology ResearchRetirement, Disability, and EmploymentSocial and Intergroup Psychology

Self-Reported Ageism in Social Work Practitioners and Students

Allen, Priscilla, Cherry, Katie, Palmore, Erdman·2009·Journal of Gerontological Social Work

Abstract

In this study, we focus on self-reported ageism in college students and social service providers using the Relating to Older People Evaluation (ROPE; Cherry & Palmore, 2008). The ROPE is a 20-item questionnaire that measures positive and negative ageist behaviors that people engage in during everyday life. Participants included undergraduate and graduate social work students and practicing social service providers in the nursing home and mental health setting. Findings indicate that people of varying educational backgrounds and occupational experience in social services readily admit to positive ageist behaviors. Item analyses revealed similarities and differences between groups in the most and least frequent forms of ageism endorsed. Ageism as a social phenomenon with implications related to social work policy and practice is discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01634370802561927

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People are more likely to admit positive ageism compared to negative ageism.

    “Multiple studies have also found that people are more likely to admit positive ageism compared to negative ageism, which may explain the association between social desirability and self-reported ageism questionnaires (Allen, Cherry, & Palmore, 2009; Cherry et al., 2015; Papadaki, Plotnikof, & Papadaki, 2011).”

    From Correlates of dementia-related anxiety: self-perceived dementia risk and ageism (2020) · cites this paper as Allen, Cherry, & Palmore, 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Allen, P., Cherry, K., & Palmore, E.
Affiliations
  • Louisiana State University (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Allen, Priscilla
Venue
Journal of Gerontological Social Work
Published
2009-02
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
124-134
ISSN
0163-4372 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2124979176
Cited by
67
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Gerontological Social Work (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
Keywords
ageism, social work students, social service providers, attitudes toward older adults, nursing homes, mental health services, educational background, occupational experience
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Educational Status, Female, Geriatrics, Homes for the Aged, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Nursing Homes, Prejudice, Social Work, Students, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review