The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Migrant categorizations and European public opinion: diverging attitudes towards immigrants and refugees
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, European media and public discourse have been increasingly categorising newcomers using terminology like ‘immigrants’ and ‘refugees’. The aim of this practice is to distinguish legitimate from illegitimate newcomers in the wake of the 2015 ‘refugee crisis’ in Europe. Drawing on data from an online survey in Belgium, France, the Netherlands and Sweden (n = 6000) in September and October of 2017, this article investigates how the use of these categories relates to public opinion on ‘immigrants’ and ‘refugees’. Findings show that people hold more positive attitudes towards ‘refugees’ than towards ‘immigrants’, a process which is likely driven by media framing. Attitude discrepancies within ‘immigrant’ and ‘refugee’ categories are also investigated, as categorical fetishism causes further differentiation of attitudes within these groups. Public opinion differences within ‘immigrants’ and ‘refugees’ are found along three cleavages: ethnicity, the economic situation of the origin country, and region of origin. Newcomers with the same ethnicity (vs. a different ethnicity), from ‘rich’ countries (vs. ‘poor’ countries), and from European countries (vs. non-European countries) are preferred in both categories. With these findings, this article reveals important aspects of the influence of migrant categorizations on public opinion towards vulnerable groups of newcomers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Dempster & Hargrave (2017) find that studies across a variety of countries have historically shown a distinction between attitudes toward those recognized as refugees and toward other types of migrants, with a general preference for recognized refugees (but not asylum seekers; see also De Coninck 2020).”
From Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants (2021) · cites this paper as De Coninck 2020
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Social psychology of intergroup relations
Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (1979) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,577
Multilevel analysis techniques and applications
Hox, J. J., Moerbeek, M., & van de Schoot, R. (2002) · Cited by 6,006
Security, territory, population: lectures at the College de France, 1977-78
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-1971 · Cited by 3,491
Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research
Hill, R. J., Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2065853 · Cited by 2,379
The uses of mass communications : current perspectives on gratifications research
Katz, E., & Blumler, J. G. (1975) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,111
Security, Territory, Population
Senellart, M., Ewald, F., & Fontana, A. (2009) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230245075 · Cited by 1,822
Hox, J. J., Moerbeek, M., & van de Schoot, R. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315650982 · Cited by 1,723
Public Attitudes Toward Immigration
Hainmueller, J., & Hopkins, D. J. (2014) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-102512-194818 · Cited by 1,706
Intergroup Threat and Outgroup Attitudes: A Meta-Analytic Review
Riek, B. M., Mania, E. W., & Gaertner, S. L. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_4 · Cited by 1,588 · cited 1×
“This is defined as the perceived harm by immigrants or refugees with distinct values, norms, and beliefs, and is a major source of prejudice (Zárate et al. 2004; Riek, Mania, and Gaertner 2006; Ata, Bastian, and Lusher 2009).”
BackgroundWho Is Against Immigration? A Cross-Country Investigation of Individual Attitudes toward Immigrants
Mayda, A. M. (2006) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest.88.3.510 · Cited by 1,430
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Augoustinos M., 2001, Representations of the Social, 201
- Haslam S. A., 2001, Psychology in Organisations: The Social Identity Approach
- Lawlor A., 2017, International Journal of Communication, 11, 967
- Wieviorka M., 2018, Europe’s Crises, 205
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants
Esses, V. M. (2021) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-080520-102803 · Cited by 344
The Refugee Paradox During Wartime in Europe: How Ukrainian and Afghan Refugees are (not) Alike
De Coninck, D. (2023) · International Migration Review · doi:10.1177/01979183221116874 · Cited by 240
Coninck, D. D., Rodríguez‐de‐Dios, I., & d’Haenens, L. (2020) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430220929394 · Cited by 123
Findor, A., Hruška, M., Jankovská, P., & Pobudová, M. (2020) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2020.12.004 · Cited by 56
Coninck, D. D., & Matthijs, K. (2020) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2020.05.004 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- De Coninck, D.
- Affiliations
- Centre for Sociological Research, KU Leuven, Belgium
- ORCID
- De Coninck, David
- Venue
- Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-11-21
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1667-1686
- ISSN
- 1369-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9451
- OpenAlex
- W2991438502
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8
- FWCI
- 21.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- lirias.kuleuven.be
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies (publishedVersion)
- Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Belgian Federal Science Policy Office (BR/165/A4/IMMEDIATE, BR/165/A4)
- KU Leuven
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Law › Migration, Racism, and Human Rights
- Keywords
- migrant categorization, public opinion on immigrants, attitudes toward refugees, 2015 refugee crisis, media framing, region of origin, Belgium, France, Netherlands, Sweden
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
