Cited by 86Climate Change and GeoengineeringSustainability and Climate Change GovernanceEnvironmental Philosophy and Ethics

Sleepwalking into lock-in? Avoiding wrongs to future people in the governance of solar radiation management research

McKinnon, Catriona·2019·Environmental Politics

Abstract

Arguments are advanced for two ways in which we can avoid the reckless endangerment of future people in the governance of solar radiation management (SRM) research, which could happen through lock-in to SRM deployment from research. SRM research is at an early stage, one at which the mechanisms of lock-in could start to operate. However, lock-in fit to endanger future people could be slowed or stopped through targeted governance. Governance of SRM research that does not include provisions to detect, slow, or stop lock-in fails the test of an intergenerationally adequate precautionary principle, and research governed without these provisions cannot itself be justified as a precaution against the impacts of climate change.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09644016.2018.1450344

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 83 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McKinnon, C.
Affiliations
University of Reading (GB)
Corresponding author
McKinnon, Catriona
Venue
Environmental Politics
Published
2018-03-23
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
441-459
ISSN
  • 0964-4016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-8934
OpenAlex
W2785294633
Cited by
86
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 3
FWCI
6.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Politics (publishedVersion)
  • CentAUR (University of Reading) (acceptedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Geoengineering
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
Keywords
solar radiation management, research governance, lock-in, future generations, intergenerational justice, precautionary principle, climate change mitigation, geoengineering, research ethics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review