The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Researching risk and the media
Abstract
The media are crucial players in the construction of, and communication about, risk. Yet their role is often under-theorised, and sometimes misrepresented or parodied. In particular, the media are accused of routine sensationalism. Journalists are blamed for exaggerating risk, ‘whipping up hysteria’ and distorting reality. Academic studies of the media, however, suggest a more complex picture. The first half of this article reflects on the theoretical and methodological considerations which inform studies of ‘risk reporting’ and highlights some of the key questions when designing or assessing such research. The second half of the article draws out some common findings about how ‘risk reporting’ operates, focusing, in particular, on what we know about ‘news values’ and media production processes. It outlines the factors influencing media coverage of risk: from the organisation and resources of different source agencies through to the news gathering routines of journalists, and reflects on the ‘cultural givens’ which inform representations of diverse hazards.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hobson‐West, P. (2007) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.00544.x · Cited by 259
Natural hazards knowledge and risk perception of Wujie indigenous community in Taiwan
Roder, G., Ruljigaljig, T., Lin, C.-W., & Tarolli, P. (2016) · Natural Hazards · doi:10.1007/s11069-015-2100-4 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Kitzinger, J.
- Venue
- Health, Risk & Society
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-69
- ISSN
- 1369-8575 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8331
- OpenAlex
- W2125435725
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Researching risk and the media. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/13698579908407007
- The paper
- Kitzinger, J. (1999). Researching risk and the media. Health, Risk & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698579908407007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.