Cited by 6Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesHealth Policy Implementation SciencePsychiatric care and mental health services

Clinician Perspectives on Suicide Safety Planning and Its Implementation

Open access
Haroz, Emily E., Bajaj, Mira A., Nestadt, Paul S., Campo, John V., Wilcox, Holly C.·2025·Archives of Suicide Research

Abstract

Objective The safety planning intervention is an evidence-based practice shown to reduce suicide risk, but implementation of high-quality safety planning has proven challenging. We aimed to understand clinician perspectives on the safety planning intervention to inform future implementation efforts.Method This cross-sectional survey of clinicians who care for patients at risk of suicide in an academic medical center asked about comfort levels and fidelity to components of the safety planning intervention and assessed implementation barriers and facilitators. We used exploratory data analysis and regression analysis to explore clinician perspectives and assess the relationship between formal training and implementation.Results Ninety-two clinicians responded to the survey. Two-thirds of participants (64.9%) endorsed using all six core elements of the safety planning intervention. Participants who reported receiving formal training in safety planning were significantly more likely to report being comfortable completing a safety plan (p < .001); those with higher levels of comfort were significantly more likely to endorse using all of the core elements of the safety planning intervention (p < .001).Conclusions Training in the evidence-based safety planning intervention is associated with clinician comfort and awareness of the core elements of the intervention. Our results suggest that there are gaps in clinician training and that formal safety planning intervention training could have a positive effect on clinician comfort and treatment fidelity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13811118.2024.2370852

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Differential effectiveness of treatment by patient age has been noted for other interventions, including pharmacological treatments, with potentially harmful effects for pediatric populations.

    “A differential effectiveness of treatment by patient age has similarly been noted for other interventions, including pharmacological treatments, with potentially harmful effects for pediatric populations48,49”

    From Safety Planning Interventions for Suicide Prevention in Children and Adolescents (2025) · cites this paper as [48]

    The Results describe clinicians who care for pediatric and adult patients, and the Discussion addresses safety-planning training, but neither reports treatment effectiveness by patient age. Searches for pharmacological treatments, antidepressants, and pediatric harms found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Damschroder LJ, & Lowery JC (2013). Evaluation of a large-scale weight management program using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR). Implementation Science: IS, 8, 51. 10.1186/1748-5908-8-51 23663819 PMC3656778 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Stone DM, Mack KA, & Qualters J. (2023). Notes from the Field: Recent Changes in Suicide Rates, by Race and Ethnicity and Age Group - United States, 2021. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 72(6), 160– 162. 10.15585/mmwr.mm7206a4 36757870 PMC9925140 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haroz, E. E., Bajaj, M. A., Nestadt, P. S., Campo, J. V., & Wilcox, H. C.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Haroz, Emily E.
Venue
Archives of Suicide Research
Published
2024-07
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
501-511
ISSN
  • 1381-1118 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-6136
OpenAlex
W4400202729
Cited by
6
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Suicide Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K01MH116335)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
suicide prevention, implementation barriers and facilitators, clinician comfort, intervention fidelity, clinician training, suicide risk
MeSH terms
Academic Medical Centers, Suicide Prevention, Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review