Cited by 88Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPsychiatric care and mental health servicesEmergency and Acute Care Studies

An Emergency Department Intervention and Follow-Up to Reduce Suicide Risk in the VA: Acceptability and Effectiveness

Open access
Stanley, Barbara, Chaudhury, Sadia R., Chesin, Megan, Pontoski, Kristin, Bush, Ashley Mahler, Knox, Kerry L., Brown, Gregory K.·2016·Psychiatric Services

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Emergency departments (EDs) are often the primary contact point for suicidal individuals. The post-ED visit period is a high suicide risk time. To address the need for support during this time, a novel intervention was implemented in five Department of Veterans Affairs medical center EDs. The intervention combined the Safety Planning Intervention (SPI) with structured follow-up and monitoring (SFU) by telephone for suicidal individuals who did not require hospitalization. This study assessed the intervention's acceptability and perceived usefulness. METHODS: A selected sample of 100 intervention participants completed a semistructured interview consisting of open-ended questions about the intervention's acceptability, usefulness, and helpfulness. Satisfaction with the SPI and SFU was separately evaluated. RESULTS: Nearly all participants found the SAFE VET intervention to be acceptable, reporting that it was helpful in preventing further suicidal behavior and fostering treatment engagement. CONCLUSIONS: The SAFE VET intervention showed promise as an ED intervention for suicidal patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ps.201500082

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stanley, B., Chaudhury, S. R., Chesin, M., Pontoski, K., Bush, A. M., Knox, K. L., & Brown, G. K.
Affiliations
  • Dr. Stanley and Dr. Chaudhury are with the Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York City (e-mail: ). They are also with the New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York City, where Dr. Chesin is affiliated. Dr. Chesin is also with the Department of Psychology, William Paterson University, Wayne, New Jersey. Dr. Pontoski, Ms. Bush, and Dr. Brown are with the Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia. Dr. Brown is also with the VISN 4 Mental Illness Research,...
  • William Paterson University (US)
Venue
Psychiatric Services
Published
2016-06-01
Volume
67
Issue
6
Pages
680-683
ISSN
  • 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1075-2730
  • 1557-9700
OpenAlex
W2261123320
Cited by
88
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7
FWCI
9.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Keywords
suicide risk, emergency department interventions, veterans, Safety Planning Intervention, telephone follow-up, suicide prevention, treatment acceptability, treatment engagement, post-discharge monitoring
MeSH terms
Suicide Prevention, Adult, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Ill-Housed Persons, Hospitals, Veterans, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Risk Factors, Telephone, United States, Veterans, Risk Reduction Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review