Cited by 15

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

ADAMTSL4 assessment in ectopia lentis reveals a recurrent founder mutation in Polynesians

van Bysterveldt, Katherine A., al Taie, Rasha, Ikink, Will, Oliver, Verity F., Vincent, Andrea L.·2017·Ophthalmic Genetics

Abstract

Background To clinically characterize a cohort of patients with ectopia lentis (EL), or Marfanoid features in whom a definite genetic diagnosis of Marfan syndrome (MFS) had been excluded (atypical MFS), and to evaluate the contribution of mutations in ADAMTSL4 (OMIM * 610113), and P3H2 (LEPREL1; OMIM * 610341) to disease in this population. Materials and methods Subjects underwent comprehensive ophthalmic examination, including keratometry. Mutational analysis of ADAMTSL4 and P3H2 was undertaken using PCR, high resolution melting analysis, and sequencing. The frequency of c.2237G>A; p.(Arg746His) was determined in an unaffected Polynesian cohort. Haplotype analysis used tagged single nucleotide polymorphic markers. Results Mutational analysis of ADAMTSL4 identified two pathogenic variants in ADAMTSL4 in 11/31 (35%) probands, consistent with the autosomal recessive EL phenotype. A recurrent, rare missense variant in ADAMTSL4, c.2237G>A; p.(Arg746His), was present in 10 probands -(8 homozygotes), predominantly of Polynesian descent, and all shared the same haplotype. p.(Arg746His) affects the Thrombospondin1 (TSP1) domain of the protein and is predicted to be pathogenic. No pathogenic variants in P3H2 were identified. Conclusion A recurrent pathogenic ADAMTSL4 variant is a major cause of early onset autosomal recessive EL in a Cook Island Māori population and associated with a common haplotype, suggesting a founder effect. Children presenting under the age of 5 years, particula…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13816810.2017.1309552

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. 10.1038/eye.2013.274 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/352337a0 · DOI
  3. 10.1167/iovs.12-9874 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/humu.21305 · DOI
  5. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19960424)62:4<417::AID-AJMG15>3.0.CO;2-R · DOI
  6. 10.1136/jmg.2009.072785 · DOI
  7. 10.1076/opge.24.1.35.13892 · DOI
  8. 10.1006/geno.1994.1110 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/nar/16.3.1215 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/nature15393 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1038/nmeth0410-248 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1038/nmeth.2890 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1038/nprot.2009.86 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1101/gr.176601 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1167/iovs.10-5597 · DOI
  16. 10.1167/iovs.10-5740 · DOI
  17. 10.3109/13816810.2012.710707 · DOI
  18. 10.1167/iovs.10-5955 · DOI
  19. Neuhann TM, Am J Med Genet A
  20. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0040019 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1038/jhg.2012.19 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.01.028 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 15

Metadata

Authors
van Bysterveldt, K. A., al Taie, R., Ikink, W., Oliver, V. F., & Vincent, A. L.
Affiliations
Department of Ophthalmology, FMHS, New Zealand National Eye Centre, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
Venue
Ophthalmic Genetics
Published
2017-04-10
Volume
38
Issue
6
Pages
537-543
ISSN
  • 1381-6810
  • 1744-5094
Cited by
15
References
1
Language
en
Funders
  • University of Auckland (Summer Studentship award)
  • Save Sight Society of New Zealand (N/A)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review