The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Aging and Response Inhibition: Normative Data for the Victoria Stroop Test
Abstract
Increased difficulty with response inhibition occurs with age, although there is some controversy as to whether increased interference on Stroop tasks reflects difficulties with response inhibition or simply reflects generalized cognitive slowing. The Victoria Stroop Test (VST) is a brief, easily administered, psychometrically sound version of Stroop's original task. Performance on the VST by adults across a wide age span was examined to determine the association between age and various measures of interference. In addition, normative data for the VST were calculated. Participants were 272 healthy, community-dwelling adults age 18 to 94. Age and speed were negatively correlated on all trials of the VST. Importantly, however, interference scores that were corrected for baseline slowing remained highly correlated with age. Similarly, age and error scores on the interference trial were positively correlated, indicating decreased accuracy with age. These findings suggest that increased interference on Stroop tasks with age is not accounted for by simple cognitive slowing and more likely reflects other cognitive changes, such as decreased response inhibition. The VST has a number of administrative and psychometric strengths, and the provision of normative data should enhance its potential for clinical and research applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions
Stroop, J. R. (1935) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0054651 · Cited by 18,622
Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.1.47 · Cited by 1,725 · cited 1×
“This interference may reflect difficulties in a number of areas: (a) a decreased ability to disengage from the dominant reading response, (b) an increased tendency to respond impulsively, and/or (c) a failure to maintain the task goal of ignoring the word dimension ( Kane & Engle, 2003 ).”
Background
Cited by
The stroop color and word test
Scarpina, F., & Tagini, S. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00557 · Cited by 1,661
Working memory training in older adults: Evidence of transfer and maintenance effects.
Borella, E., Carretti, B., Riboldi, F., & De Beni, R. (2010) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0020683 · Cited by 328
Neural correlates of fatigue after traumatic brain injury
Anliker, A. E., Chauvigné, L. A. S., Allaman, L., & Guggisberg, A. G. (2025) · Brain Communications · doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcaf082 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Troyer, A. K., Leach, L., & Strauss, E.
- Venue
- Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 20-35
- ISSN
- 0928-9917 (ISSN-L)
- 1382-5585
- 1744-4128
- OpenAlex
- W1976805665
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 2.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.