Cited by 328Cognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive Functions and MemoryAging and Gerontology Research

Working memory training in older adults: Evidence of transfer and maintenance effects.

Borella, Erika, Carretti, Barbara, Riboldi, Francesco, De Beni, Rossana·2010·Psychology and Aging

Abstract

Few studies have examined working memory (WM) training-related gains and their transfer and maintenance effects in older adults. This present research investigates the efficacy of a verbal WM training program in adults aged 65-75 years, considering specific training gains on a verbal WM (criterion) task as well as transfer effects on measures of visuospatial WM, short-term memory, inhibition, processing speed, and fluid intelligence. Maintenance of training benefits was evaluated at 8-month follow-up. Trained older adults showed higher performance than did controls on the criterion task and maintained this benefit after 8 months. Substantial general transfer effects were found for the trained group, but not for the control one. Transfer maintenance gains were found at follow-up, but only for fluid intelligence and processing speed tasks. The results are discussed in terms of cognitive plasticity in older adults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0020683

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is no consensus on transfer to inhibitory control measures, with some WM training studies reporting benefits and others not.

    “there is no consensus regarding transfer to inhibitory control measures, with some WM training studies reporting training-related benefits59,60,71,72, yet others failing to find evidence of transfer51,73.”
  • Transfer to sequencing and/or complex WM tasks has been reported by some N-back training studies but not others.

    “Transfer to sequencing and/or complex WM tasks has been reported by some57–63, but not other N-back training studies58,64–70.”
  • Training effects can go beyond the trained domain and show benefits in measures considerably different from the training task if they are associated with the trained process and share comparable neural circuits (far transfer).

    “Furthermore, training effects could go beyond the trained domain and show benefits in measures considerably different from the training task, as long as they were associated with the trained process and shared comparable neural circuits (far transfer) (Jaeggi et al., 2008; Borella et al., 2010; Loosli et al., 2012; Dahlin, 2013).”

    From Training on Working Memory and Inhibitory Control in Young Adults (2016) · cites this paper as Borella et al., 2010

  • Training procedures targeting specific cognitive abilities allow more restricted attributions on training-derived transfer effects than complex procedures that include multiple cognitive domains.

    “training procedures targeting specific cognitive abilities (such as WM or IC) allow for more restricted attributions on training-derived transfer effects (Borella et al., 2010; Rueda et al., 2012; Jaeggi et al., 2013) than complex procedures that include multiple cognitive domains”

    From Training on Working Memory and Inhibitory Control in Young Adults (2016) · cites this paper as Borella et al., 2010

  • Several studies have demonstrated positive effects of WM training in different age groups with transfer to trained and untrained domains such as mathematical performance.

    “Several studies have demonstrated positive effects of WM training in different age groups (Borella et al., 2010; Söderqvist et al., 2012; Jaeggi et al., 2013) with transfer to trained and untrained domains such as mathematical performance”

    From Training on Working Memory and Inhibitory Control in Young Adults (2016) · cites this paper as Borella et al., 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Borella, E., Carretti, B., Riboldi, F., & De Beni, R.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Venue
Psychology and Aging
Published
2010
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
767-778
ISSN
  • 0882-7974 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1498
OpenAlex
W2118934714
Cited by
328
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 17
FWCI
18.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology and Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
working memory training, older adults, transfer effects, verbal working memory, visuospatial working memory, short-term memory, inhibition, processing speed, fluid intelligence, cognitive plasticity
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Memory, Short-Term, Mental Recall, Teaching, Transfer, Psychology, Stroop Test

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review