The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Criterion Validity of the WAIS-IV Cognitive Proficiency Index (CPI)
Abstract
Objective The current study sought to validate the Cognitive Proficiency Index (CPI) against similar, well-established measures of attention and processing speed. Additionally, the sensitivity of the CPI and Attention Index of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) and their ability to differentiate among clinical groups were compared. Method The first objective was accomplished by calculating correlation coefficients between the CPI and similar attention and processing speed measures. The second objective was accomplished using a clinical group of 25 individuals with Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) scores of less than or equal to 23 matched to a non-clinical group of 43 participants with MMSE scores of 30, all derived from the original sample. Results The CPI correlated in expected ways with other measures of attention and processing speed (magnitude of r = .19-.77). ANCOVA, receiver operating characteristic, and discriminant function analyses suggested that the CPI is superior to the RBANS Attention Index in differentiating between clinical and non-clinical groups. Conclusions These findings provide support for convergent validity and criterion-related concurrent validity for the CPI.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The role of the CPI as a predictor of clinical-group membership and a discriminator between presentations makes it a particularly useful indicator when behavioral symptomatology is ambiguous or when discrepancies arise between informants.
“Likewise, the role of the CPI as a predictor of clinical-group membership and a discriminator between presentations makes it a particularly useful indicator when behavioral symptomatology is ambiguous or when discrepancies arise between informants (family-school) [29, 57].”
From ADHD, Subtypes and Cognitive Performance: WISC-V as a Support Tool for Diagnostic Assessment (2026) · cites this paper as [57]
Citations
Cites
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-3338 · Cited by 35,305
DeLong, E. R., DeLong, D. M., & Clarke-Pearson, D. L. (1988) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531595 · Cited by 22,649
Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000) · doi:10.1002/0471722146 · Cited by 20,302
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-III
Ryan, J. J., & Lopez, S. J. (2001) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-1185-4_2 · Cited by 3,680
Hays, W. (1983) · Contemporary Psychology · doi:10.1037/022267 · Cited by 2,399
Paced Auditory Serial-Addition Task: A Measure of Recovery from Concussion
Gronwall, D. M. A. (1977) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1977.44.2.367 · Cited by 2,395 · cited 4×
“…1998), Trail Making Test (TMT; Heaton, Miller, Taylor, & Grant, 2004; Reitan & Wolfston, 1985), Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT; Gronwall, 1977), Dementia Rating Scale (DRS-2; Jurica, Leitten, & Mattis, 2001), written and oral Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT; Smith, 1991),…”
MethodInfluentialWechsler Adult Intelligence Scale
(2007) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412952644.n478 · Cited by 2,017
Palandri, F., Breccia, M., Bonifacio, M., Polverelli, N., Elli, E. M., Benevolo, G., Tiribelli, M., Abruzzese, E., Iurlo, A., Heidel, F. H., et al. (2006) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/(issn)1097-0142 · Cited by 1,477
Smith, A. (1973) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t27513-000 · Cited by 1,314
Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery
(2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/springerreference_180120 · Cited by 755
Derakshan, N., & Eysenck, M. W. (2009) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027/1016-9040.14.2.168 · Cited by 710
Duff, K. M., Humphreys‐Clark, J. D., O’Bryant, S. E., Mold, J. W., Schiffer, R. B., & Sutker, P. B. (2008) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1016/j.acn.2008.06.004 · Cited by 236
Conners’ Continuous Performance Test
Folsom, R., & Levin, P. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-91280-6_216 · Cited by 225
Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS)
Gontkovsky, S. T. (2023) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781529789539.n34 · Cited by 199
Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery
Hussey, J., & Allen, D. N. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_189 · Cited by 131
Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children
Luiselli, J., Happe, F. G. E., Hurst, H., et al. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1698-3_101554 · Cited by 118
Differences in the intellectual profile of children with intellectual vs. learning disability
Cornoldi, C., Giofrè, D., Orsini, A., & Pezzuti, L. (2014) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.05.013 · Cited by 95
Advanced Clinical Interpretation of WISC-IV Index Scores
Weiss, L. G., Schwartz, D. M., Prifitera, A., Courville, T., & Saklofske, D. H. (2006) · WISC-IV Advanced Clinical Interpretation · doi:10.1016/b978-012088763-7/50005-x · Cited by 66
Cognitive efficiency: A conceptual and methodological comparison
Hoffman, B. H. (2011) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.09.001 · Cited by 56
Montori, V. M. (2005) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.1031666 · Cited by 53
Theoretical, Empirical and Clinical Foundations of the WAIS-IV Index Scores
Weiss, L. G., Saklofske, D. H., Coalson, D. L., & Raiford, S. E. (2010) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-375035-8.10003-5 · Cited by 28
Levan, A. J., Baxter, L. C., Kirwan, C. B., Black, G. M., & Gale, S. D. (2014) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/htr.0000000000000040 · Cited by 20
Overview of the WAIS–IV/WMS–IV/ACS
Drozdick, L. W., Holdnack, J. A., Weiss, L. G., & Zhou, X. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-386934-0.00001-8 · Cited by 17
Using the WAIS–IV/WMS–IV/ACS Following Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
Iverson, G. L., Holdnack, J. A., & Lange, R. T. (2013) · WAIS-IV, WMS-IV, and ACS · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-386934-0.00010-9 · Cited by 14
Assessing Cognition in Older Adults with the WAIS–IV, WMS–IV, and ACS
Drozdick, L. W., Holdnack, J. A., Salthouse, T. A., & Cullum, C. M. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-386934-0.00009-2 · Cited by 10
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- 10.1016/j.learninstr.2011.09.001 · DOI
- Jurica P. J., 2001, Dementia Rating Scale-2: Professional manual
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Examining the Cognitive Proficiency Index in rehabilitation patients
Rolin, S. N., Mullen, C. M., Vaccariello, E. D., & Davis, J. J. (2019) · Applied Neuropsychology Adult · doi:10.1080/23279095.2019.1666269 · Cited by 2
ADHD, Subtypes and Cognitive Performance: WISC-V as a Support Tool for Diagnostic Assessment
Lavigne-Cerván, R., Collado-Valero, J., Navarro-Soria, I., Rosales-Gómez, M., & Torrecillas-Martínez, M. (2026) · Actas Espanolas de Psiquiatria · doi:10.62641/aep.v54i3.2122 · Cited by 1
Ekdahl, N., Lannsjö, M., Stålnacke, B., & Möller, M. C. (2025) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2025.2517240 · Cited by 1
Campbell, C. E., Rossini, E. D., & Johnson, M. S. (2022) · Applied Neuropsychology Adult · doi:10.1080/23279095.2022.2146505
Factor analysis of neuropsychological attention measures with mild traumatic brain injury patients
Mateer, E. M., Erickson, T. M., Jin, J., Glisky, M. L., & Asgarian, A. (2025) · Applied Neuropsychology Adult · doi:10.1080/23279095.2025.2566749
Metadata
- Authors
- Logue, E., Scarisbrick, D. M., Thaler, N. S., Mahoney, J. J., Block, C. K., Adams, R., & Scott, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (US)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- University of Virginia (US)
- Memorial Hermann Institute for Rehabilitation and Research Foundation (US)
- Corresponding author
- Logue, Erin
- Venue
- The Clinical Neuropsychologist
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-08-18
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 777-787
- ISSN
- 0920-1637 (ISSN-L)
- 1385-4046
- 1744-4144
- OpenAlex
- W2180398790
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Clinical Neuropsychologist (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- WAIS-IV, criterion validity, convergent validity, attention, processing speed, cognitive impairment, Mini-Mental State Examination, discriminant validity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attention, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychometrics, Wechsler Scales, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
