Cited by 49Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsEpistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsPhilosophical Ethics and Theory

Does reflection lead to wise choices?

Open access
Bortolotti, Lisa·2011·Philosophical Explorations

Abstract

Does conscious reflection lead to good decision-making? Whereas engaging in reflection is traditionally thought to be the best way to make wise choices, recent psychological evidence undermines the role of reflection in lay and expert judgement. The literature suggests that thinking about reasons does not improve the choices people make, and that experts do not engage in reflection, but base their judgements on intuition, often shaped by extensive previous experience. Can we square the traditional accounts of wisdom with the results of these empirical studies? Should we even attempt to? I shall defend the view that philosophy and cognitive sciences genuinely interact in tackling questions such as whether reflection leads to making wise choices.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13869795.2011.594962

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DoT can result from bias and distorted perception, rigidity and resistance to change, and limited external feedback.

    “There are various factors (Bortolotti, 2011;Keestra, 2017) that could result in DoT, and we outline three here: (1) Bias and Distorted Perception.”

    From Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debate (2024) · cites this paper as Bortolotti, 2011

    In “Decision-making and self-knowledge” (page not provided), Bortolotti says reflective deliberation may be manipulated by biased evidence and may overlook factors relevant to a choice, supporting the bias and distorted-perception factor. The passages do not identify rigidity, resistance to change, or limited external feedback as factors. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Baltes P. Smith J. Steinberg R. Towards a psychology of wisdom and its ontogenesis Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development 1990 New York Cambridge University Press 87 120
  2. Bauer J. McAdams D. Pals J. Narrative identity and eudaimonic well-being Journal of Happiness Studies 2008 9 81 104
  3. Birren J. Fischer L. Steinberg R. The elements of wisdom: Overview and integration Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development 1990 New York Cambridge University Press 317 32
  4. Bortolotti L. Cox R. ‘Faultless’ ignorance: Strengths and limitations of epistemic definitions of confabulation Consciousness and Cognition 2009 18 4 952 65 19773185
  5. Bortolotti L. Cox R. Broome M. Mameli M. Radoilska L. Rationality and self-knowledge in delusions and confabulations: Implications for autonomy as self-governance Autonomy and mental illness Oxford Oxford University Press
  6. Burton C.M. King L.A. The health benefits of writing about intensely positive experiences Journal of Research in Personality 2004 38 2 150 63
  7. Dijksterhuis A. van Olden Z. On the benefits of thinking unconsciously: Unconscious thought can increase post-choice satisfaction Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2006 42 627 31
  8. Dreyfus H.L. Dreyfus S.E. Mind over machine: The power of human intuitive expertise in the era of the computer 1986 New York Free Press
  9. Gerrans P. Broome M.R. Bortolotti L. Mad scientists or unreliable autobiographers? Dopamine dysregulation and delusion Psychiatry as cognitive neuroscience: Philosophical perspectives 2009 Oxford Oxford University Press
  10. Gigerenzer G. Gut feelings: The intelligence of the unconscious 2007 New York Penguin Books
  11. Gigerenzer G. Todd P. the ABC Research Groups Simple heuristics that make us smart 1999 New York Oxford University Press
  12. Gilovich T. Griffin D.W. Kahneman D. Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgement 2002 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
  13. Haidt J. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment Psychological Review 2001 108 814 34 11699120
  14. Hamilton E. Cairns H. Collected dialogues of Plato 1978 Princeton Princeton University Press
  15. Hertwig R. Gigerenzer G. The conjunction fallacy revisited: How intelligent inferences look like reasoning errors Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 1999 12 275 305
  16. Kahneman D. Slovic P. Tversky A. Judgements under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases 1982 Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press
  17. Kennett J. Matthews S. Broome M.R. Bortolotti L. Mental time travel, agency and responsibility Psychiatry as cognitive neuroscience: Philosophical perspectives 2009 Oxford Oxford University Press
  18. March J. Simon H. Organizations 1993 Cambridge, MA Blackwell
  19. McAdams D. John O.P. Robins R.W. Pervin L.A. Personal narratives and the life story Handbook of personality: Theory and research 2008 3rd ed New York Guildford Press
  20. Meacham J. Sternberg R. The loss of wisdom Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development 1990 New York Cambridge University Press
  21. Nee C. Meenaghan A. Expert decision making in burglars British Journal of Criminology 2006 46 935 49
  22. Nisbett R.E. Wilson T.D. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes Psychological Review 1977 84 3 231 59
  23. Nussbaum M.C. The fragility of goodness: Luck and ethics in Greek tragedy and philosophy (2nd ed) 2001 New York Cambridge University Press
  24. Osbeck L. Robinson D. Sternberg R. Jordan J. Philosophical theories of wisdom A handbook of wisdom: Psychological perspectives 2005 Cambridge Cambridge University Press 61 83
  25. Pennebaker J. Seagal J. Forming a story: The health benefits of a narrative Journal of Clinical Psychology 1999 55 10 1243 254 11045774
  26. Sternberg R. Lubart T. Birren E. Shale K. Wisdom and creativity Handbook of the psychology of aging 2001 New York Academic Press 500 22
  27. Stone T. Davies M. Cognitive neuropsychology and the philosophy of mind British Journal of Philosophy of Science 1993 44 589 622
  28. Sutton J. McIlwain D. Christensen W. Geeves A. Applying intelligence to the reflexes: Embodied skills and habits between Dreyfus and Descartes Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 2011 42 1 78 103
  29. Tiberius V. Reflective wisdom: Living wisely with our limits 2008 Oxford Oxford University Press
  30. Velleman D. Self to self 2006 New York Cambridge University Press
  31. Wheeler M. Reconstructing the cognitive world: The next step 2005 Cambridge, MA MIT Press
  32. Wilson T. Strangers to ourselves 2002 Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press
  33. Wilson T. Dunn E. Self-knowledge: Its limits, value, and potential for improvement Annual Review of Psychology 2004 55 493 518 14744224
  34. Wilson T. Kraft D. Why do I love thee? Effects of repeated introspections about a dating relationship on attitudes toward the relationship Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1993 19 409 18
  35. Wilson T. Hodges S. LaFleur S. Effects of introspecting about reasons: Inferring attitudes from accessible thoughts Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1995 69 16 28 7643298
  36. Wilson T. Dunn D. Bybee J. Hyman D. Rotondo J. Effects of analyzing reasons on attitude-behavior consistency Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1984 47 5 16

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bortolotti, L.
Affiliations
University of Birmingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Bortolotti, Lisa
Venue
Philosophical Explorations
Published
2011-09
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
297-313
ISSN
  • 1386-9795 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-5918
OpenAlex
W2063288340
Cited by
49
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Explorations (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Institutional Research Archive (University of Birmingham) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Ferrara (University of Ferrara) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Keywords
reflection, decision-making, wisdom, intuition, expert opinion, philosophy of cognitive science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review