The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Three Worlds of Welfare Chauvinism? How Welfare Regimes Affect Support for Distributing Welfare to Immigrants in Europe
Open accessAbstract
Analyzing the 2008 wave of the European Social Survey, this study assesses whether an elaborate institutional theory is able to explain why levels of welfare chauvinism differ among welfare regimes. As expected, native populations in liberal and conservative welfare regimes prove more reluctant to distributing welfare services to immigrants than those in social-democratic ones. Adding country-level data, it is demonstrated that neither differences in the selectivity nor differences in employment protection and unemployment levels can explain these varying levels of welfare chauvinism. Instead, regime differences in welfare chauvinism can be fully attributed to their differences in income inequality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Various scholars have shown that this dynamic, and its pernicious effects on immigrants, is diminished in more universalistic welfare states (Van der Waal, De Koster & Van Oorschot, 2013; Larsen, 2006; Swank & Betz, 2003; Van Oorschot, 2000; Kumlin & Rothstein 2010; Rothstein 2015).”
From Solidarity in diverse societies: beyond neoliberal multiculturalism and welfare chauvinism (2015) · cites this paper as Van der Waal, De Koster & Van Oorschot, 2013
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We know that deservingness judgements are ' primed ' when the welfare state is organized on a more selective basis, using means-tested benefits, which makes recipients more visible, and invites -indeed almost requires -debates about their deservingness.”
From Solidarity in diverse societies: beyond neoliberal multiculturalism and welfare chauvinism (2015) · cites this paper as Van der Waal, De Koster & Van Oorschot, 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The three worlds of welfare capitalism
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-1046 · Cited by 16,528
Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models
Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790942 · Cited by 13,597
The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism
Hicks, A., & Esping-Andersen, G. (1991) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2073705 · Cited by 7,092
Citizenship and Social Class: And Other Essays.
Fiddle, S., & Marshall, T. H. (1951) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2087636 · Cited by 3,218
Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe
Alesina, A., & Glaeser, E. L. (2004) · doi:10.1093/0199267669.001.0001 · Cited by 1,500
Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State
Rothstein, B. (1998) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511598449 · Cited by 1,403
van Oorschot, W. (2006) · Journal of European Social Policy · doi:10.1177/0958928706059829 · Cited by 1,327
The State and Social Capital: An Institutional Theory of Generalized Trust
Rothstein, B., & Stolle, D. (2008) · Comparative Politics · doi:10.5129/001041508x12911362383354 · Cited by 1,189
van Oorschot, W. (2000) · Policy & Politics · doi:10.1332/0305573002500811 · Cited by 1,063
Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe. A World of Difference
van Doorn, L., Alesina, A., & Glaeser, E. L. (2005) · Population · doi:10.2307/4150792 · Cited by 1,003
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Larsen C. A., 2006, The Institutional Logic of Welfare Attitudes: How Welfare Regimes Influence Public Support
- Lindbeck A., 1988, The Insider-Outsider Theory of Unemployment
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–213 of 213
Crane, J. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780198928881.003.0001
Fault or need? The UK’s approach to disability benefits since the Second World War
Millward, G. (2025) · Global Discourse · doi:10.1332/20437897y2025d000000069
Baute, S., Busemeyer, M. R., & Eick, G. M. (2025) · European Union Politics · doi:10.1177/14651165251341570
Larsen, M. H. (2025) · Acta Sociologica · doi:10.1177/00016993251351544
Who deserves student finance? Results from a survey experiment in six advanced capitalist economies
Harris, E., Taylor, A. M., Sienra, R. S., Fossati, F., Chueri, J., Gandenberger, M., & Knotz, C. (2025) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2025.2575012
Decision-Making Mistakes in Asylum Policy: A Comparative Study of Public Opinion
Cappelen, C. W., Sicakkan, H. G., & Wolleghem, P. G. V. (2025) · International Migration Review · doi:10.1177/01979183251399146
Haddad, A. F. E. (2024) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/3279d5d7z5fe1z4caczbda2zf944b49783a0
Bell, D. A. (2026) · International Journal of Social Welfare · doi:10.1111/ijsw.70097
Spehar, A., Åberg, K., Rekhis, M., Gross, L., Dellenborg, L., & Greenbrook, J. T. V. (2026) · Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/01442872.2026.2731888
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Der Waal, J., De Koster, W., & Van Oorschot, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 164-181
- ISSN
- 1387-6988 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-5448
- OpenAlex
- W2061684363
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 43.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- lirias.kuleuven.be
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis Research and Practice (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
- Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Social Sciences › Law › European Law and Migration
- Keywords
- welfare chauvinism, welfare regimes, immigrants, welfare distribution, institutional theory, income inequality, social democracy, employment protection, unemployment, European Social Survey
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
