Cited by 1,327Social Policy and Reform StudiesSocial Sciences and PoliciesEuropean Law and Migration

Making the difference in social Europe: deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states

Open access
van Oorschot, Wim·2006·Journal of European Social Policy

Abstract

Welfare states treat different groups of needy people differently. Such differential rationing may reflect various considerations of policymakers, who act in economic, political and cultural contexts. This article aims at contributing to a theoretical and empirical understanding of the popular cultural context of welfare rationing. It examines European public perceptions of the relative deservingness of four needy groups (elderly people, sick and disabled people, unemployed people, and immigrants). Hypotheses, deduced from a literature review, are tested against data from the 1999/2000 European Values Study survey. It is found that Europeans share a common and fundamental deservingness culture: across countries and social categories there is a consistent pattern that elderly people are seen as most deserving, closely followed by sick and disabled people; unemployed people are seen as less deserving still, and immigrants as least deserving of all. Conditionality is greater in poorer countries, in countries with lower unemployment, and in countries where people have less trust in fellow citizens and in state institutions. At the national level there is no relation with welfare regime type or welfare spending. Individual differences in conditionality are determined by several socio-demographic and attitudinal characteristics, as well as by certain features of the country people live in.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0958928706059829

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Oorschot, W.
Affiliations
Tilburg University, The Netherlands,
Venue
Journal of European Social Policy
Published
2006-02
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
23-42
ISSN
  • 0958-9287 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7269
OpenAlex
W2167846153
Cited by
1,327
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 105 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 130 · 2023: 95 · 2022: 148 · 2021: 117 · 2020: 132 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 109 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 26
FWCI
66.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of European Social Policy (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (acceptedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Social Sciences and Policies
  • Social Sciences › Law › European Law and Migration
Keywords
welfare conditionality, European welfare states, older adults, unemployed people, immigrants, public attitudes, institutional trust, social spending, sociodemographic differences, European Values Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review