Cited by 93Media and Digital CommunicationMedia Studies and CommunicationJournalism and Media Studies

Audience evolution and the future of audience research

Napoli, Philip M.·2012·International Journal on Media Management

Abstract

This article considers how changes in audience behaviors and in audience information systems are affecting the future of academic audience research. This article first illustrates how changes in the media environment are undermining traditional approaches to audience research while also giving rise to alternative analytical approaches. This article then outlines the contours of a next-generation audience research agenda that reflects these ongoing conceptual and methodological developments. Reflecting these developments, this article next argues for a definition of ratings analysis that focuses not on a particular aspect of audience behavior (i.e., exposure), but on whatever forms of currency are employed in the audience marketplace. From this standpoint, the new media environment provides new forms of “ratings” that exist alongside—and integrate with—the old, and that can renew and revitalize the field of ratings analysis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14241277.2012.675753

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There has been a switch from passive audience to active media users, who are looking for content that they are interested in, creating many fragmented and autonomous niches.

    “There has been a switch from passive audience to active media users, who are looking for content that they are interested in, creating many fragmented and autonomous niches [29].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Napoli, P. M.
Affiliations
Fordham University (US)
Corresponding author
Napoli, Philip M.
Venue
International Journal on Media Management
Published
2012-04
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
79-97
ISSN
  • 1424-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1424-1277
OpenAlex
W2013698882
Cited by
93
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The International Journal on Media Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
Keywords
audience research, audience behavior, new media environment, media exposure, audience measurement, research agenda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review