The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Occupation as Transactional Experience: A Critique of Individualism in Occupational Science
Abstract
Occupational science uses various concepts to denote occupation as residing within the individual. That is, despite recognizing the role of a context for the individual and her or his occupation, occupational scientists have continued to implicitly or explicitly create a dualistic view of person and context (environment). The dualism creates a problem for understanding occupation as well as the relationship of person and context. In this paper we present occupationally‐focused case studies of two individuals and assert that existing concepts of occupation in the discipline cannot encompass the situations represented by these cases. We propose the Deweyan concept of transaction as an alternative perspective for understanding occupation. The relational perspective of transactionalism means that occupation is no longer seen as a thing or as a type of self‐action or inter‐action arising from within individuals. In this view, occupation is an important mode through which human beings, as organisms‐in‐environment‐as‐a‐whole, function in their complex totality. As such, occupations become more central to the scientific understanding of person‐context relations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001 · Cited by 20,632
Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life
Steidlmeier, P., Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Swindler, A., Sullivan, W. M., & Tipton, S. M. (1986) · Review of Religious Research · doi:10.2307/3511439 · Cited by 5,061
Manifesto for a Relational Sociology
Emirbayer, M. (1997) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/231209 · Cited by 3,791
The unbearable automaticity of being
Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.7.462 · Cited by 3,699
Handbook of environmental psychology
Stokols, D., & Altman, I. (1987) · Wiley eBooks · Cited by 2,990
Dewey, J. (1929) · W W Norton & Co eBooks · doi:10.1037/13377-000 · Cited by 2,874
The Person-Environment-Occupation Model: A Transactive Approach to Occupational Performance
Law, M., Cooper, B., Strong, S., Stewart, D., Rigby, P., & Letts, L. (1996) · Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.1177/000841749606300103 · Cited by 1,550
Black, M., Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. J. (1950) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2181523 · Cited by 1,270
The Occupational Therapy Practice Framework: The Evolution of Our Professional Language
Youngstrom, M. J. (2002) · The American Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.5014/ajot.56.6.607 · Cited by 783
Occupational Science: The Evolving Discipline
Ludwig, F. M. (1997) · The American Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.5014/ajot.51.10.934d · Cited by 466
Cited by
Occupational Therapy Practice Framework: Domain and Process—Fourth Edition
(2020) · American Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.5014/ajot.2020.74s2001 · Cited by 1,449
Occupational transaction in support of miyupimaatisiiun (wellness): Eeyou/Eenou community voices
Lévesque, M. C., Kutcher, A., Roy, L., Linton, P., Trapper, L., Torrie, J. E., & MacDonald, M. E. (2023) · Journal of Occupational Science · doi:10.1080/14427591.2022.2132999 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Dickie, V., Cutchin, M. P., & Humphry, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational Science
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 83-93
- ISSN
- 1442-7591 (ISSN-L)
- 2158-1576
- OpenAlex
- W1964137079
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 25.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Occupation as Transactional Experience: A Critique of Individualism in Occupational Science. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/14427591.2006.9686573
- The paper
- Dickie, V., Cutchin, M. P., & Humphry, R. (2006). Occupation as Transactional Experience: A Critique of Individualism in Occupational Science. Journal of Occupational Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/14427591.2006.9686573
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.