Cited by 1,242Indigenous Health, Education, and RightsAustralian Indigenous Culture and HistoryIndigenous Cultures and History

Ways of knowing, being and doing: A theoretical framework and methods for indigenous and indigenist re‐search

Martin-Booran Mirraboopa, Karen·2003·Journal of Australian Studies

Abstract

[Extract] The myth of terra nullius implied that this country was uninhabited and terra nullius social policy supported by research enabled for the dispossession of knowledges of Indigenous peoples. It must be remembered that university curriculum, teaching methodologies and research endeavours have a history of development that contributed to this dispossession. Has the time come for change?

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14443050309387838

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martin-Booran Mirraboopa, K.
Affiliations
Lectured at Indigenous studies, James Cook University
Venue
Journal of Australian Studies
Published
2003-01
Volume
27
Issue
76
Pages
203-214
ISSN
  • 1444-3058 (ISSN-L)
  • 1835-6419
OpenAlex
W2033337001
Cited by
1,242
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 100 · 2025: 134 · 2024: 119 · 2023: 123 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 120 · 2020: 123 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 16
FWCI
0.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Australian Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Australian Indigenous Culture and History
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
Keywords
Indigenous research, research paradigms, ways of knowing, research ethics, higher education curriculum, teaching methods, indigenous peoples

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review