The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Open innovation: current status and research opportunities
Open accessAbstract
Interest in open innovation (OI) as a field of research has grown exponentially since the phrase was coined by Chesbrough in his 2003 book, with numerous articles, special issues, books, and conference sessions. Various reviews of the literature have summarized prior work, offered new frameworks, and identified opportunities for future research. Here we summarize these opportunities, which include more research on outbound OI, the role of open innovation in services, and network forms of collaboration such as consortia, communities, ecosystems, and platforms. Research should also examine the use of OI by small, new, and not-for-profit organizations, as well as the linkage of individual actions and motivations to open innovation. Other opportunities include better measuring the costs, benefits, antecedents, mediators and moderators of the effects of OI on performance, and understanding why and how OI is rejected, abandoned, or fails. Finally, we consider how OI can be better linked to prior theoretical research, including topics such as absorptive capacity, user innovation, resources, dynamic capabilities, business models, and the definition of the firm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Teece, D. J. (1986) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 · Cited by 7,842
Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.507 · Cited by 6,324
The business model: Recent developments and future research
Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311406265 · Cited by 4,790
Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges
van de Vrande, V., de Jong, J. P. J., Vanhaverbeke, W., & de Rochemont, M. (2009) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.001 · Cited by 2,184
Cited by
How intelligent is Watson? Enabling digital transformation through artificial intelligence
Magistretti, S., Dell’Era, C., & Messeni Petruzzelli, A. (2019) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2019.08.004 · Cited by 159
SMEs and open innovation: Challenges and costs of engagement
Costa, A., Crupi, A., De Marco, C. E., & Di Minin, A. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122731 · Cited by 104
Hidayat-ur-Rehman, I., & Alsolamy, M. (2023) · Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity · doi:10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100166 · Cited by 48
An Empirical Study on Public Sector versus Third Sector Circular Economy-Oriented Innovations
Clifton, N., Kyaw, K. S., Liu, Z., & Walpole, G. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16041650 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- West, J., & Bogers, M.
- Venue
- Innovation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-11-30
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 43-50
- ISSN
- 1447-9338 (ISSN-L)
- 2204-0226
- OpenAlex
- W2557541818
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 68.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Open innovation: current status and research opportunities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/14479338.2016.1258995
- The paper
- West, J., & Bogers, M. (2017). Open innovation: current status and research opportunities. Innovation. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2016.1258995
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.