CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 45

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The structural salience of landmarks: results from an on-line study and a virtual environment experiment

Röser, Florian, Hamburger, Kai, Krumnack, Antje, Knauff, Markus·2012·Journal of Spatial Science
DOI 10.1080/14498596.2012.686362
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The term ‘structural salience’ refers to the characteristics of landmarks that are immediately related to navigation. One of the central aspects of this kind of salience is where a landmark is located at an intersection. Klippel and Winter (2005) developed a mathematical measure that describes the ideal position of a landmark at an intersection. In the first experiment (on-line study) we examined the four different landmark positions from a bird's-eye perspective and in the second experiment (virtual environment) from an egocentric perspective. We compare our results with Klippel and Winter's model and provide some evidence to support their assumptions empirically.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14498596.2012.686362

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Caduff D., 2008, Cognitive Processing, 9, 249, 10.1007/s10339-007-0199-2 · DOI
  2. Cadwallader M.T., 1976, Environmental Knowing, 316
  3. Davis R.L., 2009, Journal of Applied Gerontology, 28, 743, 10.1177/0733464809332785 · DOI
  4. Gillner S., 2008, Cognition, 109, 105, 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.018 · DOI
  5. Hamburger K., 2011, PsychNology, 9, pp. 137
  6. Janzen G., 2006, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 493, 10.1080/02724980443000746 · DOI
  7. Janzen G., 2004, Nature Neuroscience, 7, 673, 10.1038/nn1257 · DOI
  8. Kitchin R., 2002, The Cognition of Geographic Space, 10.5040/9780755620951 · DOI
  9. Klippel A., 2005, Spatial Information Theory. International Conference COSIT, 347, 10.1007/11556114_22 · DOI
  10. Klippel A., 2009, Encyclopedia of Geoinformatics, Information Science Reference, 230
  11. Lynch K., 1960, The Image of the City
  12. Mallot H.A., 2000, Perception, 29, 43, 10.1068/p2865 · DOI
  13. Mark D.M., 1986, IEEE AES Magazine, 1, 2, 10.1109/MAES.1986.5005198 · DOI
  14. Michon P.-E., 2001, Cosit 2001, LNCS 2205, 292
  15. Peters D., 2010, Spatial Cognition VII, International Conference, Spatial Cognition 2010, 54
  16. Presson C.C., 1988, British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6, 378, 10.1111/j.2044-835X.1988.tb01113.x · DOI
  17. 10.1007/3-540-45799-2_17 · DOI
  18. Röser F., 2011, Cognitive Processing, 12, 209, 10.1007/s10339-011-0390-3 · DOI
  19. Rizzi P., 2010, Revista de Turismo y Patrimonio Cultural, 8, 39, 10.25145/j.pasos.2010.08.033 · DOI
  20. Siegel A.W., 1975, Advances in Child Development and Behaviour, 9
  21. Sorrows M.E., 1999, Spatial Information Theory: Cognitive and Computational Foundations of Geographic Information Science, International Conference (COSIT), 37
  22. Steck S.D., 2000, Presence, 9, 69, 10.1162/105474600566628 · DOI
  23. Winter S., 2003, Spatial Information Theory: Cognitive and Computational Foundations of Geographic Information Science, International Conference (COSIT), 37

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Röser, F., Hamburger, K., Krumnack, A., & Knauff, M.
Venue
Journal of Spatial Science
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2012-06
Volume
57
Issue
1
Pages
37-50
ISSN
  • 1449-8596
  • 1836-5655
DOI
10.1080/14498596.2012.686362
Cited by
45
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review