The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding what can be accomplished through interorganizational innovations The importance of typologies, context and management strategies
Abstract
There has been increasing interest in collaborations, partnerships and networks as they have emerged as interorganizational innovations to address the integrated nature of complex policy problems. Understanding the variation in how these innovations work, as well as what they do, is an important step in allowing managers to understand better the implications and applications of these arrangements. This article provides a descriptive and functional analysis of the diverse types of interorganizational innovations with an eye toward achieving a more universal typology of the variations that exist. The article details the various applications for which these different variants can be used and the contextual factors that affect them. The typology and functional analysis is useful for decision makers to assess the types of interorganizational innovations they might want to adopt in a given situation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
American Federalism and the Search for Models of Management
Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2001) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00138 · Cited by 157
Cited by
Collaborative Public Management: Assessing What We Know and How We Know It
McGuire, M. (2006) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00664.x · Cited by 933
THE LIMITATIONS OF PUBLIC MANAGEMENT NETWORKS
McGUIRE, M., & AGRANOFF, R. (2011) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01917.x · Cited by 340
McNamara, M. (2012) · International Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/01900692.2012.655527 · Cited by 174
Collaborative innovation and human-machine networks
Kattel, R., Lember, V., & Tõnurist, P. (2020) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2019.1645873 · Cited by 74
“Preparing for business model change: The “pre-stage” finding”
Cavalcante, S. A. (2014) · Journal of Management & Governance · doi:10.1007/s10997-012-9232-7 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Mandell, M., & Steelman, T.
- Venue
- Public Management Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 197-224
- ISSN
- 1461-667X (ISSN-L)
- 1471-9037
- 1471-9045
- OpenAlex
- W3125560382
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding what can be accomplished through interorganizational innovations The importance of typologies, context and management strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/1461667032000066417
- The paper
- Mandell, M., & Steelman, T. (2003). Understanding what can be accomplished through interorganizational innovations The importance of typologies, context and management strategies. Public Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461667032000066417
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.