Cited by 14Attachment and Relationship DynamicsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild and Animal Learning Development

Convergence between attachment classifications and natural reunion behavior among children and parents in a child care setting

Open access
Bick, Johanna, Dozier, Mary, Perkins, Erica·2012·Attachment & Human Development

Abstract

The current study examined the convergence between young children's attachment classifications in the laboratory-based Strange Situation Procedure and children's and parents' behaviors during naturalistic reunions after a day in child care. Fifty-eight parent-child dyads participated in this study. Children's attachment security assessed from the Strange Situation Procedure was significantly associated with ratings of children's security, avoidance, and delight toward their parents during the natural reunion episodes, and with parents' responsiveness during the natural reunion episodes. These findings suggest that natural reunions at the end of the day in child care reflect the quality of attachment relationships between young children and their parents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14616734.2012.636645

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bick, J., Dozier, M., & Perkins, E.
Affiliations
University of Delaware (US)
Corresponding author
Bick, Johanna
Venue
Attachment & Human Development
Published
2011-12-23
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
1-10
ISSN
  • 1461-6734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2988
OpenAlex
W1970709928
Cited by
14
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Attachment & Human Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH084135, R01MH052135, R01MH074374)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
attachment security, parent-child attachment, Strange Situation Procedure, child care, parental responsiveness, separation distress, attachment classification, young children, parent-child dyads
MeSH terms
Child Day Care Centers, Child, Preschool, Female, Happiness, Humans, Infant, Male, Object Attachment, Parent-Child Relations, Personality Development, Socioeconomic Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review