Cited by 317Attachment and Relationship DynamicsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Meta-analytic evidence for stability in attachments from infancy to early adulthood

Pinquart, Martin, Feußner, Christina, Ahnert, Lieselotte·2013·Attachment & Human Development

Abstract

The present meta-analysis integrates results from 127 papers on attachment stability towards mothers and fathers, respectively, from infancy to early adulthood. More than twenty-one thousand attachments (n = 21,072) and 225 time intervals were explored, ranging from half a month to 29 years (348 months). An overall coefficient of r = .39 between times T1 and T2 was obtained, reflecting a medium-sized stability of attachment security. However, no significant stability was found in intervals larger than 15 years. Coefficients are higher for time intervals of less than two years compared to time spans of more than five years, if attachments were assessed beyond infancy using representational rather than behavioral measures and if normal middle class as opposed to at-risk samples were involved. Furthermore, securely attached children at risk were less likely to maintain attachment security whereas insecurely attached children at risk most likely maintained insecurity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14616734.2013.746257

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 0 references

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 10.1037//0003–066X.46.4.333 · DOI
  2. Ainsworth M.D., 1978, Patterns of attachment
  3. Allen J.P., 2008, Handbook of attachment, 419
  4. 10.1080/14616730010001587 · DOI
  5. Bahadur M.A., 1998, The continuity and discontinuity of attachment: A longitudinal study from infancy to adulthood
  6. 10.1017/S0140525X09000843 · DOI
  7. Bartholomew K., 1991, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226
  8. Bowlby J., 1973, Attachment and loss, Vol. 2: Separation: Anxiety and anger
  9. Bowlby J., 1980, Attachment and loss: Vol. 3: Loss
  10. Bretherton I., 1990, Attachment in pre-school years, 272
  11. Cicchetti D., 2006, Development and Psychopathology, 18, 623
  12. Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
  13. Connell D.B., 1976, Individual differences in attachment: An investigation into stability, implications, and relationships to structure of early language development
  14. Crittenden P.M., 2000, The organization of attachment relationships: Maturation, culture, and context, 343
  15. Crowell J.A., 2008, Handbook of attachment, 434
  16. 10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.826 · DOI
  17. 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0602_03 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Fraley R.C., 2004, Adult attachment: Theory, research, and clinical implications, 86
  19. George C., 1985, Adult Attachment Interview Protocol
  20. 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2008.05.005 · DOI
  21. Kaplan N., 1987, Individual differences in six-year-olds’ thoughts about separation: Predicted from attachment to mothers at one year
  22. Keppler A., 2004, Entwicklung von Bindungsrepräsentationen junger Erwachsener
  23. 10.1037/0012-1649.32.3.457 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.11.080 · DOI
  25. Lamb M.E., 1985, Infant–mother attachment: The origins and developmental significance of individual differences in Strange Situation behavior
  26. 10.1111/1467-8624.00180 · DOI
  27. Lipsey M.W., 2001, Practical meta-analysis
  28. 10.1037/0033-2909.92.2.500 · DOI
  29. Siegler R., 2008, How children develop
  30. Solomon J., 2008, Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications, 383
  31. 10.2307/1131833 PMid:8625729 · DOI
  32. 10.1017/S0954579499002035 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Vice G., 2005, A meta-analysis of the stability of attachment styles from birth to adulthood
  34. 10.2307/1128714 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 268

Metadata

Authors
Pinquart, M., Feußner, C., & Ahnert, L.
Affiliations
  • Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
  • University of Vienna (AT)
Corresponding author
Pinquart, Martin
Venue
Attachment & Human Development
Published
2013-03
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
189-218
ISSN
  • 1461-6734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-2988
OpenAlex
W2003695103
Cited by
317
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 1
FWCI
17.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Attachment & Human Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
attachment stability, attachment security, maternal attachment, paternal attachment, time interval effects, insecure attachment, vulnerable children
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Child, Child, Preschool, Humans, Infant, Object Attachment, Parent-Child Relations, Risk Factors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review