The heritability of failed smoking cessation and nicotine withdrawal in twins who smoked and attempted to quit
Open accessAbstract
The magnitude of the association between nicotine withdrawal and failed smoking cessation remains uncertain, and the potential genetic contribution to that relationship is unknown. We used a twin design study to test if genetic and environmental risk factors contribute to nicotine withdrawal and failed cessation. We then estimated the magnitude of genetic and environmental risk factors and the associated correlations. Cigarette consumption data were obtained in 1992 from 4,112 (1,806 pairs, 496 singletons) male twin pairs from the Vietnam Era Twin Registry. Participants responded to a telephone administration of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule. Odds ratios were computed for failed smoking cessation as a function of 12 individual nicotine withdrawal symptoms. Genetic model fitting was performed on a sample of 1818 twin pairs, all of whom were lifetime smokers; both twins of the pairs had made at least one quit attempt. After adjustment for cigarette consumption, odds of failed smoking cessation ranged from.87 (95% CI.76-.99) for "increased appetite/weight gain" to 1.85 (95% CI 1.55-2.22) for "depressed." Genetic influences accounted for 54% and 29.7% of the variance in risk for failed smoking cessation and nicotine withdrawal, respectively. The correlation between genetic influences was significant (r=.31, 95% CI.17-.45). The magnitude of the association between failed cessation and nicotine withdrawal varied by symptom. The risk of experiencing nicotine withdrawal after a quit attempt was related partly to genetic vulnerability; lifetime risk for both failed cessation and nicotine withdrawal was related partly to genetic factors that were correlated.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Genetic factors may explain 29-53% of the variance in withdrawal symptoms and about half of the variance in quitting success.
“Genetic factors may also account for 29–53 % of the variance in withdrawal symptoms and approximately 50 % of the variance in quitting success (Xian et al. 2003, 2005; Pergadia et al. 2006).”
From Nicotine Withdrawal (2015) · cites this paper as Xian et al. 2003
Cited by
Sorted by citations
McLaughlin, I., Dani, J. A., & De Biasi, M. (2015) · Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13482-6_4 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
“Genetic factors may also account for 29–53 % of the variance in withdrawal symptoms and approximately 50 % of the variance in quitting success (Xian et al. 2003, 2005; Pergadia et al. 2006).”
BackgroundCognitive function during nicotine withdrawal: Implications for nicotine dependence treatment
Ashare, R. L., Falcone, M., & Lerman, C. (2014) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.04.034 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Genetic analyses of DSM-IV nicotine withdrawal in adult twins
PERGADIA, M. L., HEATH, A. C., MARTIN, N. G., & MADDEN, P. A. F. (2006) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291706007495 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Self-citationXIAN, H., SCHERRER, J. F., MADDEN, P. A. F., LYONS, M. J., TSUANG, M., TRUE, W. R., & EISEN, S. A. (2005) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291704003289 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Self-citationPortugal, G. S., Wilkinson, D. S., Kenney, J. W., Sullivan, C., & Gould, T. J. (2012) · Behavior Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10519-011-9489-7 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
- Authors
- Xian, H., Scherrer, J. F., Madden, P. A. F., Lyons, M. J., Tsuang, M., True, W. R., & Eisen, S. A.
- Venue
- Nicotine & Tobacco Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-01-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 245-254
- ISSN
- 1462-2203 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-994X
- OpenAlex
- W2089336534
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 2.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Nicotine & Tobacco Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Nicotine & Tobacco Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
- Health Services Research and Development
- National Institutes of Health (5r01mh037685-17, 1r03da013486-01, 5r01aa010339-03)
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (AA-10339, R01AA011822, AA11822, AA-07728)
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH37685, MH 31302)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA004604, DA-00272, DA072261-01, K21DA000272, R03-DA13486, DA4604)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Keywords
- smoking cessation, nicotine withdrawal, heritability, genetic risk factors, environmental risk factors, twin pairs, Vietnam Era Twin Registry, depression, cigarette consumption, genetic correlation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nicotine, Registries, Risk Factors, Smoking, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Twins, Prevalence, Logistic Models, Smoking Cessation, Treatment Failure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review