CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 137Smoking Behavior and CessationHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilitySubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Smoking cessation treatment on the Internet: Content, quality, and usability

Bock, Beth, Graham, Amanda, Sciamanna, Christopher, Ph.D, Jenelle Krishnamoorthy, Whiteley, Jessica, Carmona-Barros, Rosa, Niaura, Raymond, Abrams, David·2004·Nicotine & Tobacco Research
DOI 10.1080/14622200410001676332
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The explosive growth in access to the Internet suggests that the Internet may be a viable channel through which we can reach and treat the large population of smokers who are unlikely to use other modes of intervention. We applied national guidelines from the U.S. Public Health Service to assess the quality of interventions for smoking cessation that are available on the Internet. The Public Health Service guidelines were codified into two instruments to record and to rate quality of the intervention contents. Usability guidelines established by the National Cancer Institute were used to develop an instrument to assess Web site usability. Of the 202 Web sites identified in searches, 77% did not provide direct intervention over the Internet and were excluded from analyses. A total of 46 Web sites were included in our review. Usability assessments showed mixed results. Web sites were visually well organized and used consistent graphical design; however, reading difficulty averaged above the 8th-grade level. Over 80% of Web sites provided no coverage of one or more of the key components of tobacco treatment recommended in the guidelines. Ironically, areas receiving the least coverage were those most amenable to the interactive capabilities of the Internet, such as providing tailored, personalized advice to quit and arranging follow-up contact. Smokers seeking quality tobacco dependence treatment on the Internet may have difficulty distinguishing among the numerous Web sites available. Web sites that provide direct treatment often fail to fully implement treatment guidelines and do not take full advantage of the interactive and tailoring capabilities of the Internet.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14622200410001676332

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 137

Related

Metadata

Authors
Bock, B., Graham, A., Sciamanna, C., Ph.D, J. K., Whiteley, J., Carmona-Barros, R., Niaura, R., & Abrams, D.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Bock, Beth
ORCID
Venue
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2004-04-01
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
207-219
ISSN
  • 1462-2203 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-994X
DOI
10.1080/14622200410001676332
OpenAlex
W2025817486
Cited by
137
References
23
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nicotine & Tobacco Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
smoking cessation, online intervention, tobacco dependence treatment, website usability, intervention quality, reading difficulties, individual guidance, follow-up contact, online health information
MeSH terms
Humans, Information Services, Patient Education as Topic, Quality Control, Tobacco Use Disorder, United States, United States Public Health Service, Smoking Cessation, Guideline Adherence, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review