Cited by 365Smoking Behavior and CessationMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsSocial Media in Health Education

iPhone Apps for Smoking Cessation

Open access
Abroms, Lorien C., Padmanabhan, Nalini, Thaweethai, Lalida, Phillips, Todd·2011·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Background With the proliferation of smartphones such as the iPhone, mobile phones are being used in novel ways to promote smoking cessation.Purpose This study set out to examine the content of the 47 iPhone applications (apps) for smoking cessation that were distributed through the online iTunes store, as of June 24, 2009.Methods Each app was independently coded by two reviewers for its (1) approach to smoking cessation and (2) adherence to the U.S. Public Health Service's 2008 Clinical Practice Guidelines for Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence. Each app was also coded for its (3) frequency of downloads.Results Apps identified for smoking cessation were found to have low levels of adherence to key guidelines in the index. Few, if any, apps recommended or linked the user to proven treatments such as pharmacotherapy, counseling, and/or a quitline.Conclusions iPhone apps for smoking cessation rarely adhere to established guidelines for smoking cessation. It is recommended that current apps be revised and future apps be developed around evidence-based practices for smoking cessation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.10.032

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Smartphone apps may be a low-cost alternative to in-clinic cessation programs because they require no insurance or travel and can be tailored to cancer patients.

    “Remotely delivered behavioral programs for smoking cessation such as smartphone applications (“apps”) may provide a low-cost alternative to in-clinic programs since apps do not require health insurance or travel, and can be specifically tailored to cancer patients’ needs.23,24”

    From Efficacy of smartphone applications to help cancer patients quit smoking: Protocol of the Quit2Heal randomized controlled trial (2023) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Discussion (page not provided) says evidence-based smartphone apps might become useful smoking-cessation tools. It does not describe them as a low-cost alternative to in-clinic programs, address insurance or travel, or discuss tailoring apps to cancer patients. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abroms, L. C., Padmanabhan, N., Thaweethai, L., & Phillips, T.
Affiliations
  • George Washington University (US)
  • National Cancer Institute (US)
  • Academy for Educational Development (US)
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
279-285
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2131438875
Cited by
365
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 26
FWCI
27.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R44DA035017, R34DA037042)
  • National Cancer Institute (K07CA124579, R15CA167586, R01CA201873)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
Keywords
smoking cessation, iOS app, mobile health, iTunes Store, tobacco dependence treatment, pharmacotherapy, counseling, quitlines, app quality assessment, evidence-based practice
MeSH terms
Health Promotion, Humans, Tobacco Use Disorder, United States, United States Public Health Service, Smoking Cessation, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Evidence-Based Medicine, Guideline Adherence, Cell Phone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review