Cited by 51Smoking Behavior and CessationNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Human functional neuroimaging in nicotine and tobacco research: Basics, background, and beyond

McClernon, F. Joseph, Gilbert, David·2004·Nicotine & Tobacco Research

Abstract

Modern functional neuroimaging techniques allow nicotine and tobacco researchers to investigate the neurobiological basis of addiction in humans. We introduce the methods and measures of the following neuroimaging techniques: Electroencephalography and event-related cortical potentials, positron emission tomography, and functional magnetic resonance imaging. We outline strengths and limitations across modalities and describe new and emerging technologies. We provide summaries of recent neuroimaging findings in the field of nicotine and tobacco research for neurochemistry, smoking and nicotine administration, craving and cue-reactivity, cognitive and affective information processing, and tobacco withdrawal. We address limitations of studies to date and identify opportunities for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14622200412331337394

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Craving and cognitive impairments are reliable markers of nicotine withdrawal.

    “Although craving and cognitive impairments are reliable markers of nicotine withdrawal (Kenney and Gould, 2008; Levin et al, 2006; McClernon et al, 2004; Rezvani and Levin, 2001), anxiety has been shown to impact relapse rate as well (Dani and Harris, 2005; DiMatteo et al, 2000).”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McClernon, F. J., & Gilbert, D.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US)
Corresponding author
McClernon, F. Joseph
Venue
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Published
2004-12-01
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
941-959
ISSN
  • 1462-2203 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-994X
OpenAlex
W1989245255
Cited by
51
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nicotine & Tobacco Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA012289, R01 DA12289, R01DA017837, K23DA017261)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
nicotine, tobacco, addiction, neuroimaging, EEG, event-related potentials, positron emission tomography, functional MRI, smoking, craving, cue reactivity, nicotine withdrawal, cognitive processes, emotional processing, neurochemistry
MeSH terms
Affect, Brain, Cognition, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Ganglionic Stimulants, Hemodynamics, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Mental Processes, Monoamine Oxidase, Nicotine, Smoking, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Tobacco Use Disorder, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review