Courtesy and the challenges of implementing smoke‐free policies in Japan
Abstract
For decades, the tobacco companies have developed a worldwide campaign to oppose the creation of smoke-free environments. Public health efforts to promote clean indoor air have been uneven throughout the world, and in few places have such efforts faced as many challenges as in Japan. The Japanese market is dominated by Japan Tobacco, which is partly owned by the government, and Philip Morris International is also present in Japan. Japan Tobacco and Philip Morris International have developed campaigns promoting courtesy and tolerance that, until recently, seem to have resonated well with the public. The companies also have supported research promoting ventilation and have funded consultants to act as experts in the area of second-hand smoke exposure. Japan is a critical country to study, partly because of the strength of Japan Tobacco in the country and the growth of Japan Tobacco International in Southeast Asia and the rest of the world, and partly because of Japan's ratification of the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. This paper uses tobacco industry documents to provide an overview of the tobacco industry's scientific and political efforts to stifle the development of clean indoor measures in Japan. Learning past industry strategies may assist policymakers and advocates in the development of future public health activities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Japanese government and JTI share similar pro-tobacco control sentiments.
“As a result, Japanese government and JTI share similar pro-tobacco control sentiments (Bialous, Mochizuki-Kobayashi et al. 2006).”
From Civil society and the negotiation of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (2009) · cites this paper as Bialous, Mochizuki-Kobayashi et al. 2006
Cites
Barnes, D. E., & Bero, L. A. (1996) · Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law · doi:10.1215/03616878-21-3-515 · Cited by 176 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This desire to keep the tobacco industry’s involvement a secret is a frequent industry strategy to maintain scientific credibility, as the industry acknowledges that a scientist’s link with tobacco companies could undermine the credibility of the research findings ( Barnes & Bero, 1996; Drope & Chapman, 2001; Hirschho…”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Civil society and the negotiation of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control
Mamudu, H. M., & Glantz, S. A. (2009) · Global Public Health · doi:10.1080/17441690802095355 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bialous, S. A., Mochizuki‐Kobayashi, Y., & Stillman, F.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stillman, Frances
- Venue
- Nicotine & Tobacco Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-04-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 203-216
- ISSN
- 1462-2203 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-994X
- OpenAlex
- W2011564282
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nicotine & Tobacco Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
- Keywords
- smoke-free policies, tobacco industry, Philip Morris International, passive smoking, Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, tobacco control, Japan
- MeSH terms
- Smoking Prevention, Health Plan Implementation, Health Policy, Humans, Japan, National Health Programs, Public Health, Smoking, Tobacco Smoke Pollution, Tobacco Industry, Inhalation Exposure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review