Cited by 67Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention

Medicaid provider delivery of the 5A's for smoking cessation counseling

Chase, Emily, McMenamin, Sara, Halpin, Helen Ann·2007·Nicotine & Tobacco Research

Abstract

This paper assesses rates of the 5A's (ask, advise, assess, assist, and arrange) of brief provider counseling received by Medicaid-enrolled smokers and recent quitters and the differences in receipt of counseling as a function of age, gender, race, ethnicity, and health status. A random sample telephone survey was conducted among Medicaid-enrolled smokers and recent quitters in four geographic areas in the United States. Multivariate logistic regression models estimated the relationships between demographic characteristics and delivery of the 5A's. Less than 10% of Medicaid smokers and recent quitters reported receiving all 5A's. Medicaid providers delivered the ask, assess, and advise components of smoking cessation counseling to the majority of their patients who were smokers or recent quitters. However, they were much less likely to provide comprehensive counseling, with fewer than 25% of patients reporting receiving any assistance with quitting (i.e., a prescription for pharmacotherapy or referral to counseling) or arrangement of a follow-up visit or phone call. Receipt of the 5A's varied as a function of health status, race, and ethnicity. Medicaid needs to (a) increase provider delivery of the full spectrum of counseling interventions recommended for smoking cessation and (b) extend provider outreach to the demographic groups that receive the lowest rates of counseling.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14622200701666344

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Limited visit time, competing medical priorities, and insufficient financial incentives for health promotion all create barriers to behavioral counseling.

    “Limited visit time, competing medical priorities, and insufficient financial incentives for health promotion all create barriers.45”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chase, E., McMenamin, S., & Halpin, H. A.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
McMenamin, Sara
Venue
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Published
2007-11
Volume
9
Issue
11
Pages
1095-1101
ISSN
1462-2203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980309902
Cited by
67
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nicotine & Tobacco Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Keywords
Medicaid, smoking cessation, brief counseling, health disparities, racial and ethnic disparities, health status, tobacco use
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Adult, Counseling, Female, Humans, Male, Medicaid, Middle Aged, Office Visits, Patient Education as Topic, Primary Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Smoking, Tobacco Use Disorder, United States, Logistic Models, Smoking Cessation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review