The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Letter-by-letter Reading: Psychological Descriptions of a Neurologial Syndrome
Abstract
Following a general description of the characteristics of letter-by-letter reading and a summary of previous explanations of this reading deficit in both neurological and psychological models, four single-case studies of patients with this syndrome are presented. One central topic, addressed by experimental investigation, concerns comprehension of written words. Despite the use of multiple techniques, no evidence was obtained for the hypothesis that comprehension of a word could occur prior to or in the absence of the letter-by-letter analysis required for oral reading. It appears that these patients must do sequential letter identification of a word in order both to understand it and to report it. A second central topic, addressed through analysis of reading errors, concerns procedures for word recognition. Two of the four patients showed a “pure” letter-by-letter syndrome, with no difficulty in word recognition once the component letters had been identified. For the other two patients, an additional lexical deficit often prevented a correctly identified sequence of letters from achieving recognition as the correct word. Alternative interpretations of these patterns are discussed in terms of a process model.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Factors affecting speed in serial verbal reactions
Stroop, J. R. (1938) · Psychological Monographs · doi:10.1037/h0093516 · Cited by 179
Subangular alexia without agraphia or hemianopsia
Greenblatt, S. H. (1976) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/0093-934x(76)90019-5 · Cited by 102
Cited by
Priming and Human Memory Systems
Tulving, E., & Schacter, D. L. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2296719 · Cited by 2,595
Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area
Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.049 · Cited by 776
Bentin, S., Mouchetant-Rostaing, Y., Giard, M. H., Echallier, J. F., & Pernier, J. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892999563373 · Cited by 725
SCHACTER, D. L. (1990) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1990.tb48909.x · Cited by 418
Tuning of the human left fusiform gyrus to sublexical orthographic structure
Binder, J. R., Medler, D. A., Westbury, C. F., Liebenthal, E., & Buchanan, L. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.053 · Cited by 286
Metadata
- Authors
- Patterson, K., & Kay, J.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1982-08
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 411-441
- ISSN
- 0272-4987 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0740
- OpenAlex
- W2056541120
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.