Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area
Abstract
Is there specialization for visual word recognition within the visual ventral stream of literate human adults? We review the evidence for a specialized "visual word form area" and critically examine some of the arguments recently placed against this hypothesis. Three distinct forms of specialization must be distinguished: functional specialization, reproducible localization, and regional selectivity. Examination of the literature with this theoretical division in mind indicates that reading activates a precise subpart of the left ventral occipitotemporal sulcus, and that patients with pure alexia consistently exhibit lesions of this region (reproducible localization). Second, this region implements processes adequate for reading in a specific script, such as invariance across upper- and lower-case letters, and its lesion results in the selective loss of reading-specific processes (functional specialization). Third, the issue of regional selectivity, namely, the existence of putative cortical patches dedicated to letter and word recognition, cannot be resolved by positron emission tomography or lesion data, but requires high-resolution neuroimaging techniques. The available evidence from single-subject fMRI and intracranial recordings suggests that some cortical sites respond preferentially to letter strings than to other categories of visual stimuli such as faces or objects, though the preference is often relative rather than absolute. We conclude that learning to read results in the progressive development of an inferotemporal region increasingly responsive to visual words, which is aptly named the visual word form area (VWFA).
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Cohen and Dehaene argue that reading in literate adults relies on a specialized left ventral occipitotemporal region, the visual word form area (VWFA), and that evidence supports functional specialization and reproducible localization, though not definitive regional selectivity. They review neuroimaging and pure alexia data to rebut Price and Devlin’s critique.
Key findings
- The paper distinguishes three forms of specialization: functional specialization, reproducible localization, and regional selectivity. It concludes that reading activates a precise subpart of the left ventral occipitotemporal sulcus and that pure alexia consistently involves lesions there, supporting reproducible localization.
- Functional specialization is supported by reading-specific effects: the VWFA responds more to consonant strings than pseudo-letters/false fonts, more to words/pseudo-words than random consonant strings, and shows case-invariant priming across upper- and lower-case letters.
- The VWFA is found at the same Talairach location with a standard deviation of only about half a centimeter; essentially all subjects show left-hemisphere word-induced activation, while right-sided activation is weaker and found in only a few subjects.
- Regional selectivity is not definitively established: most word-responsive patches also activate to pictures or drawings, and the authors argue that PET group data with 15-mm spatial smoothness cannot resolve this issue.
Methods
- Theoretical review and critical commentary, not a new empirical study. It reviews functional neuroimaging (PET, fMRI, MEG, intracranial recordings) and neuropsychological studies of pure alexia.
- The authors emphasize high-resolution single-subject fMRI and intracranial recordings for localization/selectivity, and lesion-overlap studies for anatomo-clinical correlation.
- They argue that PET data are appropriate for functional contrasts but not for fine anatomical specialization, and that priming/adaptation designs are needed to test shared circuitry.
Limitations
- The authors state that evidence for regional selectivity is not definitive; most cortical patches responding to words also activate to other stimuli, and current imaging resolution is several millimeters.
- They note that PET/fMRI are ill-adapted to resolve top-down versus bottom-up temporal dynamics, and that across-study variability can be higher due to differences in brain normalization.
- Evident from the text: this is a letter/review defending the VWFA against a specific critique, not a systematic meta-analysis, and several cited supporting studies are in press or in preparation.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 140 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingnone given§ Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area · p. 1
Available evidence from single-subject fMRI and intracranial recordings suggests that some cortical sites respond preferentially to letter strings than to other categories of visual stimuli such as faces or objects, though the preference is often relative rather than absolute.
“The available evidence from single-subject fMRI and intracranial recordings suggests that some cortical sites respond preferentially to letter strings than to other categories of visual stimuli such as faces or objects, though the preference is often relative rather than absolute.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area · p. 1
Patients with pure alexia consistently exhibit lesions of this region.
“patients with pure alexia consistently exhibit lesions of this region (reproducible localization).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area · p. 1
Reading activates a precise subpart of the left ventral occipitotemporal sulcus.
“Examination of the literature with this theoretical division in mind indicates that reading activates a precise subpart of the left ventral occipitotemporal sulcus”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ The hypothesis of the visual word form area · p. 3
There is not complete regional selectivity for word recognition.
“We do not, however, believe that there is complete regional selectivity for word recognition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation§ Evidence for reproducible localization · p. 4
A large number of studies, using various methods, have evidenced a reproducible activation of the left fusiform gyrus during reading.
“A large number of studies, using various methods, have evidenced a reproducible activation of the left fusiform gyrus during reading.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
- Findingcitation§ Methodological issues · p. 4
Evidence from priming or adaptation paradigms provides evidence for functional specialization for case-invariant letter recognition in the left fusiform region.
“although it provides evidence for functional specialization for case-invariant letter recognition in the left fusiform region (Dehaene et al., 2001; Dehaene et al., in press).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Dehaene et al., 2001 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Dehaene et al., in press
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ Evidence for reproducible localization · p. 4
Activation in the left fusiform gyrus during reading can be identified merely by contrasting word reading relative to rest, either with PET or with fMRI.
“Activation in this region can be identified merely by contrasting word reading relative to rest, either with PET or with fMRI (Beauregard et al., 1997; Brunswick et al., 1999; Dehaene et al., 2002; Fiez et al., 1999; Paulesu et al., 2000; Wagner et al., 1998).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Findingcitation§ Evidence for reproducible localization · p. 4
The left fusiform region appears as a likely source of electrical and magnetic fields that are recorded over the left ventral occipitotemporal region, with a latency of about 150-200 ms, whenever subjects see words.
“This region appears as a likely source of electrical and magnetic fields that are recorded over the left ventral occipitotemporal region, with a latency of about 150-200 ms, whenever subjects see words (Allison et al., 1994, 1999; Cohen et al., 2000; Nobre et al., 1994; Salmelin et al., 1996; Simos et al., 2002; Tarkiainen et al., 1999).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Findingreasoning§ The hypothesis of the visual word form area · p. 3
Even the voxels that respond optimally to words tend to be also activated by other stimuli such as pictures or line drawings of objects.
“Even the voxels that respond optimally to words tend to be also activated by other stimuli such as pictures or line drawings of objects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ Evidence for reproducible localization · p. 4
The VWFA is found at the same location in Talairach space (approximately -43, -54, -12) with a standard deviation of only about half a centimeter.
“The VWFA is found at the same location in Talairach space (approximately 43, 54, 12) with a standard deviation of only about half a centimeter.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation§ Functional specialization · p. 5
The VWFA is tuned to the shape of letters, relative to visually equivalent pseudo-letters.
“First, there are indications that the VWFA is tuned to the shape of letters, relative to visually equivalent pseudo-letters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Findingreasoning§ Evidence for reproducible localization · p. 4
Interindividual variability of the VWFA location is remarkably low.
“This allows quantification of the interindividual variability, which is remarkably low.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation§ Evidence for partial regional selectivity · p. 5
Words in modalities other than the visual yielded activations more anterior (average y = -43) than those typical of the visual word form (average y = -60).
“As already noted by Bu ¨chel et al. (1998), words in modalities other than the visual yielded activations more anterior (average y = 43) than those typical of the visual word form (average y = 60).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Büchel et al. (1998) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ Evidence for reproducible localization · p. 4
There is good convergence to the same approximate Talairach coordinates across studies of the VWFA.
“There is good convergence to the same approximate Talairach coordinates across those studies (Cohen et al., 2000).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cohen et al., 2000 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ Evidence for partial regional selectivity · p. 4
This systematic topographical organization was reproduced by Gauthier et al. (2000).
“This systematic topographical organization was reproduced by Gauthier et al. (2000).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gauthier et al. (2000) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data§ Evidence for partial regional selectivity · p. 5
The left occipitotemporal sulcus (average coordinates -44, -68, -4) was activated only by visual words, not by spoken words.
“The left occipitotemporal sulcus (average coordinates 44, 68, 4) was activated only by visual words, not by spoken words.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation§ Evidence for partial regional selectivity · p. 5
Such a distinction is supported by several neuroimaging studies and by intracranial recordings.
“Such a distinction is supported by several neuroimaging studies (e.g. Booth et al., 2002b; see review in Giraud and Price, 2001) as well as by intracranial recordings (Nobre et al., 1994, 1998).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Booth et al., 2002b
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Giraud and Price, 2001
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Nobre et al., 1994, 1998
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation§ Evidence for reproducible localization · p. 4
The VWFA can be identified in single subjects.
“Several fMRI papers have further shown that this area can be identified in single subjects (Cohen et al., 2000, 2002; Dehaene et al., 2002; Gauthier et al., 2000; Puce et al., 1996).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Findingcitation§ Evidence for reproducible localization · p. 4
Price et al. (1996) obtained stronger activations to strings of consonants than to strings of pseudo-letters at coordinates close to the VWFA.
“For instance, Price et al. (1996) have obtained stronger activations to strings of consonants than to strings of pseudo-letters at coordinates close to the VWFA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Price et al. (1996) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ Evidence for reproducible localization · p. 4
The VWFA is activated by words presented in either the left or the right hemifield, contrary to more posterior retinotopic areas.
“In one study, we isolated the VWFA using a spatial invariance criterion: contrary to more posterior retinotopic areas, the VWFA is activated by words presented in either the left or the right hemifield (Cohen et al., 2000).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cohen et al., 2000 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data§ Evidence for partial regional selectivity · p. 5
Another more lateral and slightly more anterior inferotemporal region (-48, -60, -16) was activated also by spoken words, with modulation by the graphemic task.
“Another more lateral and slightly more anterior inferotemporal region ( 48, 60, 16) was activated also by spoken words, with modulation by the graphemic task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation§ Evidence for partial regional selectivity · p. 4
Hasson et al. (2002) found a site with greater responsivity to words than to either faces or buildings in the left occipitotemporal sulcus, lateral to face- and building-related activations.
“Hasson et al. (2002) also used fMRI to contrast activations to words, houses, and faces. Again, a site with greater responsivity to words than to either faces or buildings was found in the left occipitotemporal sulcus, lateral to face- and building-related activations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hasson et al. (2002) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ Evidence for reproducible localization · p. 4
The VWFA responds more to strings of letters than to chequerboards presented in either hemifield.
“In another, we further required this region to respond more to strings of letters than to chequerboards presented in either hemifield (Cohen et al., 2002).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cohen et al., 2002 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data§ Evidence for partial regional selectivity · p. 5
In a group analysis, this activation overlapped with the VWFA, as defined by a left inferior temporal activation that was greater to visual than to spoken words.
“In a group analysis, this activation overlapped with the VWFA, as defined by a left inferior temporal activation that was greater to visual than to spoken words.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Evidence for partial regional selectivity · p. 5
In single subjects, the two regions appeared as distinct but very close.
“However, in single subjects, the two regions appeared as distinct but very close.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning§ Evidence for partial regional selectivity · p. 4
The available evidence reveals systematic and reproducible activations that are greater to visual words than to other control stimuli.
“Nevertheless, the available evidence reveals systematic and reproducible activations that are greater to visual words than to other control stimuli.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation§ Functional specialization · p. 5
Price et al. (1996) observed stronger activation in the left fusiform gyrus to strings of consonants than to strings of false-font characters.
“Following up on the initial insight of Petersen et al. (1990), Price et al. (1996) observed stronger activation in the left fusiform gyrus to strings of consonants than to strings of false-font characters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Price et al. (1996) source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ Evidence for reproducible localization · p. 4
Similar results have been obtained using single-subject MEG and intracranial recordings.
“Similar results have been obtained using singlesubjects MEG (Tarkiainen et al., 1999) and intracranial recordings (Allison et al., 1999).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Findingcitation§ Functional specialization · p. 5
Strings of letters cause greater left fusiform activation than visually equivalent strings of digits.
“There is also evidence that strings of letters cause greater left fusiform activation than visually equivalent strings of digits (Polk et al., 2002).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Polk et al., 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ Evidence for partial regional selectivity · p. 5
The interference of orthography prevents the detection of the phoneme ''p'' in the spoken French word ''absurde''.
“For instance, the interference of orthography prevents the detection of the phoneme ''p'' in the spoken French word ''absurde'' (Halle ´ et al., 2000).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hallé et al., 2000 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data§ Functional specialization · p. 6
The posterior subpart of mid-fusiform cortex, observed bilaterally, is not invariant for location: it shows priming when single letters are repeated at the same retinal location, irrespective of whether the prime word is identical to the target or an anagram of it.
“The posterior subpart, observed bilaterally, was not invariant for location: it showed priming when single letters were repeated at the same retinal location, irrespective of whether the prime word was identical to the target or was an anagram of it.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation§ Pure alexia and reproducible localization · p. 7
In such cases, reduced activations of the VWFA for words presented in the left hemifield were observed.
“In such cases, we observed reduced activations of the VWFA for words presented in the left hemifield (Cohen et al., 2000; Molko et al., 2002).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Findingcitation§ Functional specialization · p. 6
In a recent word priming study, the mid-fusiform cortex can be decomposed into smaller subareas.
“In a recent word priming study, we found indications that the mid-fusiform cortex can be decomposed into smaller subareas (Dehaene et al., in press).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dehaene et al., in press
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ Functional specialization · p. 6
The VWFA shows equally robust fMRI responses when words are presented in a familiar format or in a mixed-case format (e.g. ''tAbLe'').
“The VWFA shows equally robust fMRI responses when words are presented in a familiar format or in a mixed-case format (e.g. ''tAbLe'') (Polk and Farah, 2002).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Polk and Farah, 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ Functional specialization · p. 5
Intracranial recording suggests that there may be specialized subregions for letters vs. digits in the ventral occipitotemporal cortex.
“Indeed, intracranial recording suggests that there may be specialized subregions for letters vs. digits in the ventral occipitotemporal cortex (Allison et al., 1994).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Allison et al., 1994 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ Functional specialization · p. 6
Such case-invariant priming in the VWFA was recently replicated with words made only of visually dissimilar letters that are related only by arbitrary cultural convention (e.g. a and A, g and G).
“Such case-invariant priming in the VWFA was recently replicated with words made only of visually dissimilar letters that are related only by arbitrary cultural convention (e.g. a and A, g and G) (Dehaene et al., in press).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dehaene et al., in press
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data§ Functional specialization · p. 6
Even more anteriorly in the middle fusiform gyrus, there was a trend towards greater priming when the same word was presented twice compared to when it was preceded by an anagram.
“Finally, even more anteriorily in the middle fusiform gyrus, there was a trend towards greater priming when the same word was presented twice compared to when it was preceded by an anagram, suggesting the presence of the units larger than the letter level.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Pure alexia and reproducible localization · p. 6
In the authors' recent work, a similar region of lesion overlap in the fusiform gyrus was found.
“In our recent work, we also found a similar region of lesion overlap in the fusiform gyrus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cohen et al., 2003 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ Functional specialization · p. 6
The VWFA shows repetition priming whenever a target word is preceded by a subliminal presentation of the same word, whether the two words are printed in the same or in a different case.
“Furthermore, the VWFA shows repetition priming whenever a target word is preceded by a subliminal presentation of the same word, whether the two words are printed in the same or in a different case (e.g. table followed by TABLE) (Dehaene et al., 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dehaene et al., 2001 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation§ Functional specialization · p. 6
The VWFA responds more to words or to pseudo-words than to random consonant strings that violate orthographic constraints.
“Second, the VWFA responds more to words or to pseudo-words than to random consonant strings that violate orthographic constraints (Beauregard et al., 1997; Bu ¨chel et al., 1998; Cohen et al., 2002; Price et al., 1996; Rees et al., 1999; Xu et al., 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Findingnone given§ Conclusion · p. 8
Most cortical patches that respond to words also activate to other stimuli such as pictures or drawings.
“Nevertheless, most cortical patches that respond to words also activate to other stimuli such as pictures or drawings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ Theoretical issues in visual word recognition · p. 2
We are able to recognize words across considerable changes in font, case, location, and size.
“We are able to recognize words across considerable changes in font , CASE, location , and size.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning§ Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area · p. 1
Lesion of this region results in the selective loss of reading-specific processes.
“its lesion results in the selective loss of reading-specific processes (functional specialization).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Theoretical issues in visual word recognition · p. 2
The visual word recognition process is highly efficient in normalizing and computing an invariant representation that discards irrelevant variations in the visual input.
“This implies that the visual word recognition process is highly efficient in ''normalizing'' and computing an invariant representation that discards irrelevant variations in the visual input.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Introduction · p. 1
Such perceptual expertise is likely to require specialized neural systems within the ventral visual stream.
“We argue that such perceptual expertise is likely to require specialized neural systems within the ventral visual stream.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given§ Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area · p. 1
The issue of regional selectivity cannot be resolved by positron emission tomography or lesion data, but requires high-resolution neuroimaging techniques.
“the issue of regional selectivity, namely, the existence of putative cortical patches dedicated to letter and word recognition, cannot be resolved by positron emission tomography or lesion data, but requires high-resolution neuroimaging techniques.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area · p. 1
This region implements processes adequate for reading in a specific script, such as invariance across upper- and lower-case letters.
“this region implements processes adequate for reading in a specific script, such as invariance across upperand lower-case letters”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area · p. 1
Learning to read results in the progressive development of an inferotemporal region increasingly responsive to visual words, which is aptly named the visual word form area (VWFA).
“We conclude that learning to read results in the progressive development of an inferotemporal region increasingly responsive to visual words, which is aptly named the visual word form area (VWFA).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Introduction · p. 1
This perceptual expertise requires no less than 5 years of academic training in a specific writing system.
“This perceptual expertise requires no less than 5 years of academic training in a specific writing system (Aghababian and Nazir, 2000).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Aghababian and Nazir, 2000
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Reading in literate adults requires quick identification of visual words across large variations of irrelevant parameters such as position, size, color, font, or case.
- Interpretationcitation§ The hypothesis of the visual word form area · p. 3
At the scale accessible to human neuroimaging, most if not all of the cortical surface is likely to respond jointly to words, faces, and objects, with smooth but systematic changes in local selectivity.
“Therefore, at the scale accessible to human neuroimaging, most if not all of the cortical surface is likely to respond jointly to words, faces, and objects, with smooth but systematic changes in local selectivity (Haxby et al., 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Haxby et al., 2001 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ The hypothesis of the visual word form area · p. 3
There is reproducible localization of the neural circuits that are attuned to the reading process.
“We also propose that there is reproducible localization of the neural circuits that are attuned to the reading process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Theoretical issues in visual word recognition · p. 2
The word superiority effect implies the existence of a mechanism tuned to the possible structures of visual words.
“This phenomenon, which is found with real words, pseudo-words (Spoehr and Smith, 1975), and even nonwords sufficiently similar to words such as SPCT (Rumelhart and McClelland, 1982), implies the existence of a mechanism tuned to the possible structures of visual words.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Theoretical issues in visual word recognition · p. 2
The case invariance observed in several psychological experiments must arise from specialization resulting from a learning process.
“Rather, the case invariance observed in several psychological experiments (e.g. Besner et al., 1984; Bowers et al., 1998) must arise from specialization resulting from a learning process.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationcitation§ The hypothesis of the visual word form area · p. 3
The rather large occipitotemporal region termed VWFA can be further subdivided into, for instance, a posterior location-specific sector and a more anterior location-invariant sector.
“Finally, it is likely that the rather large occipitotemporal region that we have termed VWFA can be further subdivided into, for instance, a posterior location-specific sector and a more anterior location-invariant sector (see Dehaene et al., in press).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dehaene et al., in press
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Theoretical issues in visual word recognition · p. 2
The absence of a word length effect suggests the presence of a parallel apprehension mechanism specialized for reading.
“This suggests the presence of a parallel apprehension mechanism specialized for reading.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Methodological issues · p. 3
The finding of overlap between word-related and non-word-related tasks is not conclusive, as it seems likely that even cortical territories known to be distinct would be found to overlap with this method.
“In this context, the finding of overlap between wordrelated and non-word-related (e.g. color or object processing) tasks is not conclusive, as it seems likely that even cortical territories known to be distinct would be found to overlap with this method.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: PET group data are typically generated with a spatial smoothness of 15 mm.
- Premisecitation§ Theoretical issues in visual word recognition · p. 2
Within a range of about three to six letters, visual word recognition takes a constant time regardless of the number of letters composing that word.
“Also remarkable is the absence of any effect of word length: within a range of about three to six letters, visual word recognition takes a constant time regardless of the number of letters composing that word (Lavidor and Ellis, 2002; Weekes, 1997).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Lavidor and Ellis, 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Weekes, 1997 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Theoretical issues in visual word recognition · p. 2
The absence of a length effect is found only when the words are presented in the familiar horizontal format and within a restricted region of the fovea and right hemifield.
“Note that the absence of a length effect is found only when the words are presented in the familiar horizontal format and within a restricted region of the fovea and right hemifield (Lavidor and Ellis, 2002; Lavidor et al., 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Lavidor and Ellis, 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lavidor et al., 2001 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Methodological issues · p. 4
Some of the first evidence for a specific response to structured letter strings, as opposed to matched visual stimuli, came from PET.
“Indeed, some of the first evidence for a specific response to structured letter strings, as opposed to matched visual stimuli, came from PET (Petersen and Fiez, 1993; Petersen et al., 1990).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Petersen and Fiez, 1993
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Petersen et al., 1990 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductreasoning§ Methodological issues · p. 4
PET data remain appropriate to study functional rather anatomical specialization for word processing.
“PET data remain appropriate to study functional rather anatomical specialization for word processing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ The hypothesis of the visual word form area · p. 3
There is functional specialization for reading in the brain of literate human subjects.
“We propose that there is functional specialization for reading in the brain of literate human subjects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ Theoretical issues in visual word recognition · p. 2
The computational requirements for invariant recognition are largely common to the recognition of any type of visual objects.
“Those computational requirements are largely common to the recognition of any type of visual objects: Tools, buildings, or faces can all appear with huge variations in their appearance, including size, location, orientation, and so on.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Riesenhuber and Poggio, 1999 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning§ Theoretical issues in visual word recognition · p. 2
What constitutes a significant visual difference and what does not is defined culturally rather than visually.
“In general, however, what constitutes a significant visual difference and what does not is defined culturally rather than visually.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Theoretical issues in visual word recognition · p. 2
The fast mapping of ''A'' and ''a'' onto the same abstract letter identity cannot be explained by generic features of the organization of the visual system.
“Thus, the fast mapping of ''A'' and ''a'' onto the same abstract letter identity cannot be explained by generic features of the organization of the visual system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ The hypothesis of the visual word form area · p. 3
This cortex is partially plastic and can, during ontogenesis, become progressively attuned to the requirements of reading.
“This cortex is partially plastic and can, during ontogenesis, become progressively attuned to the requirements of reading (McCandliss et al., 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McCandliss et al., 2003 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ The hypothesis of the visual word form area · p. 3
The functional specialization for reading arises from a partial preemption or ''recycling'' of visual cortex which evolved for other purposes during phylogenesis.
“This should not be surprising because the functional specialization for reading arises from a partial preemption or ''recycling'' of visual cortex which evolved for other purposes during phylogenesis (Dehaene, 2004).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dehaene, 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Theoretical issues in visual word recognition · p. 2
In the case of reading, crucial aspects of the capacity of invariant recognition must be learned.
“In the case of reading, crucial aspects of this capacity of invariant recognition must be learned.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Theoretical issues in visual word recognition · p. 2
At least part of the specialization for letter and word recognition occurs at retinotopically organized stages of visual processing.
“This suggests that at least part of the specialization for letter and word recognition occurs at retinotopically organized stages of visual processing (Nazir, 2000).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Nazir, 2000
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Methodological issues · p. 3
Individual sulci are known to vary at least up to 1 cm.
“This is especially true when the method is applied across different groups of subjects, although individual sulci are known to vary at least up to 1 cm (Sowell et al., 2002; Thompson et al., 1996).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Study design and conductcitation§ Methodological issues · p. 4
Only advanced experimental designs, such as the priming or adaptation method, are apt at proving the presence of shared circuitry.
“Only advanced experimental designs, such as the priming or adaptation method (Grill-Spector and Malach, 2001; Naccache and Dehaene, 2001), are apt at proving the presence of shared circuitry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Grill-Spector and Malach, 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Naccache and Dehaene, 2001
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ The hypothesis of the visual word form area · p. 3
It is rather unlikely that the visual word area would have sharp borders that would delineate it qualitatively from other neighboring areas involved in face or object recognition.
“We also consider it rather unlikely that the visual word area would have sharp borders that would delineate it qualitatively from other neighboring areas involved in face or object recognition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ The hypothesis of the visual word form area · p. 3
In most subjects, the specialization for words is likely to be only partial.
“In most subjects, however, the specialization for words is likely to be only partial.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ The hypothesis of the visual word form area · p. 3
We do not believe that there is a cytoarchitectonically defined subpart of the visual system that responds to visual words.
“We do not believe that there is a cytoarchitectonically defined subpart of the visual system that responds to visual words.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given§ Theoretical issues in visual word recognition · p. 2
Many of the mappings between upper case and lower case are arbitrary.
“Many of the mappings between upper case and lower case, for instance, are arbitrary.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Theoretical issues in visual word recognition · p. 2
A generic visual recognition device is simply insufficient to account for the notation-dependent operations that are observed in skilled readers.
“A generic visual recognition device is simply insufficient to account for the notation-dependent operations that are observed in skilled readers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Evidence for partial regional selectivity · p. 5
The acquisition of literacy modifies the brain network involved in speech repetition (especially for pseudo-words).
“It is known that the acquisition of literacy modifies the brain network involved in speech repetition (especially for pseudo-words, see Castro-Caldas et al., 1998).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Castro-Caldas et al., 1998 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Evidence for partial regional selectivity · p. 5
In the present state of knowledge, it cannot be denied that small subregions of visual cortex show at least partial selectivity for letter strings.
“However, in the present state of knowledge, it cannot be denied that small subregions of visual cortex show at least partial selectivity for letter strings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Evidence for partial regional selectivity · p. 5
The visual word form area must be carefully distinguished from more anterior regions that are increasingly cross-modal and engaged in semantic computations.
“Thus, we suggest that the visual word form area must be carefully distinguished from more anterior regions that are increasingly cross-modal and engaged in semantic computations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Evidence for partial regional selectivity · p. 5
This does not preclude the possibility of its top-down activation by auditory words.
“This does not, however, preclude the possibility of its top-down activation by auditory words.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductcitation§ Evidence for reproducible localization · p. 4
Simple subtractions allow a more specific delineation of the VWFA.
“However, simple subtractions allow a more specific delineation of the VWFA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning§ Evidence for partial regional selectivity · p. 5
PET and fMRI studies are ill-adapted to resolve the issue of top-down or bottom-up posterior inferotemporal activations because they cannot resolve the fine temporal dynamics of neural activity.
“PET and FMRI studies are ill-adapted to resolve the issue of top-down or bottom-up posterior inferotemporal activations because they cannot resolve the fine temporal dynamics of neural activity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ Evidence for partial regional selectivity · p. 5
A dramatic interference of orthography on speech perception has been evidenced in a variety of behavioral tasks including rhyme detection, syllable monitoring, lexical decision, and phoneme monitoring.
“Furthemore, a dramatic interference of orthography on speech perception has been evidenced in a variety of behavioral tasks including rhyme detection (Donnenwerth-Nolan et al., 1981), syllable monitoring (Taft and Hambly, 1985), lexical decision (Ziegler and Ferrand, 1998), and phoneme monitoring.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Donnenwerth-Nolan et al., 1981 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Taft and Hambly, 1985
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ziegler and Ferrand, 1998
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Pure alexia and reproducible localization · p. 6
Even in patients with large lesions, combining lesions from multiple patients may allow identification of the necessary and sufficient regions reproducibly associated with pure alexia.
“Second, even in patients with large lesions, the combination of lesions from multiple patients may allow to identify the necessary and sufficient regions that are reproducibly associated with pure alexia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Pure alexia and reproducible localization · p. 6
In that case, the lesion affected the expected region of the left mid-fusiform cortex, with an extension to the lateral edge of the lingual gyrus.
“The lesion affected the expected region of the left mid-fusiform cortex, with an extension to the lateral edge of the lingual gyrus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Beversdorf et al., 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ Pure alexia and reproducible localization · p. 7
Output projections from the VWFA to lateral language areas may be interrupted in parietal white matter, providing a plausible account for subangular alexia.
“Conversely, output projections from the VWFA to lateral language areas may be interrupted during their course in the parietal white matter, providing a plausible account for the so-called subangular alexia (Greenblatt, 1976; Iragui and Kritchevsky, 1991; Pirozzolo et al., 1981).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationown data§ Functional specialization · p. 6
More anterior fusiform cortex holds a location-invariant sublexical code.
“More anteriorily, priming became location invariant, though present for both words and their anagrams, suggesting a location-invariant sublexical code.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Pure alexia and reproducible localization · p. 7
Even assuming the fusiform was spared, these observations would not necessarily contradict the proposed model due to the possible contribution of white matter lesions.
“Even assuming that it was, these observations would not necessarily contradict the proposed model due to the possible contribution of white matter lesions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Functional specialization · p. 6
The VWFA computes the arbitrary mapping between upper- and lower-case letters.
“Third, there is also evidence that the VWFA computes the arbitrary mapping between upperand lower-case letters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Functional specialization · p. 5
Such a fine-grained specialization cannot be explained by a generic visual process.
“Such a fine-grained specialization cannot be explained by a generic visual process.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Pure alexia and reproducible localization · p. 6
Binder and Mohr (1992) delineated a critical region for pure alexia that fell within the left middle fusiform gyrus.
“The critical region fell within the left middle fusiform gyrus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Binder and Mohr, 1992
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Evidence from neuropsychology · p. 6
In the most severe cases, known as global alexia, pure alexic patients cannot even identify single letters.
“In the most severe cases, known as global alexia, they cannot even identify single letters (Dejerine, 1892).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dejerine, 1892
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Pure alexia and reproducible localization · p. 7
Alexia restricted to the left half of the visual field results from lesions of posterior callosal pathways.
“The clearest example of such a deafferentation is the alexia restricted to the left half of the visual field which results from lesions of posterior callosal pathways (Suzuki et al., 1998).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Suzuki et al., 1998 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ Pure alexia and reproducible localization · p. 7
White matter lesions may blur anatomo-functional correlations.
“A factor that may blur anatomo-functional correlations is the role of white matter lesions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Functional specialization · p. 6
The middle fusiform gyrus contains units larger than the letter level.
“Finally, even more anteriorily in the middle fusiform gyrus, there was a trend towards greater priming when the same word was presented twice compared to when it was preceded by an anagram, suggesting the presence of the units larger than the letter level.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Pure alexia and reproducible localization · p. 7
Simple considerations on the input and output pathways of the VWFA provide a detailed and consistent explanation for the variety of visual alexias seen in adult neuropsychological cases.
“Altogether, simple considerations on the input and output pathways of the VWFA provide a detailed and consistent explanation for the variety of visual alexias seen in adult neuropsychological cases (Cohen et al., 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cohen et al., 2003 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Pure alexia and reproducible localization · p. 7
No firm anatomical argument, positive or negative, can be made from Warrington and Shallice's cases.
“Thus, no firm anatomical argument, positive or negative, can be made from Warrington and Shallice's cases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Evidence from neuropsychology · p. 6
The simplest account of pure alexia is that it reflects a breakdown of the visual word form system.
“The simplest account of pure alexia is that it reflects a breakdown of the visual word form system (Cohen et al., 2000; Warrington and Shallice, 1980).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Cohen et al., 2000 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Warrington and Shallice, 1980
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ Pure alexia and reproducible localization · p. 7
The anatomical case reported by Greenblatt (1973) may be an instance of complete deafferentation of an intact fusiform cortex.
“Finally, the anatomical case reported by Greenblatt (1973) may be an instance of complete deafferentation of an intact fusiform cortex (see also Cohen et al., submitted for publication).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Greenblatt, 1973 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Cohen et al., submitted for publication
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data§ Functional specialization · p. 6
The posterior subpart of mid-fusiform cortex likely holds a location-specific sublexical code.
“Thus, this region likely holds a location-specific sublexical code.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Functional specialization · p. 6
This suggests that the VWFA has become sensitive to orthographic rules in the subject's language, which are matters of cultural convention.
“This suggests that it has become sensitive to orthographic rules in the subject's language, which are matters of cultural convention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Pure alexia and regional selectivity · p. 7
Associations of deficits provide only a weak source of constraints.
“However, such associations of deficits are known to provide only a weak source of constraints (Shallice, 1988).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Shallice, 1988
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Pure alexia and reproducible localization · p. 6
Binder and Mohr (1992), Damasio and Damasio (1983), and Cohen et al. (2003) agree on the lateral edge of the left fusiform gyrus as associated with pure alexia.
“Such work was done by Binder and Mohr (1992), Damasio and Damasio (1983), and more recently by our group (Cohen et al., 2003), with a good agreement of these studies on the lateral edge of the left fusiform gyrus.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation§ Pure alexia and reproducible localization · p. 6
Not all pure alexic patients have extensive lesions blurring anatomical correlations.
“First, not all patients have extensive lesions blurring anatomical correlations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Beversdorf et al., 1997
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion · p. 8
The intermingling of such neurons with others coding for objects or faces would translate into a partial regional selectivity at the single-voxel level, which is all that can presently be measured with PET or fMRI.
“The intermingling of such neurons with others coding for objects or faces would translate into a partial regional selectivity at the single-voxel level, which is all that we can presently measure with PET or fMRI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Pure alexia and regional selectivity · p. 7
Because the VWFA may contain cortical columns specialized for letter processing mixed with columns with different preferences, disruption of the VWFA would likely induce some degree of impairment beyond reading.
“Given that the VWFA may contain cortical columns specialized for letter processing, mixed with columns with different preferences (Puce et al., 1999), it is likely that a disruption of the VWFA would induce some degree of impairment beyond reading (Behrmann et al., 1998a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Puce et al., 1999 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Behrmann et al., 1998a
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ Conclusion · p. 8
The reproducible localization of the VWFA indicates that only a small subregion of visual cortex has the optimal initial characteristics that permit it to be preempted or recycled for reading.
“We tentatively suggest that the reproducible localization of the VWFA indicates that only a small subregion of visual cortex has the optimal initial characteristics that permit it to be preempted or ''recycled'' for reading (Dehaene, 2004).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dehaene, 2004
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ Pure alexia and regional selectivity · p. 7
P&D's hypothesis that reading is more complex and imposes greater demands on visual processing is not sufficiently articulate to account for double dissociations such as object agnosia without alexia or prosopagnosia without alexia.
“is not sufficiently articulate to account for double dissociations such as object agnosia without alexia (Albert et al., 1975; Gomori and Hawryluk, 1984) or prosopagnosia without alexia (e.g. McNeil and Warrington, 1993).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Albert et al., 1975 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gomori and Hawryluk, 1984
Not checked in the free run.
- cites McNeil and Warrington, 1993
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Pure alexia and regional selectivity · p. 7
Impaired identification of even single letters is common in pure alexia, ranging in severity from complete global alexia to occasional errors with significant slowing of letter naming.
“Furthermore, impaired identification of even single letters is common in pure alexia, ranging in severity from complete global alexia to the occurrence of occasional errors with a significant slowing down of letter naming (for a review, see Behrmann et al., 1998b; e.g. Hanley and Kay, 1996).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Behrmann et al., 1998b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hanley and Kay, 1996
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion · p. 8
Such neurophysiological mechanisms may provide a neuronal basis for the acquisition of invariant visual word recognition in humans.
“Such neurophysiological mechanisms may provide a neuronal basis for the acquisition of invariant visual word recognition in humans.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Conclusion · p. 8
Binding of letters may also be based on more holistic coding, as suggested by the demonstration that single IT neurons develop selectivity for learned complex shapes above and beyond additive influence of component parts.
“Binding of letters may also be based on more holistic coding, as suggested by the recent demonstration that single IT neurons develop selectivity for learned complex shapes, above and beyond what could be expected from the additive influence of their component parts (Baker et al., 2002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Baker et al., 2002 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion · p. 8
Such observations predict the existence of highly specialized but patchy and distributed neuronal populations coding for alphabetic stimuli at the single-neuron level.
“Such observations predict the existence of highly specialized but patchy and distributed neuronal populations coding for alphabetic stimuli at the single-neuron level.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Pure alexia and regional selectivity · p. 7
It is unclear how general accounts may account for the frequent sparing of recognition of complex multipart objects, faces, or digit strings in pure alexic patients.
“However, it is unclear how this may account for the frequent sparing of the recognition of complex multipart objects, faces, or digit strings in pure alexic patients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion · p. 8
The conjunction of these factors may collectively conspire to define a cortical region optimally apt at hosting the functional processes of visual word recognition.
“The conjunction of these factors may collectively conspire to define a cortical region optimally apt at hosting the functional processes of visual word recognition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Conclusion · p. 8
The ability of IT neurons to learn arbitrary shapes and pairings might be an analogue of learning letters and of linking arbitrarily related upper- and lowercase letters.
“IT neurons are able to learn new arbitrary shapes (Logothetis et al., 1995), and arbitrary pairings of stimuli (Sakai and Miyashita, 1991), which might be an analogue of learning letters and of linking arbitrarily related upper- and lowercase letters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ Pure alexia and regional selectivity · p. 7
Even if there is a cortical sector highly selective for alphabetic stimuli, a spontaneous lesion would be unlikely to affect it with perfect selectivity while sparing adjacent cortex.
“Even assuming that there is a cortical sector highly selective for the perception of alphabetic stimuli, it would be unlikely that a spontaneous lesion should affect this region with perfect selectivity although sparing the adjacent cortex.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Pure alexia and regional selectivity · p. 7
This symptom presents a real challenge to nonspecific theories of pure alexia because it is difficult to argue that single letters are more complex than faces or drawings of objects.
“This symptom presents a real challenge to nonspecific theories of pure alexia because it is difficult to argue that single letters are in any sense more complex than faces or drawings of objects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Pure alexia and regional selectivity · p. 7
It is hardly surprising that some degree of associated visual impairment can be evidenced in most alexic patients.
“Thus, it is hardly surprising that some degree of associated visual impairment can be evidenced in most alexic patients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion · p. 8
Visual word recognition therefore necessarily makes use of preexisting primate circuitry.
“Visual word recognition therefore necessarily makes use of preexisting primate circuitry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Pure alexia and regional selectivity · p. 7
Warrington and Shallice (1980) and Patterson and Kay (1982) showed that patients with letter-by-letter reading could accurately report digits flanking a letter string even when stimuli were flashed for 150 ms and comprised as many as eight intervening letters.
“For instance, as an argument against a general impairment of parallel visual processing, Warrington and Shallice (1980) and Patterson and Kay (1982) showed that patients with letter-by-letter reading could accurately report digits flanking a letter string (e.g. 6APPLE4), even when such stimuli were flashed for 150 ms and comprised as many as eight intervening letters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Warrington and Shallice, 1980
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Patterson and Kay, 1982
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Pure alexia and functional specialization · p. 7
The dissociation between letters and digits in pure alexia dates back to Dejerine's observation that the patient recognizes very well all digits although he cannot recognize a single letter.
“This dissociation between letters and digits in pure alexia dates back to Dejerine's observation, as he noted that ''the patient recognizes very well all digits'', although ''he cannot recognize a single letter'' (Cohen and Dehaene, 1995; Dejerine, 1892; Holender and Peereman, 1987; for imaging data, see also Pinel et al., 2001; Polk et al., 2002).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Cohen and Dehaene, 1995
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Dejerine, 1892
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Holender and Peereman, 1987
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ Pure alexia and functional specialization · p. 7
During the acquisition of literacy, the VWFA incorporates script- or language-specific arbitrary regularities.
“We propose that during the acquisition of literacy, the VWFA incorporates script- or language-specific arbitrary regularities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Conclusion · p. 8
In the macaque perirhinal cortex, specific visual experience induces development of clusters of neurons with similar stimulus preferences.
“In the macaque perirhinal cortex, specific visual experience induces development of clusters of neurons with similar stimulus preferences (Erickson et al., 2000).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Erickson et al., 2000 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Pure alexia and regional selectivity · p. 7
There is presently no complete account of pure alexia in terms of a general visual problem.
“However, we believe that there is presently no complete account of pure alexia in terms of a ''general visual problem''.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Conclusion · p. 8
The binding of letters into words might be related to the representation of complex objects in IT cortex through the coactivation of neurons tuned to their elementary parts.
“Likewise, the binding of letters into words might be related to the representation of complex objects in IT cortex through the coactivation of neurons tuned to their elementary parts (Tsunoda et al., 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tsunoda et al., 2001 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ Pure alexia and functional specialization · p. 7
Chanoine et al. (1998) reported closely similar findings in another patient.
“Chanoine et al. (1998) reported closely similar findings in another patient.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chanoine et al., 1998 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ Pure alexia and functional specialization · p. 8
Such features of pure alexia cannot be plausibly accounted for from nonspecific perceptual impairments.
“Such features of pure alexia cannot be plausibly accounted for from nonspecific perceptual impairments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 49
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 14
May combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ Theoretical issues in visual word recognition · p. 2Very small details that are relevant to reading are maintained and even amplified.
“At the same time, however, very small details that are relevant to reading are maintained and even amplified.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone given§ Evidence for reproducible localization · p. 4When word reading is contrasted to a resting period, the active regions comprise a large unspecific component of visual activity.
“When word reading is contrasted to a resting period, the active regions obviously comprise a large unspecific component of visual activity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Evidence for partial regional selectivity · p. 5Booth et al. (2002a, 2003) observed an activation of the VWFA (TC -45, -57, 12) when subjects engaged in a spelling task on auditory words, but not when they engaged in a rhyming task on the same stimuli.
“Thus, Booth et al. (2002a, 2003) observed an activation of the VWFA (TC 45, 57, 12) when subjects engaged in a spelling task on auditory words, but not when they engaged in a rhyming task on the same stimuli.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Booth et al. (2002a, 2003)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ Evidence for reproducible localization · p. 4Essentially all subjects show word-induced activation in the left hemisphere, whereas a symmetrical right-sided activation is only found in a few subjects and at a weaker level.
“Essentially all subjects show wordinduced activation in the left hemisphere, whereas a symmetrical right-sided activation is only found in a few subjects and at a weaker level.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Evidence for partial regional selectivity · p. 5Consistent with a top-down effect, we observed a left posterior inferotemporal activation even when spoken words were presented, and with a greater intensity during the grapheme task than during the phoneme task.
“Consistent with a topdown effect, we observed a left posterior inferotemporal activation even when spoken words were presented, and with a greater intensity during the grapheme task than during the phoneme task.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cohen et al., in preparation
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Evidence for partial regional selectivity · p. 5The anterior activations were sensitive to the semantic demands of the task, whereas the posterior activations were observed even for visual pseudo-words relative to random letter strings.
“Furthermore, the anterior activations were sensitive to the semantic demands of the task, whereas the posterior activations were observed even for visual pseudo-words relative to random letter strings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Evidence for partial regional selectivity · p. 4Puce et al. (1996) report that nine out of twelve subjects showed greater activation to words than to faces in the left occipitotemporal sulcus, although a neighboring but slightly more mesial site conversely showed preferential activation to faces than to words.
“Puce et al. (1996) report single-subject activations during passive presentation of visual words, faces, and textures. Nine out of twelve subjects showed greater activation to words than to faces in the left occipitotemporal sulcus, although a neighboring but slightly more mesial site conversely showed preferential activation to faces than to words.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Puce et al. (1996) source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Findingcitation§ Evidence for partial regional selectivity · p. 4Hasson et al. (2003) suggest that the visual word-related activation always falls at a systematic location at the boundary between object-selective and face-selective regions in a large-scale map of object preference.
“Hasson et al. (2003) suggest that the visual word-related activation always falls at a systematic location at the boundary between object-selective and face-selective regions in a large-scale map of object preference.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hasson et al. (2003) source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Evidence for partial regional selectivity · p. 5In every subject, the left posterior fusiform gyrus was activated by visual words but there was no trace of activation by spoken words.
“In agreement with our hypotheses, in every subject, the left posterior fusiform gyrus was activated by visual words but there was no trace of activation by spoken words.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dehaene et al., 2002 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Evidence for partial regional selectivity · p. 4This region showed the same selectivity whether the stimuli were presented foveally or peripherally, confirming a previous demonstration of location invariance in this region.
“This region showed the same selectivity whether the stimuli were presented foveally or peripherally, confirming a previous demonstration of location invariance in this region (Cohen et al., 2000).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cohen et al., 2000 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Evidence for partial regional selectivity · p. 5Recent work using MEG to compare spoken and written word processing confirms that posterior inferior temporal activation is present early on (approximately 170 ms) when reading words, but are absent or confined to the late part of the epoch when hearing words.
“However, recent work using MEG to compare spoken and written word processing confirms that posterior inferior temporal activation is present early on (approximately 170 ms) when reading words, but are absent or confined to the late part of the epoch when hearing words (Marinkovic et al., 2003, Figs. 1 and 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Marinkovic et al., 2003 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Evidence for partial regional selectivity · p. 5The posterior part of the VWFA contains case-invariant but not location-invariant letter detectors, whereas its middle part is invariant across both case and location and may be sensitive to units larger than a single letter.
“Recently, for instance, we showed that its posterior part contains case-invariant but not location-invariant letter detectors, whereas its middle part is invariant across both case and location and may be sensitive to units larger that a single letter (see Dehaene et al., in press).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dehaene et al., in press
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Functional specialization · p. 6More anteriorly, priming became location invariant, though present for both words and their anagrams.
“More anteriorily, priming became location invariant, though present for both words and their anagrams, suggesting a location-invariant sublexical code.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Pure alexia and reproducible localization · p. 6This lesion overlap region was larger than the VWFA strictly defined but precisely encompassed the region of activation to words identified in fMRI studies of reading.
“Although this region was admittedly larger than the VWFA strictly defined, it precisely encompassed the region of activation to words identified in fMRI studies of reading (Cohen et al., 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cohen et al., 2003 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ Introduction · p. 1An area in the midportion of the left fusiform gyrus activates whenever literate subjects are presented with strings of letters and contributes crucially to the cerebral basis of the visual word form.
“We formulated the idea that an area in the midportion of the left fusiform gyrus, which activates whenever literate subjects are presented with strings of letters, contributes crucially to the cerebral basis of the visual word form.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cohen et al., 2000 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Reading in literate adults requires quick identification of visual words across large variations of irrelevant parameters such as position, size, color, font, or case.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Theoretical issues in visual word recognition · p. 2The visual system is attuned to the minute difference between ''eight'' and ''sight'', which it amplifies so that we ultimately address completely different regions of lexical space, although it discards the much greater differences between ''eight'' and ''EIGHT''.
“Our visual system is attuned to the minute difference between ''eight'' and ''sight'', which it amplifies so that we ultimately address completely different regions of lexical space, although it discards the much greater differences between ''eight'' and ''EIGHT''.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Introduction · p. 1The visual system of skilled readers must achieve perceptual invariance, parallel letter processing, and tuning to a specific writing system.
“We show that it must achieve perceptual invariance, parallel letter processing, and tuning to a specific writing system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Introduction · p. 1Several areas specialized for other classes of visual stimuli such as faces, places, or body parts have been identified in the human ventral visual stream.
“The VWFA hypothesis was framed in the broader context of recent studies of functional specialization within the human ventral visual stream, in which have been identified several areas specialized for other classes of visual stimuli such as faces, places, or body parts (Downing et al., 2001; Hasson et al., 2003; Haxby et al., 2001; Kanwisher et al., 1997).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationreasoning§ Methodological issues · p. 4It is possible that the overlap is merely due to the coexistence of distinct, functionally unrelated circuits within approximately the same region.
“It is possible that the overlap is merely due to the coexistence of distinct, functionally unrelated circuits within approximately the same region.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ The hypothesis of the visual word form area · p. 3Whenever subjects read a word, a reproducible portion of the left occipitotemporal sulcus is activated and hosts functionally specialized circuits for letter and word recognition.
“In particularly, within the visual system, we claim that whenever subjects read a word, a reproducible portion of the left occipitotemporal sulcus is activated and hosts functionally specialized circuits for letter and word recognition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ Theoretical issues in visual word recognition · p. 2The word superiority effect is the fact that when asked to detect the presence of a letter, subjects typically show superior performance when the letter is embedded in a visual string that respects the structure of the learned language than when it is embedded in a random string.
“The word superiority effect is the fact that when asked to detect the presence of a letter, subjects typically show superior performance when the letter is embedded in a visual string that respects the structure of the learned language than when it is embedded in a random string.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Reicher, 1969 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ The hypothesis of the visual word form area · p. 3The density of neurons activated during reading probably varies continuously, though nonrandomly, across the surface of the ventral occipitotemporal cortex, thus creating a landscape of local preference for various categories of objects.
“Rather, the density of neurons activated during reading probably varies continuously, though nonrandomly, across the surface of the ventral occipitotemporal cortex, thus creating a landscape of local preference for various categories of objects (Hasson et al., 2002; Haxby et al., 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Study design and conductreasoning§ The hypothesis of the visual word form area · p. 3The issue of the nature of the contribution of a given cortical sector to reading can be addressed completely independently of the orthogonal issue of whether neurons in this cortical sector also contribute to object or face recognition.
“The issue of the nature of the contribution of a given cortical sector to reading (e.g. Is it caseindependent? Is it location-invariant? Does it code for single letters, or for graphemes, syllables, or morphemes?) can be addressed completely independently of the orthogonal issue of whether neurons in this cortical sector also contribute to object or face recognition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Theoretical issues in visual word recognition · p. 2Both computational arguments and experimental psychological data point to specialization for visual word recognition in skilled readers.
“All in all, both computational arguments and experimental psychological data point to specialization for visual word recognition in skilled readers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Theoretical issues in visual word recognition · p. 2The word superiority effect is found with real words, pseudo-words, and even nonwords sufficiently similar to words such as SPCT.
“This phenomenon, which is found with real words, pseudo-words (Spoehr and Smith, 1975), and even nonwords sufficiently similar to words such as SPCT (Rumelhart and McClelland, 1982), implies the existence of a mechanism tuned to the possible structures of visual words.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Spoehr and Smith, 1975
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Rumelhart and McClelland, 1982
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Theoretical issues in visual word recognition · p. 2Reading poses particular problems to the visual system, some of which (such as case invariance) are specific to reading in a given script.
“Rather, reading poses particular problems to the visual system, some of which (such as case invariance) are specific to reading in a given script.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ The hypothesis of the visual word form area · p. 3There may be columns of neurons specialized for the recognition of letters, graphemes, or words, but they are likely to be intermixed with other neurons involved in object and face recognition.
“There may be columns of neurons specialized for the recognition of letters, graphemes, or words, but they are likely to be intermixed with other neurons involved in object and face recognition (Puce et al., 1999).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Puce et al., 1999 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ Evidence for partial regional selectivity · p. 5Those results suggest that posterior inferotemporal activations during auditory word processing are optional and contingent on the engagement of the subject in orthographic processing.
“Those results suggest that posterior inferotemporal activations during auditory word processing are optional and contingent on the engagement of the subject in orthographic processing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Study design and conductnone given§ Functional specialization · p. 5To demonstrate functional specialization in the VWFA, one should exhibit a pattern of activation that cannot be reduced to generic visual processes, but necessarily reflects regularities of the writing system.
“To demonstrate functional specialization in the VWFA, one should exhibit a pattern of activation that cannot be reduced to generic visual processes, but necessarily reflects regularities of the writing system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Study design and conductreasoning§ Evidence for partial regional selectivity · p. 5High-resolution single-subject studies are needed to evaluate the claim that the very same region is activated in both bottom-up and top-down cases.
“High-resolution single-subject studies are needed to evaluate the claim that the very same region is activated in both cases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ Evidence for partial regional selectivity · p. 5It is likely that, as our ability to image this region evolves, more subdivisions will appear within what we currently think of as a single VWFA.
“It is likely that, as our ability to image this region evolves, more subdivisions will appear within what we currently think of as a single VWFA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ Evidence for partial regional selectivity · p. 5This indicates clearly that this region is not a supramodal area and is not automatically activated during auditory word processing.
“This indicates clearly that this region is not a supramodal area and is not automatically activated during auditory word processing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Evidence from neuropsychology · p. 6More frequently, pure alexic patients show relatively preserved, albeit slow, letter identification abilities and resort to letter-by-letter reading strategies.
“More frequently, pure alexic patients show relatively preserved, albeit slow, letter identification abilities and resort to letter-by-letter reading strategies (for references, see Montant and Behrmann, 2000).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Montant and Behrmann, 2000
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ Functional specialization · p. 6Processing in the VWFA goes beyond generic processes of size and location normalization, and is capable of establishing the arbitrary links between upper- and lower-case letters.
“This indicates that processing in the VWFA goes beyond generic processes of size and location normalization, and is capable of establishing the arbitrary links between upperand lower-case letters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Pure alexia and reproducible localization · p. 6The critical region appears slightly more anterior than the VWFA, but methodological differences in lesion reconstruction may account for this discrepancy.
“Although it appears slightly more anterior than the VWFA, methodological differences in the reconstruction of lesions may be sufficient to account for this discrepancy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Pure alexia and reproducible localization · p. 7A few cases of alexia restricted to the RVF have been reported and may be due to left intrahemispheric lesions deafferenting the VWFA but sparing low-level visual regions.
“Similarly, a few cases of alexia restricted to the RVF have been reported, and may be due to left intrahemispheric lesions deafferenting the VWFA but sparing low-level visual regions (Castro-Caldas and Salgado, 1984).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Castro-Caldas and Salgado, 1984
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Pure alexia and reproducible localization · p. 7One of Warrington and Shallice's patients had a haemorrhage large enough to cause 1 month of coma, and the other had an invasive temporoparietal glioma evolving for several years; there is no evidence that the fusiform was spared.
“One lesion was a haemorrhage large enough to cause 1 month of coma, and the other one was an invasive temporoparietal glioma which had been evolving for several years, and there is no evidence that the fusiform was spared.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Warrington and Shallice, 1980
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Pure alexia and reproducible localization · p. 6There is good convergence towards the site of the VWFA as the anatomical correlate of pure alexia, although precision of correlations should still be improved.
“Thus, although the precision of the correlations should still be improved, there is good convergence towards the site of the VWFA as the anatomical correlate of pure alexia.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Pure alexia and reproducible localization · p. 6Beversdorf et al. (1997) reported a pure alexic case with a limited surgical excision and demonstrative postmortem data.
“To take but one example, Beversdorf et al. (1997) report a case with a limited surgical excision and demonstrative postmortem data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Beversdorf et al., 1997
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Evidence from neuropsychology · p. 6The clinical pattern of pure alexia reflects the loss of fast and parallel letter perception mechanisms and, in severe cases, the loss of single letter identification abilities.
“This clinical pattern thus reflects (1) the loss of fast and parallel letter perception mechanisms and (2) in severe cases, the loss of single letter identification abilities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Pure alexia and reproducible localization · p. 7Pure alexia should result either from a disruption of the VWFA itself, or from impaired projections to or from this system.
“Our hypothesis implies that pure alexia should result either from a disruption of the VWFA itself, or from impaired projections to or from this system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Pure alexia and reproducible localization · p. 7The extent of the lesions in Warrington and Shallice's two alexic patients was not reported in any detail, and the fusiform gyrus may well have been affected.
“Actually, the extent of the patients' lesions was not reported in any detail, and the fusiform gyrus may well have been affected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Functional specialization · p. 6The effect holds quite generally, at least in passive viewing conditions or with tasks that require equal attention to words and to consonant strings; no difference, or even a reversal, can be observed if the task is more difficult to perform with consonant strings than with words.
“This holds quite generally, at least in passive viewing conditions or with tasks that require equal attention to words and to consonant strings; no difference, or even a reversal, can be observed if the task is more difficult to perform with consonant strings than with words (Cohen et al., 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cohen et al., 2003 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Conclusion · p. 8IT neurons are able to learn new arbitrary shapes and arbitrary pairings of stimuli.
“IT neurons are able to learn new arbitrary shapes (Logothetis et al., 1995), and arbitrary pairings of stimuli (Sakai and Miyashita, 1991), which might be an analogue of learning letters and of linking arbitrarily related upper- and lowercase letters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone given§ Conclusion · p. 8This picture results from imaging methods with limited resolution (several millimeters) and may change as one becomes able to visualize or record from small cortical patches, columns, or even single neurons.
“One should keep in mind that this picture results from imaging methods with limited resolution (several millimeters) and may change as one becomes able to visualize or record from small cortical patches, columns, or even single neurons.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Conclusion · p. 8The region that activates to visual words is well delimited and occupies a fixed location relative to other regions that preferentially respond to faces, houses, or objects.
“The region that activates to visual words is well delimited and occupies a fixed location relative to other regions that preferentially respond to faces, houses, or objects (Hasson et al., 2002, 2003; Puce et al., 1996).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hasson et al., 2002, 2003
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Puce et al., 1996 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Pure alexia and functional specialization · p. 7That patient could accurately discriminate real letters from visually equivalent pseudo-letters, as well as normally oriented letters from mirror-reversed letters.
“However, she could accurately discriminate real letters from visually equivalent pseudo-letters, as well as normally oriented letters from mirror-reversed letters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Miozzo and Caramazza, 1998
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion · p. 8This constitutes sufficient evidence to label this region the visual word form area, even if at present the evidence for regional selectivity is not definitive.
“We claim that this constitutes sufficient evidence to label this region the visual word form area, even if at present the evidence for the third type of cortical specialization (regional selectivity) is not definitive.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Conclusion · p. 8It takes years for children to develop expert word recognition, and the emergence of this expertise correlates with the amount of activation of the VWFA by letter strings in normal and dyslexic children.
“Finally, it should be remembered that it takes years for children to develop expert word recognition (Aghababian and Nazir, 2000), and that the emergence of this expertise correlates with the amount of activation of the VWFA by letter strings in normal and dyslexic children (McCandliss et al., 2003; Shaywitz et al., 2002; Temple, 2002).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ Pure alexia and functional specialization · p. 7This pattern suggests a loss of abstract orthographic knowledge, with preservation of a basic familiarity with individual letter shapes.
“This suggests a loss of abstract orthographic knowledge, with preservation of a basic familiarity with individual letter shapes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Pure alexia and functional specialization · p. 8These features reflect the breakdown of the functional specialization incorporated during the acquisition of literacy, including knowledge of the finite set of characters, the links between upper- and lower-case letters, and the organization in arbitrary subsets of symbols such as letters and digits.
“Rather, they reflect the breakdown of the functional specialization incorporated during the acquisition of literacy, including knowledge of the finite set of characters, the links between upper- and lower-case letters, and the organization in arbitrary subsets of symbols such as letters and digits.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ Conclusion · p. 8The left lateralization of the VWFA may result from interhemispheric differences in the processing of spatial frequencies or in the invariant vs. token-specific coding of visual objects.
“As to the left lateralization of the VWFA, it may result from interhemispheric differences in the processing of spatial frequencies (Kitterle and Selig, 1991) or in the invariant vs. token-specific coding of visual objects (Burgund and Marsolek, 1997).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kitterle and Selig, 1991
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Burgund and Marsolek, 1997
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Conclusion · p. 8The 5400 years that have elapsed since the invention of reading are too short to permit the evolution of dedicated biological mechanisms for learning to read.
“The 5400 years that have elapsed since its invention are too short to permit the evolution of dedicated biological mechanisms for learning to read.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Reading is a recent cultural activity of the human species.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Conclusion · p. 8Neurophysiological and optical imaging methods indicate a high degree of local cortical specialization in inferotemporal (IT) neurons, with columnar clustering of cells with similar selectivity.
“Neurophysiological and optical imaging methods indicate a high degree of local cortical specialization in inferotemporal (IT) neurons (Tanaka, 1996), with columnar clustering of cells with similar selectivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tanaka, 1996 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion · p. 8There is no ready-made module for visual word recognition, but a progressive specialization process that capitalizes on the plasticity of the human ventral inferotemporal cortex to build the VWFA.
“There is thus no ready-made ''module'' for visual word recognition, but a progressive specialization process that capitalizes on the plasticity of the human ventral inferotemporal cortex to build the VWFA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion · p. 8The evidence to date favors a model of partially distributed and overlapping representation of visual categories, with a landscape of partial but not absolute preferences across the ventral cortical surface.
“Thus, the evidence to date favors a model of partially distributed and overlapping representation of visual categories (Haxby et al., 2000, 2001), with a landscape of partial but not absolute preferences across the ventral cortical surface.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Haxby et al., 2000, 2001
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Conclusion · p. 8The left lateralization of the VWFA may also imply preferential connections to left-hemispheric language areas.
“The lateralization may also imply preferential connections to lefthemispheric language areas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion · p. 8Psychological, neuropsychological, and neuroimaging data converge to suggest that the human brain of literate subjects contains specialized mechanisms for visual word recognition (functional specialization), which map in a systematic way onto the properties of a cortical subregion of the left posterior occipitotemporal sulcus (reproducible localization).
“Psychological, neuropsychological, and neuroimaging data converge to suggest that the human brain of literate subjects contains specialized mechanisms for visual word recognition (functional specialization), which map in a systematic way onto the properties of a cortical subregion of the left posterior occipitotemporal sulcus (reproducible localization).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Pure alexia and functional specialization · p. 7In Chanoine et al.'s patient, when distractors were digits or simple geometrical shapes, the patient could easily match lower- and upper-case letters, or pick out a printed letter named by the examiner, although these tasks were severely impaired when distractors were other letters.
“They also observed that whenever the distractors were digits or simple geometrical shapes, the patient could easily match lower- and upper-case letters, or pick out a printed letter named by the examiner, although these tasks were severely impaired when the distractors were other letters.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chanoine et al., 1998 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Pure alexia and functional specialization · p. 7The patient studied by Miozzo and Caramazza (1998) was severely impaired at naming single letters and was unable to decide whether an upper- and lower-case letter had the same name.
“For instance, the patient studied by Miozzo and Caramazza (1998) was severely impaired at naming single letters, and she was unable to decide whether an upper- and lower-case letter had the same name or not.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Miozzo and Caramazza, 1998
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
Reading in literate adults requires quick identification of visual words across large variations of irrelevant parameters such as position, size, color, font, or case.
“The efficiency of reading in literate adults rests on the ability to quickly identify visual words across large variations of irrelevant parameters such as position, size, color, font, or case.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The VWFA can be reproducibly observed in all cultures, even in readers of nonalphabetic scripts.
“We further claim that this area can be reproducibly observed in all cultures, even in readers of nonalphabetic scripts.”
The paper relies on this without support.
PET group data are typically generated with a spatial smoothness of 15 mm.
“However, such data are typically generated with a spatial smoothness of 15 mm in PET group studies.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Reading is a recent cultural activity of the human species.
“Reading is a recent cultural activity of the human species.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The posterior temporal region more active for letter than category fluency overlaps with the visual word form area and with multimodal orthographic-phonological processing sites.
“Interestingly, the region of posterior temporal cortex more active for the letter than category fluency conditions overlaps with an area implicated by previous studies as being involved in the visual processing of word forms (i.e., the visual word form areas, VWFA; McCandliss et al., 2003), as well as with other word processing sites that appears to have a multimodal function; i.e., for combining”
From Neural systems supporting lexical search guided by letter and semantic category cues: a self-paced overt response fMRI study of verbal fluency (2010) · cites this paper as Cohen et al., 2004
Cites
The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception
Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-11-04302.1997 · Cited by 7,738 · see citing works
From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure
Shallice, T. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511526817 · Cited by 4,072 · see citing works
Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral temporal cortex
Haxby, J. V., Gobbini, M. I., Furey, M. L., Ishai, A., Schouten, J. L., & Pietrini, P. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1063736 · Cited by 3,940 · see citing works
Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex
Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (1999) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/14819 · Cited by 3,309 · see citing works
A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body
Downing, P. E., Jiang, Y., Shuman, M., & Kanwisher, N. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1063414 · Cited by 2,043 · see citing works
Cohen, L., Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Lehéricy, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Hénaff, M.-A., & Michel, F. (2000) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/123.2.291 · Cited by 1,954 · see citing works
Self-citationBuilding Memories: Remembering and Forgetting of Verbal Experiences as Predicted by Brain Activity
Wagner, A. D., Schacter, D. L., Rotte, M., Koutstaal, W., Maril, A., Dale, A. M., Rosen, B. R., & Buckner, R. L. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.281.5380.1188 · Cited by 1,620 · see citing works
Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1982) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.89.1.60 · Cited by 1,530 · see citing works
The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus
McCandliss, B. D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00134-7 · Cited by 1,489 · see citing works
Self-citationInferotemporal cortex and object vision
Tanaka, K. (1996) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.19.030196.000545 · Cited by 1,402 · see citing works
Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming
Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Cohen, L., Bihan, D. L., Mangin, J.-F., Poline, J.-B., & Rivière, D. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/89551 · Cited by 1,305 · see citing works
Self-citationLanguage‐specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the Visual Word Form Area
Cohen, L., Lehéricy, S., Chochon, F., Lemer, C., Rivaud, S., & Dehaene, S. (2002) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awf094 · Cited by 1,254 · cited 6× · see citing works
“In Cohen et al. (2002), we indeed listed several studies that reported ventral fusiform activation during spoken word processing.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationPerceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material
Reicher, G. M. (1969) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027768 · Cited by 1,252 · see citing works
fMR-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons
Kalanit Grill-spector, A., & Malach, R. (2001) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/s0001-6918(01)00019-1 · Cited by 1,068 · see citing works
Disruption of posterior brain systems for reading in children with developmental dyslexia
Shaywitz, B. A., Shaywitz, S. E., Pugh, K. R., Mencl, W. E., Fulbright, R. K., Skudlarski, P., Constable, R. T., Marchione, K. E., Fletcher, J. M., Lyon, G. R., et al. (2002) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01365-3 · Cited by 993 · see citing works
Puce, A., Allison, T., Asgari, M., Gore, J. C., & McCarthy, G. (1996) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-16-05205.1996 · Cited by 987 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Puce et al. (1996) report single-subject activations during passive presentation of visual words, faces, and textures.”
BackgroundInfluentialShape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys
Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., & Poggio, T. (1995) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(95)00108-4 · Cited by 963 · see citing works
Allison, T. (1999) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/9.5.415 · Cited by 882 · see citing works
The fusiform “face area” is part of a network that processes faces at the individual level
Gauthier, I., Tarr, M. J., Moylan, J., Skudlarski, P., Gore, J. C., & Anderson, A. W. (2000) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892900562165 · Cited by 859 · see citing works
Activation of Extrastriate and Frontal Cortical Areas by Visual Words and Word-Like Stimuli
Petersen, S. E., Fox, P. T., Snyder, A. Z., & Raichle, M. E. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2396097 · Cited by 821 · see citing works
Word recognition in the human inferior temporal lobe
Nobre, A. C., Allison, T., & McCarthy, G. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/372260a0 · Cited by 789 · see citing works
Neural organization for the long-term memory of paired associates
Sakai, K., & Miyashita, Y. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/354152a0 · Cited by 743 · see citing works
The visual word form area: a prelexical representation of visual words in the fusiform gyrus
Dehaene, S., Le Clec’H, G., Poline, J.-B., Le Bihan, D., & Cohen, L. (2002) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/00001756-200203040-00015 · Cited by 727 · see citing works
Self-citationThe myth of the visual word form area
Price, C. J., & Devlin, J. T. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00084-3 · Cited by 689 · see citing works
Modulation of Parietal Activation by Semantic Distance in a Number Comparison Task
Pinel, P., Dehaene, S., Rivière, D., & Bihan, D. L. (2001) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0913 · Cited by 680 · see citing works
Self-citationA cultural effect on brain function
Paulesu, E., McCrory, E., Fazio, F., Menoncello, L., Brunswick, N., Cappa, S. F., Cotelli, M., Cossu, G., Corte, F., Lorusso, M., et al. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/71163 · Cited by 602 · see citing works
Eccentricity bias as an organizing principle for human high-order object areas
Hasson, U., Levy, I., Behrmann, M., Hendler, T., & Malach, R. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00662-1 · Cited by 578 · see citing works
Explicit and implicit processing of words and pseudowords by adult developmental dyslexics
Brunswick, N., McCrory, E., Price, C. J., Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (1999) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/122.10.1901 · Cited by 553 · see citing works
Category-specific visual responses of single neurons in the human medial temporal lobe
Kreiman, G., Christof Koch, A., & Fried, I. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/78868 · Cited by 547 · see citing works
Demonstrating the implicit processing of visually presented words and pseudowords
Price, C. J., Wise, R. J. S., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1996) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/6.1.62 · Cited by 544 · see citing works
Spatiotemporal dynamics of modality-specific and supramodal word processing
Marinkovic, K., Dhond, R. P., Dale, A. M., Glessner, M., Carr, V., & Halgren, E. (2003) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00197-1 · Cited by 520 · see citing works
Human extrastriate visual cortex and the perception of faces words numbers and colors
Allison, T., McCarthy, G., Nobre, A., Puce, A., & Belger, A. (1994) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/4.5.544 · Cited by 517 · see citing works
WARRINGTON, E. K., & SHALLICE, T. (1980) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/103.1.99 · Cited by 501 · see citing works
The anatomic basis of pure alexia
Damasio, A. R., & Damasio, H. (1983) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.33.12.1573 · Cited by 492 · see citing works
Dynamics of letter string perception in the human occipitotemporal cortex
Tarkiainen, A., Helenius, P., Hansen, P. C., Cornelissen, P. L., & Salmelin, R. (1999) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/122.11.2119 · Cited by 489 · see citing works
Naccache, L. (2001) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/11.10.966 · Cited by 436 · see citing works
Puce, A. (1999) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/9.5.445 · Cited by 422 · see citing works
Cohen, L. (2003) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhg079 · Cited by 400 · see citing works
Self-citationCastro-Caldas, A. (1998) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/121.6.1053 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
Fiez, J. A., Balota, D. A., Raichle, M. E., & Petersen, S. E. (1999) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80833-8 · Cited by 390 · see citing works
A multimodal language region in the ventral visual pathway
Büchel, C., Price, C., & Friston, K. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/28389 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
The role of segmentation in phonological processing: an fMRI investigation
Burton, M. W., Small, S. L., & Blumstein, S. E. (2000) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892900562309 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
Impaired visual word processing in dyslexia revealed with magnetoencephalography
Salmelin, R. H., Kiesilä, P., Uutela, K., Service, E., & Salonen, O. L. M. (1996) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410400206 · Cited by 371 · see citing works
Tsunoda, K., Yamane, Y., Nishizaki, M., & Tanifuji, M. (2001) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/90547 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
Reading as a Perceptual Process?
Kennedy, A., Radach, R. R., Heller, D., & Pynte, J. (2000) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-008043642-5/50001-2 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Letter Binding and Invariant Recognition of Masked Words: Behavioral and Neuroimaging Evidence
Dehaene, S., Jobert, A., Naccache, L., Ciuciu, P., Poline, J.-B., Le Bihan, D., & Cohen, L. (2004) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00674.x · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Self-citationDifferential effects of number of letters on word and nonword naming latency
Weekes, B. S. (1997) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A · doi:10.1080/027249897392170 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
Three-dimensional statistical analysis of sulcal variability in the human brain
Thompson, P. M., Schwartz, C., Lin, R. T., Khan, A. A., & Toga, A. W. (1996) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-13-04261.1996 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Contribution a l'etude anatomo-pathologique et clinique des differentes varietes de cecite verbale
Dejerine, J. (2000) · Neurocase · doi:10.1093/neucas/6.4.275 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
Large-scale mirror-symmetry organization of human occipito-temporal object areas
Hasson, U., Harel, M., Levy, I., & Malach, R. (2003) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00144-2 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition
Ziegler, J. C., & Ferrand, L. (1998) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03208845 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Functional Anatomy of Intra- and Cross-Modal Lexical Tasks
Booth, J. R., Burman, D. D., Meyer, J. R., Gitelman, D. R., Parrish, T. B., & Mesulam, M. M. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1081 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
The Processing of Single Words Studied with Positron Emission Tomography
Petersen, S. E., & Fiez, J. A. (1993) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.16.030193.002453 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Prosopagnosia: A Face-Specific Disorder
McNeil, J. E., & Warrington, E. K. (1993) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/14640749308401064 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Optical Imaging of Functional Organization in the Monkey Inferotemporal Cortex
Wang, G., Tanaka, K., & Tanifuji, M. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.272.5268.1665 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
Letter-by-letter Reading: Psychological Descriptions of a Neurologial Syndrome
Patterson, K. E., & Kay, J. (1982) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/14640748208400852 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Impact of learning on representation of parts and wholes in monkey inferotemporal cortex
Baker, C. I., Behrmann, M., & Olson, C. R. (2002) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn960 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
The remarkable inefficiency of word recognition
Pelli, D. G., Farell, B., & Moore, D. C. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01516 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
A Hierarchical Axis of Object Processing Stages in the Human Visual Cortex
Lerner, Y. (2001) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/11.4.287 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Neural Specialization for Letter Recognition
Polk, T. A., Stallcup, M., Aguirre, G. K., Alsop, D. C., D’Esposito, M., Detre, J. A., & Farah, M. J. (2002) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892902317236803 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Modality independence of word comprehension
Booth, J. R., Burman, D. D., Meyer, J. R., Gitelman, D. R., Parrish, T. B., & Mesulam, M. M. (2002) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.10054 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Inattentional Blindness Versus Inattentional Amnesia for Fixated But Ignored Words
Rees, G. E., Russell, C., Frith, C., & Driver, J. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5449.2504 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Brain Mechanisms for Reading Words and Pseudowords: an Integrated Approach
Simos, P. G. (2002) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/12.3.297 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
THE TOPOGRAPHY OF CALLOSAL READING PATHWAYS: A CASE-CONTROL ANALYSIS
BINDER, J. R., & MOHR, J. P. (1992) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/115.6.1807 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Sowell, E. R. (2002) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/12.1.17 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Tarkiainen, A., Cornelissen, P. L., & Salmelin, R. (2002) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awf112 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Xu, B. (2001) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/11.3.267 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Beauregard, M., Chertkow, H., Bub, D., Murtha, S., Dixon, R., & Evans, A. (1997) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1997.9.4.441 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Developing Normal Reading Skills: Aspects of the Visual Processes Underlying Word Recognition
Aghababian, V., & Nazir, T. A. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1006/jecp.1999.2540 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Brain mechanisms in normal and dyslexic readers
Temple, E. (2002) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(02)00303-3 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Functional MRI evidence for an abstract, not perceptual, word-form area.
Polk, T. A., & Farah, M. J. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.131.1.65 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Functional MRI evidence for an abstract, not perceptual, word-form area
Polk, T. A., & Farah, M. J. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.131.1.65 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
The Constraints Functional Neuroimaging Places on Classical Models of Auditory Word Processing
Giraud, A. L., & Price, C. J. (2001) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/08989290152541421 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
The pathophysiology of letter-by-letter reading
Cohen, L., Henry, C., Dehaene, S., Martinaud, O., Lehéricy, S., Lemer, C., & Sophie Ferrieux, A. (2004) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.04.018 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Self-citationA LITERATURE REVIEW AND NEW DATA SUPPORTING AN INTERACTIVE ACCOUNT OF LETTER-BY-LETTER READING
Behrmann, M., Plaut, D. C., & Nelson, J. (1998) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/026432998381212 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
The role of orthographic and phonotactic rules in perceiving letter patterns.
Spoehr, K. T., & Smith, E. E. (1975) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.1.1.21 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Alexia without agraphia or hemianopsia. Anatomical analysis of an autopsied case
GREENBLATT, S. H. (1973) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/96.2.307 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Multiple code activation in word recognition: evidence from rhyme monitoring
Donnenwerth-Nolan, S., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1981) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.7.3.170 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Relation between brain activation and lexical performance
Booth, J. R., Burman, D. D., Meyer, J. R., Gitelman, D. R., Parrish, T. B., & Mesulam, M. M. (2003) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.10111 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Visualizing the neural bases of a disconnection syndrome with diffusion tensor imaging
Molko, N., Cohen, L., Mangin, J. F., Chochon, F., Lehéricy, S., Bihan, D. L., & Dehaene, S. (2002) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/08989290260045864 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Self-citationPure Alexia as a Visual Impairment: A Reconsideration
Farah, M. J., & Wallace, M. A. (1991) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643299108253376 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Word shape's in poor shape for the race to the lexicon
Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., & Noel, R. W. (1984) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.10.3.413 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Visual complexity in letter-by-letter reading: Pure alexia is not pure
Behrmann, M., Nelson, J., & Sekuler, E. B. (1998) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00005-0 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Orthographic, phonological, and articulatory contributions to masked letter and word priming.
Bowers, J. S., Vigliocco, G., & Haan, R. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.24.6.1705 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Orthographic, phonological, and articulatory contributions to masked letter and word priming
Bowers, J. S., Vigliocco, G., & Haan, R. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.6.1705 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
The influence of orthography on phonological representations in the lexicon
Taft, M., & Hambly, G. (1985) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(85)90031-2 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Word shape's in poor shape for the race to the lexicon.
Paap, K. R., Newsome, S. L., & Noel, R. W. (1984) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.10.3.413 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Cortical localisation of the visual and auditory word form areas: A reconsideration of the evidence
Price, C. J., Winterburn, D., Giraud, A., Moore, C. J., & Noppeney, U. (2003) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/s0093-934x(02)00544-8 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
(2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429488542 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Number processing in pure alexia: The effect of hemispheric asymmetries and task demands
Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (1995) · Neurocase · doi:10.1080/13554799508402356 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Self-citationErickson, C. A., Jagadeesh, B., & Desimone, R. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/80664 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
VARIETIES OF PURE ALEXIA: THE CASE OF FAILURE TO ACCESS GRAPHEMIC REPRESENTATIONS
Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1998) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/026432998381267 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Where is the/b/in “absurde” [apsyrd]? It is in French listeners' minds
Hallé, P. A., Chéreau, C., & Segui, J. (2000) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.2000.2718 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Subangular alexia without agraphia or hemianopsia
Greenblatt, S. H. (1976) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/0093-934x(76)90019-5 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
From neuropsychology to mental structure
Beaumont, J. G. (1989) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/0301-0511(89)90038-0 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Disruption to word or letter processing? The origins of case-mixing effects.
Mayall, K., Humphreys, G. W., & Olson, A. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.23.5.1275 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Disruption to word or letter processing? The origins of case-mixing effects
Mayall, K., Humphreys, G. W., & Olson, A. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.23.5.1275 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Modulation of human extrastriate visual processing by selective attention to colours and words
Nobre, A. C. (1998) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/121.7.1357 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Basic processes in reading: computation of abstract letter identities
Besner, D., Coltheart, M., & Davelaar, E. (1984) · Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie · doi:10.1037/h0080785 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Burgund, E. D., & Marsolek, C. J. (1997) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1006/brcg.1997.0940 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Word Length and Orthographic Neighborhood Size Effects in the Left and Right Cerebral Hemispheres
Michal Lavidor, B., & Ellis, A. W. (2002) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1006/brln.2001.2583 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Visual field effects in the discrimination of sine-wave gratings
Kitterle, F. L., & Selig, L. M. (1991) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03212201 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Associative visual agnosia without alexia
ALBERT, M. L., RECHES, A., & SILVERBERG, R. (1975) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.25.4.322 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Object-form topology in the ventral temporal lobe
Haxby, J. V., Ishai, A., Chao, L. L., Ungerleider, L. G., & Martin, A. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01423-0 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Traces of Print Along the Visual Pathway
Nazir, T. A. (2000) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-008043642-5/50003-6 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Dissociation of letter and picture naming resulting from callosal disconnection
Suzuki, K., Yamadori, A., Endo, K., Fujii, T., Ezura, M., & Takahashi, A. (1998) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.51.5.1390 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Gomori, A. J., & Hawryluk, G. A. (1984) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.34.7.947 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Pure alexia: clinical-pathologic evidence for a lateralized visual language association cortex.
Beversdorf, D. Q., Nr, R., Ch, R., & Reeves, A. G. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Analysis of standard and non-standard visual word format in the two hemispheres
Lavidor, M., Babkoff, H., & Faust, M. (2001) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(00)00125-1 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Hanley, J. R., & Kay, J. (1996) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(96)00039-5 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Besner, D. (1989) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/14640748908402354 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Differential Processing of Phonographic and Logographic Single-Digit Numbers by the Two Hemispheres
Holender, D., & Peereman, R. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429488542-3 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Alexia without agraphia or hemianopia in parietal infarction.
Iragui, V. J., & Kritchevsky, M. (1991) · Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.54.9.841 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Optic aphasia with pure alexia: a mild form of visual associative agnosia? A case study
Chanoine, V., Ferreira, C. T., Demonet, J. F., Nespoulous, J. L., & Poncet, M. (1998) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70766-4 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Montant, M., & Behrmann, M. (2000) · Neurocase · doi:10.1080/13554790008402777 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Right Hemifield Alexia Without Hemianopia
Castro‐Caldas, A., & Salgado, V. S. (1984) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.1984.04050130090031 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Pirozzolo, F. J., Kerr, K. L., Obrzut, J. E., Morley, G. K., Haxby, J. V., & Lundgren, S. (1981) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.44.2.152 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Bush (1998) · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0193(1998)6:4
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Price, C. J. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.062 · Cited by 2,159 · see citing works
The unique role of the visual word form area in reading
Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.04.003 · Cited by 1,396 · see citing works
Self-citationCultural Recycling of Cortical Maps
Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.004 · Cited by 1,336 · see citing works
Self-citationHow Learning to Read Changes the Cortical Networks for Vision and Language
Dehaene, S., Pegado, F., Braga, L. W., Ventura, P., Filho, G. N., Jobert, A., Dehaene‐Lambertz, G., Kolinsky, R., Morais, J., & Cohen, L. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1194140 · Cited by 1,277 · see citing works
Self-citationThe neural code for written words: a proposal
Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Sigman, M., & Vinckier, F. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.004 · Cited by 1,137 · see citing works
Self-citationFrom cognitive to neural models of working memory
D’Esposito, M. (2007) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2086 · Cited by 792 · see citing works
Tsao, D. Y., & Livingstone, M. S. (2008) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094238 · Cited by 652 · see citing works
Neuroscience and education: from research to practice?
Goswami, U. (2006) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1907 · Cited by 647 · see citing works
Rivera, S. M., Reiss, A. L., Eckert, M. A., & Menon, V. (2005) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi055 · Cited by 620 · see citing works
Neural mechanisms of attentional control in mindfulness meditation
Malinowski, P. (2013) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00008 · Cited by 547 · see citing works
A Revised Neural Framework for Face Processing
Duchaine, B., & Yovel, G. (2015) · Annual Review of Vision Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-vision-082114-035518 · Cited by 520 · see citing works
Domain Specificity in Visual Cortex
Downing, P. E., Chan, A. W.-Y., Peelen, M. V., Dodds, C. M., & Kanwisher, N. (2005) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj086 · Cited by 512 · see citing works
Martino, J., Brogna, C., Robles, S. G., Vergani, F., & Duffau, H. (2010) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2009.07.015 · Cited by 476 · see citing works
Sequential Processing of Lexical, Grammatical, and Phonological Information Within Broca’s Area
Sahin, N. T., Pinker, S., Cash, S. S., Schomer, D., & Halgren, E. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1174481 · Cited by 452 · see citing works
Raphaël Gaillard, B., Naccache, L., Pinel, P., Clémenceau, S., Emmanuelle Volle, C., Hasboun, D., Dupont, S., Baulac, M., Dehaene, S., Adam, C., et al. (2006) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.03.031 · Cited by 440 · see citing works
Self-citationBaker, C. I., Jia Liu, B., Wald, L. L., Kwong, K. K., Benner, T., & Kanwisher, N. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0703300104 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Neurocognitive Mechanisms of Synesthesia
Hubbard, E. M., & Ramachandran, V. S. (2005) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.10.012 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition
Carreiras, M., Armstrong, B. C., Perea, M., & Frost, R. (2013) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.11.005 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
Birn, R. M., Kenworthy, L., Case, L., Caravella, R., Jones, T. B., Bandettini, P. A., & Martin, A. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.07.036 · Cited by 377 · see citing works
Individual Differences among Grapheme-Color Synesthetes: Brain-Behavior Correlations
Hubbard, E. M., Arman, A. C., Ramachandran, V. S., & Boynton, G. M. (2005) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.02.008 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Martin, A., Schurz, M., Kronbichler, M., & Richlan, F. (2015) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22749 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
The role of selective attention on academic foundations: A cognitive neuroscience perspective
Stevens, C., & Bavelier, D. (2011) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2011.11.001 · Cited by 330 · see citing works
Moore, A., Gruber, T., Derose, J., & Malinowski, P. (2012) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00018 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Converging language streams in the human temporal lobe
Spitsyna, G., Warren, J. E., Scott, S. K., Turkheimer, F. E., & Wise, R. J. S. (2006) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0559-06.2006 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Seeing faces is necessary for face-domain formation
Arcaro, M. J., Schade, P. F., Vincent, J. L., Ponce, C. R., & Livingstone, M. S. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4635 · Cited by 311 · see citing works
Blau, V., Reithler, J., van Atteveldt, N., Seitz, J., Gerretsen, P., Goebel, R., & Blomert, L. (2010) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awp308 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
The Role of the Posterior Fusiform Gyrus in Reading
Devlin, J. T., Jamison, H. L., Gonnerman, L. M., & Matthews, P. M. (2006) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.6.911 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
Cortical Representations of Symbols, Objects, and Faces Are Pruned Back during Early Childhood
Cantlon, J. F., Pinel, P., Dehaene, S., & Pelphrey, K. A. (2010) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq078 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Self-citationStriem-Amit, E., Cohen, L., Dehaene, S., & Amedi, A. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.08.026 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Self-citationTuning of the human left fusiform gyrus to sublexical orthographic structure
Binder, J. R., Medler, D. A., Westbury, C. F., Liebenthal, E., & Buchanan, L. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.053 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Coarse neural tuning for print peaks when children learn to read
Maurer, U., Brem, S., Princz-Kranz, F. L., Bücher, K., Benz, R., Halder, P., Steinhausen, H., & Brandeis, D. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.025 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
How Has the Internet Reshaped Human Cognition?
Loh, K. K., & Kanai, R. (2016) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858415595005 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Sensori-motor experience leads to changes in visual processing in the developing brain
James, K. H. (2010) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00883.x · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Distinct unimodal and multimodal regions for word processing in the left temporal cortex
Cohen, L., Jobert, A., Bihan, D. L., & Dehaene, S. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.052 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Self-citationWehbe, L., Murphy, B., Talukdar, P. P., Fyshe, A., Ramdas, A., & Mitchell, T. M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0112575 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Developmental Dyscalculia: heterogeneity might not mean different mechanisms
Rubinsten, O., & Henik, A. (2009) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.002 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Reading and reading disturbance
Price, C. J., & Mechelli, A. (2005) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.003 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Stroth, S., Kubesch, S., Dieterle, K., Ruchsow, M., Heim, R., & Kiefer, M. (2009) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.02.073 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Disruption of functional networks in dyslexia: a whole-brain, data-driven analysis of connectivity
Finn, E. S., Shen, X., Holahan, J. M., Scheinost, D., Lacadie, C., Papademetris, X., Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., & Constable, R. T. (2014) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.08.031 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Hypnotic suggestion reduces conflict in the human brain
Raz, A., Fan, J., & Posner, M. I. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0503064102 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Kiefer, M., & Martens, U. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0019561 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Parietal Cortex Mediates Voluntary Control of Spatial and Nonspatial Auditory Attention
Shomstein, S., & Yantis, S. (2006) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4408-05.2006 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Evidence for developmental changes in the visual word processing network beyond adolescence
Brem, S., Bucher, K., Halder, P., Summers, P., Dietrich, T., Martin, E., & Brandeis, D. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.023 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Specialization for written words over objects in the visual cortex
Marcin Szwed, A., Dehaene, S., Kleinschmidt, A. K., Eger, E., Valabrègue, R., Amadon, A., & Cohen, L. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.073 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Self-citationLetter processing automatically recruits a sensory–motor brain network
James, K. H., & Gauthier, L. (2006) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.06.026 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Hutzler, F. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.075 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Taxi vs. Taksi: On Orthographic Word Recognition in the Left Ventral Occipitotemporal Cortex
Kronbichler, M., Bergmann, J., Hutzler, F., Staffen, W., Mair, A., Ladurner, G., & Wimmer, H. (2007) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.10.1584 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
A short review on emotion processing: a lateralized network of neuronal networks
Palomero‐Gallagher, N., & Amunts, K. (2021) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-021-02331-7 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Proklova, D., KAISER, D. H., & Peelen, M. V. (2016) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00924 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Understanding the functional neuroanatomy of acquired prosopagnosia
Sorger, B., Goebel, R., Schiltz, C., & Rossion, B. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.051 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Lerma‐Usabiaga, G., Carreiras, M., & Paz‐Alonso, P. M. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1803003115 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Buchweitz, A., Mason, R. A., Tomitch, L. M. B., & Just, M. A. (2009) · Psychology & Neuroscience · doi:10.3922/j.psns.2009.2.003 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Letter processing in the visual system: Different activation patterns for single letters and strings
James, K. H., James, T. W., Jobard, G., Wong, A. C. ‐., & Gauthier, L. (2005) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.5.4.452 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Dehaene, S., Nakamura, K., Jobert, A., Kuroki, C., Ogawa, S., & Cohen, L. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.024 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Self-citationThe joint development of hemispheric lateralization for words and faces.
Dundas, E. M., Plaut, D. C., & Behrmann, M. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0029503 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Xue, G., Chen, C., Jin, Z. H., & Dong, Q. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.055 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
The Literate Brain: The Relationship between Spelling and Reading
Rapp, B. C., & Lipka, K. (2010) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21507 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Peyrin, C., Lallier, M., Démonet, J., Pernet, C. R., Baciu, M. V., Bas, J. F. L., & Valdois, S. (2012) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2011.12.015 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Nonconscious semantic processing of emotional words modulates conscious access
Gaillard, R., Cul, A. D., Naccache, L., Vinckier, F., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0600584103 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Self-citationNovel domain formation reveals proto-architecture in inferotemporal cortex
Srihasam, K., Vincent, J. L., & Livingstone, M. S. (2014) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3855 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Neurophysiology of synesthesia
Hubbard, E. M. (2007) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-007-0018-6 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
The roles of the “visual word form area” in reading
Hillis, A. E., Newhart, M., Heidler, J., Barker, P. B., Herskovits, E. H., & Degaonkar, M. N. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.08.026 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Complementary neural representations for faces and words: A computational exploration
Plaut, D. C., & Behrmann, M. (2011) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643294.2011.609812 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Behrmann, M., & Plaut, D. C. (2012) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs390 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Tuning of the visual word processing system: Distinct developmental ERP and fMRI effects
Brem, S., Halder, P., Bücher, K., Summers, P. E., Martin, E., & Brandeis, D. (2009) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20751 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Caspers, J., Zilles, K., Eickhoff, S. B., Schleicher, A., Mohlberg, H., & Amunts, K. (2012) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-012-0411-8 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
The contribution of phonological awareness and visual attention in early reading and spelling
Plaza, M., & Cohen, H. (2006) · Dyslexia · doi:10.1002/dys.330 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
A hierarchical model of the evolution of human brain specializations
Barrett, H. C. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1201898109 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
The objectification of overlearned sequences: A new view of spatial sequence synesthesia
Eagleman, D. M. (2009) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2009.06.012 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
The VWFA: it's not just for words anymore
Vogel, A. C., Petersen, S. E., & Schlaggar, B. L. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00088 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Burton, M. W., LoCasto, P. C., Krebs-Noble, D., & Gullapalli, R. P. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.024 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Structural anatomy of pure and hemianopic alexia
Leff, A. P. (2006) · Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.2005.086983 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Auditory Selective Attention to Speech Modulates Activity in the Visual Word Form Area
Yoncheva, Y. N., Zevin, J. D., Maurer, U., & McCandliss, B. D. (2009) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp129 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Pinel, P., & Dehaene, S. (2009) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21184 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Self-citationRapp, B. C., & Dufor, O. (2011) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00109 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
The Visual Word Form Area: Evidence from an fMRI study of implicit processing of Chinese characters
Liu, C., Zhang, W.-T., Tang, Y., Mai, X.-Q., Chen, H.-C., Tardif, T. Z., & Luo, Y.-J. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.014 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Abstract Grammatical Processing of Nouns and Verbs in Broca's Area: Evidence from FMRI
Sahin, N. T., Pinker, S. A., & Halgren, E. (2006) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70394-0 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Dien, J. (2008) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.08.024 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Neuroscience and Reading: A Review for Reading Education Researchers
Hruby, G. G., & Goswami, U. (2011) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1598/rrq.46.2.4 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Explaining Function with Anatomy: Language Lateralization and Corpus Callosum Size
Josse, G., Seghier, M. L., Kherif, F., & Price, C. J. (2008) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4383-08.2008 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
The Visual What For Area: Words and pictures in the left fusiform gyrus
Starrfelt, R., & Gerlach, C. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.12.003 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
He, C., Peelen, M. V., Han, Z., Lin, N., Caramazza, A., & Bi, Y. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.051 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Two New Cytoarchitectonic Areas on the Human Mid-Fusiform Gyrus
Lorenz, S., Weiner, K. S., Caspers, J., Mohlberg, H., Schleicher, A., Bludau, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Kalanit Grill-spector, A., Zilles, K., & Amunts, K. (2015) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv225 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Dien, J. (2008) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.04.013 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Arithmetic in the Child and Adult Brain
Menon, V. (2014) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642342.013.041 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Abdulhadi (2011) · doi:10.1093/wsr/wsr014 · Cited by 118 · see citing works
The Neural Correlates of Speech Motor Sequence Learning
Segawa, J. A., Tourville, J. A., Beal, D. S., & Guenther, F. H. (2014) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00737 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Peyrin, C., Démonet, J., Nguyen-Morel, M.-A., Bas, J. F. L., & Valdois, S. (2010) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2010.06.005 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Orthographic effects in spoken language: On-line activation or phonological restructuring?
Perre, L., Pattamadilok, C., Montant, M., & Ziegler, J. C. (2009) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.04.018 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Sensitivity to orthographic familiarity in the occipito-temporal region.
Bruno, J. L., Zumberge, A., Manis, F. R., Lu, Z.-L., & Goldman, J. G. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.044 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Schurz, M., Sturm, D., Richlan, F., Kronbichler, M., Ladurner, G., & Wimmer, H. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.082 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
A Temporal Bottleneck in the Language Comprehension Network
Vagharchakian, L., Dehaene‐Lambertz, G., Pallier, C., & Dehaene, S. (2012) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5685-11.2012 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Self-citationNeural regions essential for reading and spelling of words and pseudowords
Philipose, L. E., Gottesman, R. F., Newhart, M., Kleinman, J. T., Herskovits, E. H., Pawlak, M. A., Marsh, E. B., Davis, C. L., Heidler‐Gary, J., & Hillis, A. E. (2007) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.21182 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Véronique Boulenger, A., Silber, B. Y., Roy, A. C., Paulignan, Y., Jeannerod, M., & Nazir, T. A. (2008) · Journal of Physiology-Paris · doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.015 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Principles of Learning, Implications for Teaching: A Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective
Goswami, U. (2008) · Journal of Philosophy of Education · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9752.2008.00639.x · Cited by 111 · see citing works
A combined fMRI study of typed spelling and reading
Purcell, J. J., Napoliello, E. M., & Eden, G. F. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.042 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Evans, T. M., Kochalka, J., Ngoon, T. J., Wu, S. S., Qin, S., Battista, C., & Menon, V. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0216-15.2015 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Behavioral and Anatomical Consequences of Early versus Late Symbol Training in Macaques
Srihasam, K., Mandeville, J. B., Mórocz, I. Á., Sullivan, K., & Livingstone, M. S. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.12.022 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Ripamonti, E., Aggujaro, S., Molteni, F., Zonca, G., Frustaci, M., & Luzzatti, C. (2014) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2014.04.001 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Glezer, L. S., Kim, J. S., Rule, J., Jiang, X., & Riesenhuber, M. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4031-14.2015 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S.
- Affiliations
- Inserm (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Cohen, Laurent
- Venue
- NeuroImage
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-05
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 466-476
- ISSN
- 1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2018304854
- Semantic Scholar
- c97c894ecdafa03fd140acc8f7877c7734b43e73
- Cited by
- 776
- References
- 116
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 46
- FWCI
- 54.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- visual word form area, ventral stream, visual word recognition, reading, functional specialization, regional selectivity, pure alexia, letter recognition, inferotemporal cortex, reading acquisition
- MeSH terms
- Dyslexia, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neuropsychological Tests, Occipital Lobe, Reading, Temporal Lobe, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Visual Perception, Magnetoencephalography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review