The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Accessibility of Pronominal Antecedents as a Function of Episode Shifts in Narrative Text
Abstract
One of the characteristics of connected discourse is that entities introduced are often referred to again at a later point. Such anaphoric reference clearly necessitates a memory representation of the prior text, so that the new reference can be established as coreferential with the old. In this paper, a distinction is made between people introduced in a narrative who depend upon a particular setting in order to be interpreted (scenario-dependent entities), and those who do not (main characters). It is argued that the availability of representations of these two types of character in working memory will depend upon whether the text indicates a change in setting to have occurred. Two experiments are described which show that dependent entities become less available if a change has occurred, while main characters are not so affected. The first study uses incidence of mention in a passage continuation procedure as an index of availability, while the second uses reading time and question-answering latencies. The experiments rule out any simple view that availability depends only upon how far back in the text a character was mentioned, and illustrate how passage of time in a narrative serves as a cue for recognizing the end of an episode.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toward a model of text comprehension and production.
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.85.5.363 · Cited by 5,298
A FRAMEWORK FOR REPRESENTING KNOWLEDGE
Minsky, M. (1988) · Readings in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-1446-7.50018-2 · Cited by 4,536
Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding
Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (2013) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203781036 · Cited by 3,155
The psychology of computer vision
Winston, P. H. (1976) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/0031-3203(76)90020-0 · Cited by 2,569
Bergum, B. O., Long, J., & Baddeley, A. (1982) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1422199 · Cited by 2,226
Grimes, J. E. (1975) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110886474 · Cited by 792
Speech, place, and action : studies in deixis and related topics
Jarvella, R. J., & Klein, W. (1982) · Cited by 551
SOME PRINCIPLES OF MEMORY SCHEMATA
Bobrow, D. G., & Norman, D. A. (1975) · Representation and Understanding · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-108550-6.50010-0 · Cited by 460
The representation and use of focus in dialogue understanding.
Grosz, B. J. (1977) · University of California, Berkeley eBooks · Cited by 419
Understanding Written Language
(2006) · Contemporary Psychology · doi:10.4324/9780203137703-9 · Cited by 383
Cited by
Situation models in language comprehension and memory
Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162 · Cited by 2,877
Segmentation in reading and film comprehension.
Zacks, J. M., Speer, N. K., & Reynolds, J. R. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0015305 · Cited by 349
Do readers mentally represent characters' emotional states?
Gernsbacher, M. A., Goldsmith, H. H., & Robertson, R. R. W. (1992) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699939208411061 · Cited by 334
Effects of negation and situational presence on the accessibility of text information.
Kaup, B., & Zwaan, R. A. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29.3.439 · Cited by 262
Keysar, B. (1997) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/01638539709545015 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, A., Garrod, S. C., & Sanford, A. J.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1983-05
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 427-440
- ISSN
- 0272-4987 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0740
- OpenAlex
- W2231597753
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 1.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Accessibility of Pronominal Antecedents as a Function of Episode Shifts in Narrative Text. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/14640748308402480
- The paper
- Anderson, A., Garrod, S. C., & Sanford, A. J. (1983). The Accessibility of Pronominal Antecedents as a Function of Episode Shifts in Narrative Text. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748308402480
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.