The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Privileged Access by Irrelevant Speech to Short-term Memory: The Role of Changing State
Abstract
Memory for visually presented items is impaired by speech that is played as an irrelevant background. The paper presents the view that changing state of the auditory material is an important prerequisite for this disruption. Four experiments studied the effects of sounds varying in complexity in an attempt to establish which features of changing state in the auditory signal lead to diminished recall. Simple unvarying or repetitive speech sounds were not sufficient to induce the irrelevant speech effect (Experiment 1): in addition, simple analogues of speech, possessing regular or irregular envelopes and using a range of carriers, failed to imitate the action of speech (Experiment 2). Variability of between-utterance phonology in the irrelevant stream (Experiment 3) emerged as a crucial factor. Moreover, predictability of the syllable sequence did not reduce the degree of disruption (Experiment 4) suggesting that supra-syllabic characteristics of the speech are of little importance. The results broadly support the idea that disruption of short-term memory only occurs when the speech stream changes in state. It is argued that disruption occurs in memory when cues to serial order based on phonological representations of heard material interfere with the phonological codes of visual origin. It is suggested that cues to changing state of the speech input contaminate those associated with items of visual origin, which are already in a phonological store.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound
Bregman, A. S. (1990) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1486.001.0001 · Cited by 3,284
The Biology and Evolution of Language.
Beck, B. B., & Lieberman, P. (1985) · Man · doi:10.2307/2802450 · Cited by 1,172
Salamé, P., & Baddeley, A. (1982) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(82)90521-7 · Cited by 902
Memory updating in working memory: The role of the central executive
Morris, N., & Jones, D. M. (1990) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1990.tb02349.x · Cited by 734
Self-citationAcoustic masking in primary memory
Colle, H. A., & Welsh, A. (1976) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(76)90003-7 · Cited by 501
Effects of Background Music on Phonological Short-Term Memory
Salamé, P., & Baddeley, A. (1989) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/14640748908402355 · Cited by 467
Attention: selection, awareness, and control.
Neidermeyer, E. (1994) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(94)90076-0 · Cited by 440
Auditory Frequency Selectivity
Moore, B. C. J., & Patterson, R. D. (1986) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-2247-4 · Cited by 337
Disruption of proofreading by irrelevant speech: Effects of attention, arousal or memory?
Jones, D. M., Miles, C., & Page, J. (1990) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.2350040203 · Cited by 228
Self-citationReading comprehension in the presence of unattended speech and music
Martin, R. C., Wogalter, M. S., & Forlano, J. G. (1988) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(88)90063-0 · Cited by 222
Cited by
The multi-component model of working memory: Explorations in experimental cognitive psychology
RepovŠ, G., & Baddeley, A. (2006) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.12.061 · Cited by 795
Benchmarks for models of short-term and working memory.
Oberauer, K., Lewandowsky, S., Awh, E., Brown, G. D. A., Conway, A., Cowan, N., Donkin, C., Farrell, S., Hitch, G. J., Hurlstone, M. J., et al. (2018) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000153 · Cited by 447
Office noise and employee concentration: Identifying causes of disruption and potential improvements
Banbury, S., & Berry, D. (2005) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140130412331311390 · Cited by 349
Kaarlela-Tuomaala, A., Helenius, R., Keskinen, E., & Hongisto, V. (2009) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140130903154579 · Cited by 302
Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory
Neath, I. (2000) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03214356 · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, D., Madden, C., & Miles, C.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1992-05
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 645-669
- ISSN
- 0272-4987 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0740
- OpenAlex
- W2035754816
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 3.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Privileged Access by Irrelevant Speech to Short-term Memory: The Role of Changing State. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/14640749208401304
- The paper
- Jones, D., Madden, C., & Miles, C. (1992). Privileged Access by Irrelevant Speech to Short-term Memory: The Role of Changing State. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749208401304
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.