The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Human Rights and Capabilities
Abstract
The two concepts — human rights and capabilities — go well with each other, so long as we do not try to subsume either concept entirely within the territory of the other. There are many human rights that can be seen as rights to particular capabilities. However, human rights to important process freedoms cannot be adequately analysed within the capability framework. Furthermore, both human rights and capabilities have to depend on the process of public reasoning. The methodology of public scrutiny draws on Rawlsian understanding of ‘objectivity’ in ethics, but the impartiality that is needed cannot be confined within the borders of a nation. Public reasoning without territorial confinement is important for both.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, perspectives such as Occupational Justice (90) and the Capabilities Framework (91, 92) ground an understanding of what people can do and be in the structural and contextual conditions that support or restrict possibilities for doing, and thereby could locate time use scholarship and practice in the realm of social justice.”
From Contributions of a time use perspective in community mental health practice: a scoping review (2024) · cites this paper as [91]
Citations
Cites
Sen, A. K. (2009) · doi:10.1007/978-1-137-28787-8_94 · Cited by 15,887
Self-citationAn Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations
Smith, A. C. (1776) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oseo/instance.00043218 · Cited by 14,343
Jennifer A. Clapp (University of Waterloo), & Sen, A. K. (1999) · International Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis · doi:10.2307/40203469 · Cited by 13,603
Self-citationA Theory of Justice: Original Edition
Rawls, J. (1971) · doi:10.4159/9780674042605 · Cited by 9,496
The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order
(1997) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/s0024-6301(97)80966-1 · Cited by 7,466
Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach
Nussbaum, M. C. (2000) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511841286 · Cited by 6,103
The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of the World Order
Evans, P., & Huntington, S. P. (1997) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2654621 · Cited by 4,894
Seabright, P. (1993) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0198287976.001.0001 · Cited by 4,253
Sugden, R., & Sen, A. (1986) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232999 · Cited by 4,081
Self-citationWomen and human development: the capabilities approach
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-0369 · Cited by 3,718
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Cohen GA, 1993, The Quality of Life
- Cohen GA, 1995, The New Left Review, 117
- Himmelfarb G, 1996, For Love of Country
- Lukes S, 1997, The Human Rights Reader
- Marx K, 1845, The German Ideology
- Rawls J, 1993, Political Liberalism
- Sen A, 1985, The Standard of Living
- 2004, Human Development Report 2004
- Williams B, 1987, Amartya Sen et al, The Standard of Living
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Defining Environmental Justice
Schlosberg, D. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199286294.001.0001 · Cited by 2,010
Distributive justice and equity in transportation
Pereira, R. H. M., Schwanen, T., & Banister, D. (2016) · Transport Reviews · doi:10.1080/01441647.2016.1257660 · Cited by 1,192
“It ought to take into account each society’s particular values and material conditions, and may even change across time as societies develop and reassess their political positions (Sen, 2005, 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialWellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice
Robeyns, I. (2017) · Open Book Publishers · doi:10.11647/obp.0130 · Cited by 1,142
Napier, A. D., Ancarno, C., Butler, B., Calabrese, J., Chater, A., Chatterjee, H., Guesnet, F., Horne, R., Jacyna, S., Jadhav, S., et al. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61603-2 · Cited by 849
What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally
Taylor, L. (2017) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951717736335 · Cited by 802
“Many states and regions, for example, take a perspective on rights that frames them as inseparable from corresponding duties, and also addresses the individual as part of the larger collective (Sen, 2005).”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Sen, A.
- Corresponding author
- Sen, Amartya
- ORCID
- Sen, Amartya
- Venue
- Journal of Human Development
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 151-166
- ISSN
- 1464-9888 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9516
- OpenAlex
- W2096196718
- Semantic Scholar
- 311a84649880fb6eb22f842a46b1f98bee415a2a
- Cited by
- 1,966
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 83 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 147 · 2023: 131 · 2022: 158 · 2021: 157 · 2020: 187 · 2019: 142 · 2018: 132 · 2017: 110 · 2016: 107 · 2015: 85 · 2014: 95 · 2013: 90 · 2012: 53
- FWCI
- 103.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Human Development (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Università degli Studi di Pavia
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Human Rights and Development
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal Rights and Human Rights
- Keywords
- human rights, capability approach, John Rawls, public reasoning, impartial spectator
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
