The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Human Rights and Capabilities
Abstract
The two concepts — human rights and capabilities — go well with each other, so long as we do not try to subsume either concept entirely within the territory of the other. There are many human rights that can be seen as rights to particular capabilities. However, human rights to important process freedoms cannot be adequately analysed within the capability framework. Furthermore, both human rights and capabilities have to depend on the process of public reasoning. The methodology of public scrutiny draws on Rawlsian understanding of ‘objectivity’ in ethics, but the impartiality that is needed cannot be confined within the borders of a nation. Public reasoning without territorial confinement is important for both.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, perspectives such as Occupational Justice (90) and the Capabilities Framework (91, 92) ground an understanding of what people can do and be in the structural and contextual conditions that support or restrict possibilities for doing, and thereby could locate time use scholarship and practice in the realm of social justice.”
From Contributions of a time use perspective in community mental health practice: a scoping review (2024) · cites this paper as [91]
Citations
Cites
Sen, A. K. (2009) · doi:10.1007/978-1-137-28787-8_94 · Cited by 15,887
Self-citationAn Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations
Smith, A. C. (1776) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oseo/instance.00043218 · Cited by 14,343
Jennifer A. Clapp (University of Waterloo), & Sen, A. K. (1999) · International Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis · doi:10.2307/40203469 · Cited by 13,603
Self-citationA Theory of Justice: Original Edition
Rawls, J. (1971) · doi:10.4159/9780674042605 · Cited by 9,496
The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order
(1997) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/s0024-6301(97)80966-1 · Cited by 7,466
Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach
Nussbaum, M. C. (2000) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511841286 · Cited by 6,103
The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of the World Order
Evans, P., & Huntington, S. P. (1997) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2654621 · Cited by 4,894
Seabright, P. (1993) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/0198287976.001.0001 · Cited by 4,253
Sugden, R., & Sen, A. (1986) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2232999 · Cited by 4,081
Self-citationWomen and human development: the capabilities approach
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-0369 · Cited by 3,718
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Cohen GA, 1993, The Quality of Life
- Cohen GA, 1995, The New Left Review, 117
- Himmelfarb G, 1996, For Love of Country
- Lukes S, 1997, The Human Rights Reader
- Marx K, 1845, The German Ideology
- Rawls J, 1993, Political Liberalism
- Sen A, 1985, The Standard of Living
- 2004, Human Development Report 2004
- Williams B, 1987, Amartya Sen et al, The Standard of Living
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Defining Environmental Justice
Schlosberg, D. (2007) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199286294.001.0001 · Cited by 2,010
Distributive justice and equity in transportation
Pereira, R. H. M., Schwanen, T., & Banister, D. (2016) · Transport Reviews · doi:10.1080/01441647.2016.1257660 · Cited by 1,192
“It ought to take into account each society’s particular values and material conditions, and may even change across time as societies develop and reassess their political positions (Sen, 2005, 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialWellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice
Robeyns, I. (2017) · Open Book Publishers · doi:10.11647/obp.0130 · Cited by 1,142
Napier, A. D., Ancarno, C., Butler, B., Calabrese, J., Chater, A., Chatterjee, H., Guesnet, F., Horne, R., Jacyna, S., Jadhav, S., et al. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61603-2 · Cited by 849
What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally
Taylor, L. (2017) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951717736335 · Cited by 802
“Many states and regions, for example, take a perspective on rights that frames them as inseparable from corresponding duties, and also addresses the individual as part of the larger collective (Sen, 2005).”
BackgroundInfluentialValuing the ICECAP capability index for older people
Coast, J., Flynn, T. N., Natarajan, L., Sproston, K., Lewis, J., Louviere, J. J., & Peters, T. J. (2008) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.05.015 · Cited by 560
“Indeed, in a recent paper Sen refers to ‘‘the need for open valuational scrutiny for making social judgements’’ (Sen, 2005).”
BackgroundIndigenous Struggles, Environmental Justice, and Community Capabilities
Schlosberg, D., & Carruthers, D. (2010) · Global Environmental Politics · doi:10.1162/glep_a_00029 · Cited by 554
“Sen 2005, 158.”
Mariën, S., Hooghe, M., & Quintelier, E. (2009) · Political Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00801.x · Cited by 521
“If citizens do not have sufficient resources to employ their capacities for civic action, this should be considered a form of structural inequality (Sen,2005).”
BackgroundChildren and young people’s rights in the digital age: An emerging agenda
Livingstone, S., & Third, A. (2017) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444816686318 · Cited by 556
“Sen (2005) argues that, just as his capabilities approach emphasizes the importance of ‘what a person is able to do or be’ (p. 153), ‘human rights are best seen as rights to certain specific freedoms’ (p. 152).”
BackgroundClimate Justice and Capabilities: A Framework for Adaptation Policy
Schlosberg, D. (2012) · Ethics & International Affairs · doi:10.1017/s0892679412000615 · Cited by 400
Adolescent Well-Being: A Definition and Conceptual Framework
Ross, D. A., Hinton, R., Melles-Brewer, M., Engel, D. M. C., Zeck, W., Fagan, L., Herat, J., Phaladi, G., Imbago-Jácome, D., Anyona, P., et al. (2020) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.06.042 · Cited by 351
“Such objective indicators commonly re fl ect capabilities, which include both an individual ’ s functioning and the opportunities provided in a given environment, as argued by Sen [13].”
The Capability Approach: Its Development, Critiques and Recent Advances.
Clark, D. A. (2005) · Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) · Cited by 257
Crocker, D. A., & Robeyns, I. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511800511.005 · Cited by 251
Individuals and Identity in Economics
Davis, J. B. (2010) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511782237 · Cited by 245
Rossi, A. (2013) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.02.002 · Cited by 232
Strong sustainability in coastal areas: a conceptual interpretation of SDG 14
Neumann, B., Ott, K., & Kenchington, R. A. (2017) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-017-0472-y · Cited by 254
“The humanitarian sustainability-approach has been recently theorised via the so-called ‘‘capability approach’’ (CA) (Sen 1999, 2005; Nussbaum 2003, 2006; Robeyns 2005; for critical debate see Ott 2014).”
MethodFukuda‐Parr, S., Yamin, A. E., & Greenstein, J. P. (2014) · Journal of Human Development and Capabilities · doi:10.1080/19452829.2013.864622 · Cited by 228
“While human rights and human development are distinct conceptual frameworks, each with its own intellectual origins and histories, they are closely related6 (UN OHCHR 2006; Sen 2005; Vizard, Fukuda-Parr, and Elson 2011).”
BackgroundBiggeri, M., Libanora, R., Mariani, S., & Menchini, L. (2006) · Journal of Human Development · doi:10.1080/14649880500501179 · Cited by 239
Human Development: Definitions, Critiques, and Related ConceptsPreprint
Alkire, S. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1815263 · Cited by 200
Tornaghi, C. (2016) · Antipode · doi:10.1111/anti.12291 · Cited by 204
“The ability to cultivate and look after the urban soil is also constrained by a number of ‘dis-abilities’ that emerge from a capability justice perspective, as developed by Sen (2005) and Nussbaum (2006).”
BackgroundSen's Capability Approach as a framework to the practice of development
Frediani, A. A. (2010) · Development in Practice · doi:10.1080/09614520903564181 · Cited by 189
“‘A functioning is an achievement of a person: what he or she manages to do or to be, and any such functioning reflects, as it were, a part of the state of that person’ (Sen 2005: 5).”
BackgroundInfluentialSmyth, E., & Vanclay, F. M. (2017) · Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal · doi:10.1080/14615517.2016.1271539 · Cited by 188
“Sen AK. 2005.”
Berghs, M. J., Atkin, K. M., Graham, H. M., Hatton, C., & Thomas, C. (2016) · Public Health Research · doi:10.3310/phr04080 · Cited by 233
“Such an approach argues that, when promoting human development, the focus should be on ‘functioning’ in terms of ‘being and doing’, consistent with what people are able to achieve.(151) This has been hugely influential in social justice(152) and human rights(151) and has been applied to understanding thresholds of dep…”
BackgroundHill, R., Grant, C., George, M., Robinson, C. J., Jackson, S., & Abel, N. (2012) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-04587-170123 · Cited by 262
Klugman, J. (2010) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 177
Simons, G., & Baldwin, D. S. (2021) · International Journal of Social Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/00207640211032259 · Cited by 227
“Supporters of this approach argue that this removes the value judgement that might lead to this determinant being misleadingly reported due to the low expectations of the individual, or society (Robeyns, 2005; Sen, 2005).”
BackgroundImplementing the United Nations Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities
Lang, R., Kett, M. E., Groce, N. E., & Trani, J. (2011) · Alter · doi:10.1016/j.alter.2011.02.004 · Cited by 171
The uses of (digital) literacy
McDougall, J., Readman, M., & Wilkinson, P. N. (2018) · Learning Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2018.1462206 · Cited by 168
“…of literacy ’ (from Hoggart 1957) as opposed to seeing (digital) literacy as an end in itself, and we propose putting such uses in dialogue with Sen ’ s capability approach (2005, 2008), so as to articulate the extent to which digital literacy might offer a bridge from resources to…”
Mustalahti, I. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.132 · Cited by 180
“Based on the argument of Sen (1999, 2005) and Alkire (2007), the conditions and opportunities of human well-being should be defined in a deliberative process that incorporates individual opinions and values.”
BackgroundBurchardt, T., & Vizard, P. (2011) · Journal of Human Development and Capabilities · doi:10.1080/19452829.2011.541790 · Cited by 165
“In an important interpretative interpretation, Sen (2005) argued that whilst many human rights can be captured in the language of capabilities, there are important limitations to this approach, and certain process freedoms (such as a fair trial) cannot be adequately captured in the language of…”
BackgroundDisabilities through the Capability Approach lens
Trani, J., Bakhshi, P., Bellanca, N., Biggeri, M., & Marchetta, F. (2011) · Alter · doi:10.1016/j.alter.2011.04.001 · Cited by 160
“Indeed, as emphasised by Sen, in order to adequately apply the CA, there is a need for public scrutiny and reasoning (Sen, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2009 ).”
MethodThe needs of society: A new understanding of transitions, sustainability and liveability
de Haan, F. J., Ferguson, B. C., Adamowicz, R. C., Johnstone, P., Brown, R. R., & Wong, T. H. F. (2013) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.005 · Cited by 148
Powell, L. (2012) · International Journal of Educational Development · doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2012.01.008 · Cited by 129
“…and functionings where capabilities comprise the opportunities available to a person to live a flourishing life or, stated differently, ‘‘what a person is able to do or be’’ (Sen, 2005, p. 153) and functionings represent what a person actually does and the life that a person actually lives.”
BackgroundHuman rights without human supremacism
Kymlicka, W. (2017) · Canadian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00455091.2017.1386481 · Cited by 146
Cole, M. J., Bailey, R. M., & New, M. G. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1400985111 · Cited by 155
“The term focuses on the opportunities component of justice and supports Rawl’s “Difference Principle” (which promotes propoor distribution of social and economic benefits) as described by Sen (49).”
BackgroundInfluentialSocial Investment after Neoliberalism: Policy Paradigms and Political Platforms
Deeming, C., & Smyth, P. (2014) · Journal of Social Policy · doi:10.1017/s0047279414000828 · Cited by 141
“COAG reforms points to the influence on Australian policymakers of Sen’s work on capabilities (Sen, 2005), and the capabilities approach has also underpinned the Federal Treasury’s economic well-being framework.”
BackgroundDigging Deep for Justice: A Radical Re‐imagination of the Artisanal Gold Mining Sector in Ghana
Tschakert, P. (2009) · Antipode · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00695.x · Cited by 145
Healing the Digital Divide With Digital Inclusion: Enabling Human Capabilities
Fisk, R. P., Gallan, A. S., Joubert, A. M., Beekhuyzen, J., Cheung, L., & Russell‐Bennett, R. (2022) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/10946705221140148 · Cited by 161
“In developing these arguments, we apply Sen ’ s (2005) human capabilities approach and thereby reframe the digital divide as a digital inclusion problem that can be addressed with service inclusion practices.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWhat is Equity in Education? Reflections from the Capability Approach
Unterhalter, E. (2009) · Studies in Philosophy and Education · doi:10.1007/s11217-009-9125-7 · Cited by 137
“Equity from below seems to align with the emphasis in the capability approach on agency and process freedoms and in Sen’s interest in deliberative democracy ( Sen 2005 ).”
BackgroundCritiquing capabilities: The distractions of a beguiling concept
Dean, H. (2009) · Critical Social Policy · doi:10.1177/0261018308101629 · Cited by 233
“Amartya Sen himself has had some ostensible influence on the United Nations Development Programme, contributing to recent Human Development Reports.”
BackgroundOn agency and empowerment in a #MeToo world
Özkazanç‐Pan, B. (2018) · Gender Work and Organization · doi:10.1111/gwao.12311 · Cited by 143
Logue, D. M., & Grimes, M. G. (2019) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3110 · Cited by 149
Rivera, M. A. (2016) · Journal of Destination Marketing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.jdmm.2016.04.002 · Cited by 149
“Capabilities are conceptualized as functional substantive freedoms (e.g. ability to live to old age, engage in economic transactions, or participate in political activities), and are construed in terms of the freedoms people value (Nussbaum, 2003; Sen, 2005).”
BackgroundFinancial self-efficacy: a determinant of financial inclusion
Mindra, R., Moya, M. B., Zuze, T. L., & Kodongo, O. (2017) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/ijbm-05-2016-0065 · Cited by 131
Towards a Governance Framework for Brain Data
Ienca, M., Fins, J. J., Jox, R. J., Jotterand, F., Vöeneky, S., Andorno, R., Ball, T., Castelluccia, C., Chavarriaga, R., Chneiweiss, H., et al. (2022) · Neuroethics · doi:10.1007/s12152-022-09498-8 · Cited by 157
“For this reason, frameworks such as the capabilities approach [51] can be very helpful to translate the general requirements of human rights into actionable and shared international policy goals that promote human flourishing, human dignity and well-being in the context of brain data processing.”
BackgroundFinancial inclusion through digitalisation of services for well-being
Kanungo, R. P., & Gupta, S. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120721 · Cited by 129
Moral Reasoning Enables Developmental and Societal Change
Killen, M., & Dahl, A. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620964076 · Cited by 128
“Sen (2005) argued that advances in recognition of human rights and capabilities occur, in part, through reasoning within and across communities: “The viability and universality of human rights and of an acceptable specification of capabilities are dependent on their ability to survive open critical…”
BackgroundChildren’s Agency and the Capability Approach: A Conceptual Framework
Ballet, J. J., Biggeri, M., & Comim, F. (2011) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/9780230308374_2 · Cited by 130
Clark, D. A. (2009) · Journal of Human Development and Capabilities · doi:10.1080/14649880802675051 · Cited by 136
A conceptual framework for impact assessment within SLCA
Reitinger, C., Dumke, M., Barosevcic, M., & Hillerbrand, R. (2011) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-011-0265-y · Cited by 117
“But when it comes to comparing the lives of many people, a further aspect of freedom gains importance that cannot be subsumed under the capabilities perspective: the process aspect of freedom (Sen 2005).”
BackgroundInfrastructure investment, the cost of capital, and regulation: an assessment
Helm, D. R. (2009) · Oxford Review of Economic Policy · doi:10.1093/oxrep/grp027 · Cited by 116
Kippax, S. C., Stephenson, N., Parker, R. G., & Aggleton, P. (2013) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2013.301301 · Cited by 115
Corporate social responsibility at the base of the pyramid
Arnold, D., & Valentin, A. (2013) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.012 · Cited by 115
“The capabilities approach is “a species of a human rights approach” and has been employed by the United Nations Development Program in its annual development reports since the 1990s in order to evaluate the attainment of human rights (Nussbaum, 2007: 21; see also Sen, 2005).”
BackgroundMethodCarl, J., Sudeck, G., & Pfeifer, K. (2020) · Journal of Physical Activity and Health · doi:10.1123/jpah.2019-0442 · Cited by 116
Promoting wellness: integrating community and positive psychology
Schueller, S. M. (2009) · Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcop.20334 · Cited by 116
Capabilitarian Sufficiency: Capabilities and Social Justice
Nielsen, L., & Axelsen, D. V. (2016) · Journal of Human Development and Capabilities · doi:10.1080/19452829.2016.1145632 · Cited by 106
“Consequently, as Sen forcefully stresses, “To insist on a ‘fixed forever’ list of capabilities would deny the possibility of progress in social understanding, and also go against the productive role of public discussion, social agitation, and open debates” (Sen 2005, 160).”
BackgroundInfluentialLeßmann, O., & Rauschmayer, F. (2013) · Journal of Human Development and Capabilities · doi:10.1080/19452829.2012.747487 · Cited by 104
Can community-based peer support promote health literacy and reduce inequalities? A realist review
Harris, J., Springett, J., Croot, L., Booth, A., Campbell, F., Thompson, J., Goyder, E., Cleemput, P. V., Wilkins, E., & Yang, Y. (2015) · Public Health Research · doi:10.3310/phr03030 · Cited by 104
“The capabilities approach frames health and well-being as having opportunities to do what a person chooses to do and to be what they value.(105) A central tenet of the model is the concept that people should have the freedom to achieve well-being.”
BackgroundTransformative service research, service design, and social entrepreneurship
Alkire, L., Mooney, C. H., Gur, F. A., Kabadayi, S., Renko, M., & Vink, J. (2019) · Journal of service management · doi:10.1108/josm-05-2019-0139 · Cited by 124
Quality of life, participation and occupational rights: A capabilities perspective
Hammell, K. W. (2015) · Australian Occupational Therapy Journal · doi:10.1111/1440-1630.12183 · Cited by 100
What is a good life? Selecting capabilities to assess women's quality of life in rural Malawi
Greco, G., Skordis, J., Mkandawire, B., & MILLS, A. J. (2015) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.01.042 · Cited by 103
“Sen has deliberately refrained from providing a list of relevant capabilities necessary for policy evaluation, claiming that different capabilities are relevant to different contexts (Sen, 2005).”
BackgroundBiberhofer, P., Lintner, C., Bernhardt, J., & Rieckmann, M. (2018) · The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation · doi:10.1177/1465750318755881 · Cited by 94
Falk, H., Skoog, I. G., Johansson, L. H., Guerchet, M., Mayston, R., Hörder, H., Prince, M. J., & Prina, M. A. (2017) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afx126 · Cited by 90
“Studies suggests that SRH may act as a proxy for other covariates that are known to predict health [1, 3]; it may reflect experiential knowledge grounded in both bodily experience and social interaction [35, 36]; it may be associated with serum inflammatory markers [37], or it may reflect perceived declines in health,…”
BackgroundVarieties of Necessity Entrepreneurship – New Insights From Sub Saharan Africa
Weber, C., Faße, A., Haugh, H., & Grote, U. (2022) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/10422587221111737 · Cited by 90
“This assumption also holds for households in poor and resource constrained countries (Sen, 1988; 2005; see also Barrett et al., 2001).”
BackgroundInfluentialCan capabilities be self-reported? A think aloud study
Al‐Janabi, H., Keeley, T., Mitchell, P. M., & Coast, J. (2013) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.03.035 · Cited by 89
“What constitutes an important capability is open to debate, and is potentially dependent on the context (Sen, 2005).”
Serendipity as an emerging design principle of the infosphere: challenges and opportunities
Reviglio, U. (2019) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-018-9496-y · Cited by 105
“2 Thus, serendipity has to be considered also as a capability (de Rond 2014), intended as being capable of making use of the opportunities that the environment provides (Sen 2005).”
BackgroundEngström, M. S., Leksell, J. K., Johansson, U., & Guðbjörnsdóttir, S. (2016) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010249 · Cited by 87
Social exclusion and inequality in higher education in China: A capability perspective
Wang, L. (2010) · International Journal of Educational Development · doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2010.08.002 · Cited by 87
Is There A Universal Right To Higher Education?
McCowan, T. (2012) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/00071005.2011.648605 · Cited by 86
“(Sen, 2004, p. 390) Furthermore, Sen sees them as emerging from collective discussions, with their plausibility ‘dependent on their ability to survive and flourish when they encounter unobstructed discussion and scrutiny’ (Sen, 2005, p. 160).”
BackgroundCan social research paradigms justify the diversity of approaches to social life cycle assessment?
Iofrıda, N., Luca, A. I. D., Strano, A., & Gulısano, G. (2016) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-016-1206-6 · Cited by 88
“The capacities/capabilities approach has been proposed by Reitinger et al. (2011), and, referring to the works by Sen (2000, 2005), it proposed an impact assessment based on the kind of capabilities (set of alternative lives) that people can freely chose; here, the philosophical perspective of…”
BackgroundMediating Agency and Structure in Sociology: What Role for Conversion Factors?
Hvinden, B., & Halvorsen, R. (2017) · Critical Sociology · doi:10.1177/0896920516684541 · Cited by 85
“In one context, Sen refers to conversion factors by using the term parametric variability in the relationship between the means, on the one hand, and the actual opportunities on the other (Sen, 2005: 154).”
MethodOrganising Concepts of ‘Women’s Empowerment’ for Measurement: A Typology
Gram, L., Morrison, J., & Skordis, J. (2018) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-018-2012-2 · Cited by 96
“A recurring debate in the theory of empowerment is whether empowerment should be defined in terms of ‘direct’ or ‘indirect’ freedom (Iversen 2003; Sen 2005; Alkire 2008).”
BackgroundSteckermeier, L. C. (2020) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-020-02565-8 · Cited by 85
“The CA distinguishes between capabilities and functionings (Nussbaum 2001b, 2002, 2014; Robeyns 2005; Sen 1985, 2001, 2005).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRelational welfare: a socially just response to co-creating health and wellbeing for all
von Heimburg, D., & Ness, O. (2020) · Scandinavian Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1177/1403494820970815 · Cited by 116
Resilience learning and indigenous knowledge of earthquake risk in Indonesia
Kurnio, H., Fekete, A., Naz, F., Norf, C., & Jüpner, R. (2021) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102423 · Cited by 82
Introduction: The Capability Approach and Human Rights
Vizard, P., Fukuda‐Parr, S., & Elson, D. (2011) · Journal of Human Development and Capabilities · doi:10.1080/19452829.2010.541728 · Cited by 81
“The links between the capability approach and human rights are discussed in Sen (2000, 2004b, 2005, 2009).”
BackgroundSubjective Well-Being, Poverty and Ethnicity in South Africa: Insights from an Exploratory Analysis
Neff, D. F. (2006) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-005-5920-x · Cited by 80
“6 In a recent paper Sen (2005) argues that although human capabilities and rights go well with each other (i.e. that many human rights can be regarded as right so certain capabilities) the capability framework does not encompass the human rights approach in the sense that human rights cannot be…”
BackgroundGiovanola, B. (2009) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0126-9 · Cited by 84
“…commitment is strictly connected with a person’s moral principles and can also diverge from personal wellbeing: it can modify a person’s goals and his or her rational choice, by giving importance to other people’s aims that cannot be included in the pursuit of personal interest (Sen, 2005b, p. 7).”
BackgroundTrani, J., & Cannings, T. I. (2013) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.03.005 · Cited by 78
From Primary Goods to Capabilities
Nelson, E. (2008) · Political Theory · doi:10.1177/0090591707310088 · Cited by 76
The living wage: Theoretical integration and an applied research agenda
Carr, S. C., Parker, J., Arrowsmith, J., & Watters, P. (2015) · International Labour Review · doi:10.1111/j.1564-913x.2015.00029.x · Cited by 82
Building globally relevant occupational therapy from the strength of our diversity
Hammell, K. W. (2018) · World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin · doi:10.1080/14473828.2018.1529480 · Cited by 86
“Moreover, assessments of self-care abilities are of little value unless accompanied by assessments of capabilities: whether people have the opportunities to use their abilities to do what they value doing (Sen, 1999, 2005).”
BackgroundLabour Markets, Institutions and Inequality
Berg, J. (2015) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781784712105 · Cited by 76
Raza, A., Zhong, M., Akuh, R., & Safdar, M. (2023) · Case Studies on Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.cstp.2023.100956 · Cited by 75
Silva, J. A., & Mosimane, A. (2014) · Human Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10745-014-9645-9 · Cited by 77
“Broad conceptualizations of development as the expansion of people’s real opportunities to be able to do or be what they have reason to value (Sen 2005) illustrate the importance of non-monetary elements of well-being.”
BackgroundInfluentialFrom justice in planning toward planning for justice: A capability approach
Basta, C. (2015) · Planning Theory · doi:10.1177/1473095215571399 · Cited by 79
“Amartya Sen, capability approach, John Rawls, primary goods, public reasoning Introduction: justice in planning or planning for justice?”
BackgroundFour conceptions of linguistic disadvantage
Shorten, A. (2016) · Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development · doi:10.1080/01434632.2016.1192174 · Cited by 82
Living wages, decent work, and need satisfaction: an integrated perspective
Seubert, C., Seubert, L., & Glaser, J. (2021) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2021.1966094 · Cited by 91
Coast, J. (2014) · Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research · doi:10.1586/14737167.2014.914436 · Cited by 71
“Nussbaum recommends developing a single set of capabilities that are important in all situations [46], while Sen and his supporters indicate that they do not endorse the approach of a single list [49,57,58], with Alkire suggesting that ‘no one set will do for every evaluation’ (Alkire, p.”
BackgroundHick, R., & Burchardt, T. (2017) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199914050.013.5 · Cited by 70
Right to water and access to water: an assessment
Anand, P. B. (2007) · Journal of International Development · doi:10.1002/jid.1386 · Cited by 70
Expanding the capabilities of people with disabilities in disaster risk reduction
Ton, K. T., Gaillard, J., Adamson, C. E., Akgüngör, Ç., & Ho, H. T. (2018) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.11.002 · Cited by 69
Assessing mental health literacy of primary health care workers in Kenya: a cross-sectional survey
Marangu, E., Mansouri, F., Sands, N., Ndetei, D. M., Muriithi, P., Wynter, K. H., & Rawson, H. A. (2021) · International Journal of Mental Health Systems · doi:10.1186/s13033-021-00481-z · Cited by 69
“Successful implementation of strategies such as mhGAP in LMICs can be enhanced by adopting Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach [10, 11].”
MethodGuichard, J. (2022) · Australian Journal of Career Development · doi:10.1177/10384162221090815 · Cited by 69
“As we know, Amartya Sen defines “capability” as “the opportunity to achieve valuable combinations of human functionings—what a person is able to do or be” (Sen, 2005, p. 153).”
BackgroundMuffels, R. J. A., & Headey, B. (2011) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-011-9978-3 · Cited by 69
“…capital people possess: • Economic capital pertaining to wealth, human capital endowments and skills (Becker 1975) • Social capital (Putnam 2000, 2005) pertaining to the level of trust in other people and the social networks people are involved in, indicated by the frequency of contact with…”
BackgroundThe Child's Right to Development
Peleg, N. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316146804 · Cited by 71
Scherer, M. R., Weightman, M. M., Radomski, M. V., Davidson, L., & McCulloch, K. L. (2013) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20120143 · Cited by 73
Hammell, K. R. W. (2016) · Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.1177/0008417416654501 · Cited by 68
“…engagement in terms of capabilities encourages occupational therapists and scientists to focus not solely on whether people have the abilities to do the things they would value doing but on whether their circumstances actually allow them to choose and to do what they would like to do (Sen, 2005).”
BackgroundA grand challenge: Providing benefits of clinical genetics to those in need
Hawkins, A. K., & Hayden, M. R. (2011) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1097/gim.0b013e31820c056e · Cited by 67
Negative capability? Measuring the unmeasurable in education
Unterhalter, E. (2016) · Comparative Education · doi:10.1080/03050068.2017.1254945 · Cited by 67
“But the problem with list-based approaches, as Sen (2005), generator of one of the most famous of such approaches, the HDI, acknowledges is that the areas on the list and the weights given are always arbitrary.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Sen, A.
- Corresponding author
- Sen, Amartya
- ORCID
- Sen, Amartya
- Venue
- Journal of Human Development
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 151-166
- ISSN
- 1464-9888 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-9516
- OpenAlex
- W2096196718
- Semantic Scholar
- 311a84649880fb6eb22f842a46b1f98bee415a2a
- Cited by
- 1,966
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 83 · 2025: 113 · 2024: 147 · 2023: 131 · 2022: 158 · 2021: 157 · 2020: 187 · 2019: 142 · 2018: 132 · 2017: 110 · 2016: 107 · 2015: 85 · 2014: 95 · 2013: 90 · 2012: 53
- FWCI
- 103.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Human Development (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Università degli Studi di Pavia
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Philosophy and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Human Rights and Development
- Social Sciences › Law › Legal Rights and Human Rights
- Keywords
- human rights, capability approach, John Rawls, public reasoning, impartial spectator
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review