Cited by 214Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTreatment of Major DepressionMedicinal Plant Extracts Effects

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 132 of the 132 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pharmacotherapy for generalized anxiety disorder in adult and pediatric patients: an evidence-based treatment review

Open access
Strawn, Jeffrey R., Geracioti, Laura, Rajdev, Neil, Clemenza, Kelly, Levine, Amir·2018·Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) often begins during adolescence or early adulthood and persists throughout the lifespan. Randomized controlled trials support the efficacy of selective serotonin and selective serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs and SNRIs, respectively), as well as benzodiazepines, azapirones, anti-adrenergic medications, melatonin analogs, second-generation antipsychotics, kava, and lavender oil in GAD. However, psychopharmacologic treatment selection requires clinicians to consider multiple factors, including age, co-morbidity, and prior treatment. Areas covered: The authors review the literature concerning pharmacotherapy for pediatric and adult patients with GAD with specific commentary on the efficacy and tolerability of selected agents in these age groups. The authors describe an algorithmic approach to the pediatric and adult patient with GAD and highlight considerations for the use of selected medications in these patients. Expert opinion: In adults with GAD, SSRIs and SNRIs represent the first-line psychopharmacologic treatment while second-line pharmacotherapies include buspirone, benzodiazepines, SGAs, and pregabalin. In pediatric patients with GAD, SSRIs should be considered the first line pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy enhances antidepressant response.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14656566.2018.1491966

Cites

132 of 132 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 131 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Nutt DJ, 2001, J. Clin. Psychiatry, 15
  2. 10.3109/10401230590932326 · DOI
  3. Beach SR, 2014, J. Clin. Psychiatry, 75(5):e441-9
  4. Sheehan DV, 2001, J. Clin. Psychiatry, 62, 26
  5. Orsolini L, 2016, Expert Rev. Neurother, 16(5):483–495
  6. Findling RL, 2017, J. Child Adolesc. Psychopharmacol
  7. Goddarda W, 2001, Arch. Gen. Psychiatry
  8. Seedat S, 2004, J. Clin. Psychiatry, 65, 244
  9. Feighner JP, 1999, J. Clin. Psychiatry, 4
  10. Hoehn-Saric R, 1988, J. Clin. Psychiatry, 49, 293
  11. Chessick CA, 2006, Cochrane Database Syst. Rev, CD006115
  12. Guaiana G, 2010, Cochrane Database Syst. Rev
  13. Schaller JL, 2004, MedGenMed, 6, 8
  14. Schwartz TL, 2002, Psychopharmacol. Bull, 36, 53
  15. Kassahun K, 1997, Drug Metab. Dispos, 25, 81
  16. Guy W, 1976, ECDEU Assess. Man, 217
  17. Lieberman JA, 2004, Am Psychiatr Publishing Textbook, 487
  18. Hoge EA, 2008, CNS Spectr, 13(6):522–527
  19. Möller HJ, Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci
  20. Pittler MH, Cochrane Database Syst. Rev
  21. Wang Z, 2017, JAMA Pediatr, 171
  22. Cipriani A, 2016, Lancet

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 213

Metadata

Authors
Strawn, J. R., Geracioti, L., Rajdev, N., Clemenza, K., & Levine, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Strawn, Jeffrey R.
Venue
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy
Published
2018-07-03
Volume
19
Issue
10
Pages
1057-1070
ISSN
  • 1465-6566 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-7666
OpenAlex
W2884641336
Cited by
214
References
131
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH106037)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plant Extracts Effects
Keywords
generalized anxiety disorder, pharmacotherapy, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, benzodiazepines, buspirone, atypical antipsychotics, pregabalin, kava, lavender essential oil, childhood anxiety, adult anxiety, treatment selection algorithm, treatment efficacy and tolerability, psychotherapy
MeSH terms
Serotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors, Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Humans, Monoamine Oxidase Inhibitors, Antipsychotic Agents, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Evidence-Based Practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review