Cited by 159Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesCrime Patterns and InterventionsAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The share of violence attributable to drinking

Room, R., Rossow, I.·2001·Journal of Substance Use

Abstract

While analysts have differed on whether alcohol causes crime, the differences primarily reflect varying definitions of causation. At a population level, more drinking tends to lead to more violence, and less drinking to less. Estimates of the fraction of violence attributable to alcohol have been based both on individual-level and on population-level data. At the individual level, there seem to be cultural differences in the proportion of violent episodes involving drinking, although it is difficult to determine what proportion of these episodes should be attributed to alcohol. At the aggregate level, there are clear variations between different drinking cultures in the fraction of violence attributable to drinking, with the proportion higher in northern and eastern than in southern Europe. These cultural differences underline that there is no single invariant attributable fraction for alcohol's role in violence. The advantages and disadvantages of further individual- and aggregate-level studies are discussed. Suggestions are made for future lines of research on the connection between drinking and violence.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/146598901753325048

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Bell DD, 1986, Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 3208B
  2. Cole P, 1971, British Journal of the Society of Preventive Medicine, 25, 242
  3. English DR, Holman CDJ, Mihie E, Winter MG, Hulse GK, Codde JP et al. (1995) The Quantification of Drug Caused Morbidity and Mortality in Australia, 1995 Edition. Two volumes. Commonwealth Department of Human Services and Health: Canberra.
  4. Friend R, 1993, Dissertation Abstracts Interna-tional, 54, 1095B
  5. Levin ML, 1953, Acta Unio International Contra Cancrum, 9, 531
  6. Norström T, 1993, Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 10, 311
  7. Room R, 1995, Addiction, 90, 499, 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1995.tb02185.x · DOI
  8. Rossow I, 1996, the impact of drinking patterns and drinking context Addiction, 91, 1641
  9. Shultz JM, 1991, Public Health Reports, 106, 443
  10. Valois RF, 1998, American Journal of Health Behavior, 22, 8

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 159

Metadata

Authors
Room, R., & Rossow, I.
Affiliations
Stockholm University (SE)
Venue
Journal of Substance Use
Published
2001-01
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
218-228
ISSN
  • 1465-9891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-9942
OpenAlex
W2150068387
Cited by
159
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Substance Use (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
alcohol-related violence, attributable fraction, alcohol-related crime, drinking culture, cultural differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review