Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,314

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Post‐feminism and popular culture

McRobbie, Angela·2004·Feminist Media Studies
DOI 10.1080/1468077042000309937
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article presents a series of possible conceptual frames for engaging with what has come to be known as post‐feminism. It understands post‐feminism to refer to an active process by which femini...

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1468077042000309937

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. arnot madeleine david miriam weiner gaby (1999)Closing the Gender GapPolity Press, Cambridge
  2. bauman zygmunt (2000)Liquid ModernityPolity Press, Cambridge
  3. bauman zygmunt (2001)The Individualised SocietyPolity Press, Cambridge
  4. beck ulrich giddens anthony lash scott (1994)Reflexive ModernizationPolity Press, Cambridge
  5. brown wendy, 1997, Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 9, pp. 79–102
  6. brunsdon charlotte, 2004, Cinema Journal
  7. budgeon shelley, 2001, European Journal of Women's Studies, 8, pp. 7–28
  8. butler judith, 1992, Feminists Theorise the Political
  9. butler judith (2000)Antigone's Claim: Kinship Between Life and DeathColumbia University Press, New York
  10. de lauretis teresa (1988)Technologies of Gender: Essays on Theory Film and FictionIndiana University Press, Bloomington, IN · DOI
  11. giddens anthony (1991)Modernity and Self IdentityPolity Press, Cambridge
  12. giddens anthony (1995)Beyond Left and RightPolity Press, Cambridge
  13. giddens anthony (1998)The Third WayPolity Press, Cambridge
  14. gill rosalind, 2003, Feminist Media Studies, 3, pp. 100–106
  15. 10.4324/9780203168332 · DOI · Paper page
  16. mcrobbie angela, 2003, Feminist Review, 73
  17. mohanty chandra t., 1995, The Postcolonial Studies reader
  18. mulvey laura, 1975, Screen, 16, pp. 6–18
  19. rose nikolas (2000)Powers of FreedomCambridge University Press, Cambridge
  20. spivak gayatri, 1988, Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, pp. 271–317
  21. spivak gayatri (1999)A Critique of Postcolonial ReasonHarvard University Press, Cambridge, MA · DOI · Paper page
  22. stuart andrea, 1990, Identity
  23. trinh t. minha (1989)Woman Native OtherIndiana University Press, Bloomington, IN

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
McRobbie, A.
Venue
Feminist Media Studies
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2004-11
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
255-264
ISSN
  • 1468-0777 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-5902
DOI
10.1080/1468077042000309937
OpenAlex
W2076141598
Cited by
1,314
References
2
FWCI
33.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.