“If you let me play”: girls’ empowerment and transgender exclusion in sports
Abstract
This article examines discourses of (cisgender) girls’ empowerment in American sports and the concurrent legislative debates in U.S. politics to exclude trans girls from gender affirming teams. I deploy discourse analysis of Nike advertising featuring sportswomen and girl athletes and the political debates in state governments about transgender inclusion in sports. One discourse relies on affective circulation of hope and positivity generated from the image of the cis white girl while the other draws upon fear and hyperbole to disenfranchise trans athletes. These transmisogynistic legal measures exclude trans girls under the auspice of protecting cis white girl athletes from “biological men” who may hurt them or steal their confidence and opportunities. I argue that there is a strategic connection, or discursive formation, made between cis girls’ empowerment and trans exclusion that is fueled by patriarchal notions of protecting cis girls. This formation works primarily by infantilizing cis white women and adultifying trans girls and cis Black girls. As a result, feel-good representations of cis white girls serve as justification for the persistent subjugation of all women and girls by deflecting the cause of gender inequality away from the cis-white supremacist-patriarchy and onto trans girls—especially those who are Black.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The world is increasingly violent for trans people.
“In an increasingly violent world for trans people, we draw on our theorizing to build recommendations for more inclusive and safer OSS projects for contributors.”
From Paradoxes of Openness: Trans Experiences in Open Source Software (2024) · cites this paper as [71]
The current climate is one of violence and political backlash against trans people.
“especially given the current climate of violence and political backlash against trans people [71, 84].”
From Paradoxes of Openness: Trans Experiences in Open Source Software (2024) · cites this paper as [71]
Cites
No Slam Dunk: Gender, Sport and the Unevenness of Social Change
COOKY, C., & MESSNER, M. A. (2018) · doi:10.2307/j.ctt1t6p7fx · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Paradoxes of Openness: Trans Experiences in Open Source Software
Frluckaj, H., Stevens, N., Howison, J., & Dabbish, L. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3687047 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- McClearen, J.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Corresponding author
- McClearen, Jennifer
- Venue
- Feminist Media Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-03-06
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1361-1375
- ISSN
- 1468-0777 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-5902
- OpenAlex
- W4220842921
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 6.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Feminist Media Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sports, Gender, and Society
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Keywords
- transmisogyny, infantilization, adultification, patriarchy, emotions in politics, gender inequality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review