Cited by 576Climate Change Policy and EconomicsRenewable energy and sustainable power systemsElectric Power System Optimization

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

CO 2 cost pass-through and windfall profits in the power sector

Open access
Sijm, Jos, Neuhoff, Karsten, Chen, Yihsu·2006·Climate Policy

Abstract

In order to cover their CO2 emissions, power companies receive most of the required EU ETS allowances for free. In line with economic theory, these companies pass on the costs of these allowances in the price of electricity. This article analyses the implications of the EU ETS for the power sector, notably the impact of free allocation of CO2 emission allowances on the price of electricity and the profitability of power generation. As well as some theoretical reflections, the article presents empirical and model estimates of CO2 cost pass-through for Germany and The Netherlands, indicating that pass-through rates vary between 60 and 100% of CO2 costs, depending on the carbon intensity of the marginal production unit and various other market- or technology-specific factors. As a result, power companies realize substantial windfall profits, as indicated by the empirical and model estimates presented in the article.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14693062.2006.9685588

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. 10.1016/S1040-6190(02)00316-0 · DOI
  2. Burtraw , D. , Palmer , K. and Kahn , D. 2005 . Allocation of CO2 Emissions Allowances in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Cap-and-Trade Program., RFF Discussion Papers 05 – 25 .
  3. EC . 2005 . Further Guidance on Allocation Plans for the 2008 to 2012 Trading Period of the EU Emission Trading Scheme. Brussels : European Commission .
  4. Frontier Economics . 2006 . CO2 Trading and its Influence on Electricity Markets.Final report to DTe London : Frontier Economics Ltd .
  5. IPA Energy Consulting . 2005 . Implications of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme for the UK Power Generation Sector, report to UK Department of Trade and Industry .
  6. Muesgens , F. and Neuhoff , K. 2006 . Modelling Dynamic Constraints in Electricity Markets and the Costs of Uncertain Wind Output. EPRG WP 05/14.
  7. 10.1080/14693062.2006.9685589 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Reinaud , J. 2003 . Emissions Trading and its Possible Impacts on Investment Decisions in the Power Sector. IEA Information Paper Paris
  9. Reinaud , J. 2005 . Industrial Competitiveness under the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme. IEA Information Paper Paris
  10. Sijm , J. , Bakker , S. , Chen , Y. , Harmsen , H. and Lise , W. 2005 . CO2 Price Dynamics: The Implications of EU Emissions Trading for the Price of Electricity. ECN-C–05–081 Petten , , The Netherlands : Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands .
  11. Sijm , J. , Chen , Y. , ten Donkelaar , M. , Hers , S. and Scheepers , M. 2006 . CO2 Price Dynamics: A Follow-up Analysis of the Implications of EU Emissions Trading for the Price of Electricity, ECN-C–06–015 Petten , , The Netherlands : Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands .
  12. Stewart , M. and Wallis , K. 1981 . Introductory Econometrics, , 2nd edition Oxford : Basil Blackwell .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 527

Metadata

Authors
Sijm, J., Neuhoff, K., & Chen, Y.
Affiliations
  • Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands (NL)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Climate Policy
Published
2006-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
49-72
ISSN
  • 1469-3062 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-7457
OpenAlex
W2040126491
Cited by
576
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 30
FWCI
85.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Climate Policy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • TNO Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Repository hosted by TU Delft Library (TU Delft) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Changchun University of Science and Technology
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Power System Optimization
Keywords
EU Emissions Trading System, free allocation of emission allowances, windfall profits, electricity prices, carbon intensity, electric utilities, Germany, Netherlands

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review