Cited by 134Climate Change Policy and EconomicsClimate Change Communication and PerceptionEnvironmental Education and Sustainability

Cooperation in the Climate Commons

Open access
Carattini, Stefano, Levin, Simon, Tavoni, Alessandro·2019·Review of Environmental Economics and Policy

Abstract

Climate change is a global externality that has proven difficult to address through formal institutions alone due to the public good properties of climate change mitigation and the lack of a supranational institution for enforcing global treaties. Given these circumstances, which are arguably the most challenging for international cooperation, commitment problems and free-riding incentives for countries to delay costly mitigation efforts are major obstacles to effective environmental agreements. Starting from this premise, we examine domestic mitigation efforts, with the goal of assessing the extent to which the willingness of individuals to contribute voluntarily to the public good of climate mitigation could be scaled up to the global level. Although individual environmental actions are clearly insufficient for achieving ambitious global mitigation targets, we argue that they are nevertheless initial and essential steps in the right direction. In fact, individual and community efforts may be particularly important if local interventions encourage shifts in norms and behaviors that favor large-scale transformations. With this in mind, we discuss the importance of the visibility of norms and the role of beliefs when such visibility is lacking and their implications for leveraging cooperative behavior to increase climate mitigation efforts locally and globally.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/reep/rez009

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It remains unknown whether human social dynamics will yield rapid and effective collective behavioral responses to global challenges.

    “yet it remains unknown whether human social dynamics will yield such responses”

    From Stewardship of global collective behavior (2021) · cites this paper as [15]

  • Human collective dynamics are critical to the wellbeing of people and ecosystems in the present and will set the stage for how we face global challenges with impacts that will last centuries.

    “Human collective dynamics are critical to the wellbeing of people and ecosystems in the present and will set the stage for how we face global challenges with impacts that will last centuries (14, 15, 64).”

    From Stewardship of global collective behavior (2021) · cites this paper as [15]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 91 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. ----. 2005. The theory of international envi- ronmental agreements. In Handbook of environ- mental economics, vol. 3, ed. K.-G. M€ aler and J. R. Vincent, 1457-1516. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  2. Dixit, A., and S. Levin. 2017. Social creation of pro- social preferences for collective action. In The theory of externalities and public goods: essays in memory of Richard C. Cornes, ed. W. Buchholz and D. Ru ¨bbelke, 127-43. Cham: Springer.
  3. Hadjiyiannis, C., D. _ Iris ¸, and Tabakis, C. 2012. International environmental cooperation under fairness and reciprocity. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy. 12(1).
  4. Mill, J. S. 1836. On the definition of political economy, and on the method of investigation proper to It. London and Westminster Review IV(October):1-29.
  5. United Nations Environment Programme. 2015. Initiatives by non-state actors to curb emissions can help win the fight against climate change -new UN report.. Press release, United Nations Environment Programme.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carattini, S., Levin, S., & Tavoni, A.
Affiliations
  • Georgia State University (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Carattini, Stefano
  • Levin, Simon
  • Tavoni, Alessandro
Venue
Review of Environmental Economics and Policy
Published
2019-07-01
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
227-247
ISSN
  • 1750-6816 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-6824
OpenAlex
W2596136491
Cited by
134
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4
FWCI
17.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Review of Environmental Economics and Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Archive @ GSU (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • COST Action IS1309 “Innovations in Climate Governance
  • INOGOV
  • Swiss National Science Foundation (P2SKP1_165028)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (ES/R009708/1)
  • ESRC Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
Keywords
climate change mitigation, international cooperation, voluntary contributions, free-riding, commitment problem, public goods, international environmental agreements, local climate action, social norms, belief, behavior change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review