The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: A Review and an Agenda
Abstract
This article considers the impact of public opinion on public policy, asking: (1) how much impact it has; (2) how much the impact increases as the salience of issues increases; (3) to what extent the impact of public opinion may be negated by interest groups, social movement organizations, political parties, and elites; (4) whether responsiveness of governments to public opinion has changed over time; and (5) the extent to which our conclusions can be generalized. The source of data is publications published in major journals and included in major literature reviews, systematically coded to record the impact of public opinion on policy. The major findings include: the impact of public opinion is substantial; salience enhances the impact of public opinion; the impact of opinion remains strong even when the activities of political organizations and elites are taken into account; responsiveness appears not to have changed significantly over time; and the extent to which the conclusions can be generalized is limited. Gaps in our knowledge made apparent by the review are addressed in proposals for an agenda for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
Zaller, J. R. (1992) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818691 · Cited by 7,785
Research works printed but not linked: 84
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226012773.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2669364 · DOI · Paper page
- Arnold, R. Douglas, 1990, The Logic of Congressional Action
- 10.2307/2960497 · DOI
- 10.2307/1963169 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1515/9781400822485 · DOI · Paper page
- Blais, André, 1993, American Journal of Political Science, 37, 40, 10.2307/2111523 · DOI · Paper page
- Block, Fred, 1987, Revising State Theory, 1
- Bok, Derek, 1997, Why People Don’t Trust Government
- Brooks, Joel E., 1985, Western Political Quarterly, 38, 250, 10.1177/106591298503800207 · DOI
- Brooks, Joel E., 1987, Journal of Politics, 49, 465, 10.2307/2131309 · doi:10.2307/2131309
- Burstein, Paul, 1991, Annual Review of Sociology, 17, 327, 10.1146/annurev.so.17.080191.001551 · DOI · Paper page
- Burstein, Paul, 1998, Social Movements and American Political Institutions
- Burstein, Paul, 1998, Discrimination, Jobs, and Politics
- Burstein, Paul, 1998, Social Forces, 77, 27, 10.2307/3006009 · DOI
- Burstein, Paul, annual meeting of the American Political Science Association
- 10.1353/sof.2003.0004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/226742 · DOI
- Clemens, Elisabeth S., 1997, The People’s Lobby: Organizational Innovation and the Rise of Interest Group Politics in the United States, 1890-1925
- Dahl, Robert, 1989, Democracy and Its Critics
- 10.2307/1957085 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2095406 · doi:10.2307/2095406
- Domhoff, G. William, 1998, Who Rules America: Power and Politics in the Year 2000
- Downs, Anthony, 1957, An Economic Theory of Democracy
- 10.2307/2110507 · DOI
- Erikson, Robert S., 1993, Statehouse Democracy
- 10.2307/2111707 · DOI · Paper page
- Garrow, David, 1978, Protest at Selma: Martin Luther King, Jr., and the Voting Rights Act of 1965
- 10.2307/2131766 · doi:10.2307/2131766
- 10.1177/106591299905200309 · DOI · Paper page
- Glynn, Carroll J., 1999, Public Opinion
- 10.2307/2657328 · DOI
- Hansen, John Mark, 1991, Gaining Access: Congress and the Farm Lobby, 1919-1981
- 10.2307/2585478 · DOI
- Hartley, Thomas, 1992, American Political Science Review, 86, 905, 10.2307/1964343 · DOI · Paper page
- Haskell, John, 2001, Direct Democracy or Representative Government?
- Hays, Scott P., 1996, Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 26, 41, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a029854 · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a029854
- 10.2307/2095568 · DOI
- 10.2307/2111663 · DOI
- 10.2307/2111758 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/106591299404700207 · doi:10.1177/106591299404700207
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226388533.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1961662 · doi:10.2307/1961662
- 10.7591/9781501736780 · DOI
- Jacobs, Lawrence R., 2000, Politicians Don’t Pander: Political Manipulation and the Loss of Democratic Responsiveness
- Jacobs, Lawrence R., 1997, The Public Perspective, 8, 3
- 10.2307/2669279 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/228282 · doi:10.1086/228282
- Jones, Bryan D., 1994, Reconceiving Decision-Making in Democratic Politics
- 10.1017/CBO9780511622014 · DOI · Paper page
- Kollman, Ken, 1998, Outside Lobbying: Public Opinion and Interest Group Strategies, 10.1515/9780691221472 · DOI · Paper page
- Korpi, Walter, 1989, American Sociological Review, 54, 309, 10.2307/2095608 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/106591290205500104 · DOI
- Lieberson, Stanley, 1992, American Sociological Review, 57, 1, 10.2307/2096141 · DOI
- Lijphart, Arend, 1984, Choosing an Electoral System
- 10.2307/2939043 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2950679 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/974990 · DOI · Paper page
- Markoff, John, 1996, Waves of Democracy: Social Movements and Political Change, 10.4135/9781452234090 · doi:10.4135/9781452234090
- Margolis, Michael, 1989, Manipulating Public Opinion
- McCloskey, Dierdre N., 1998, The Rhetoric of Economics
- 10.1086/297828 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/0022-3816.00011 · DOI
- Mueller, John, 1999, Capitalism, Democracy, and Ralph’s Pretty Good Grocery
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226161174.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1960540 · doi:10.2307/1960540
- 10.1017/S1049096500039834 · doi:10.1017/s1049096500039834
- 10.2307/1956018 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226644806.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2648003 · doi:10.2307/2648003
- 10.2307/2111721 · doi:10.2307/2111721
- Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, 1992, Capitalist Development and Democracy
- 10.2307/2991837 · DOI
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226764658.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1257/jep.15.3.131 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/2082973 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3998/mpub.12845 · DOI · Paper page
- Weissberg, Robert, 1976, Public Opinion and Popular Government
- Wetstein, Matthew E., 1996, Abortion Rates in the United States: The Influence of Public Policy
- Wilson, Graham K., 1990, Interest Groups
- Wittman, Donald A., 1995, The Myth of Democratic Failure
- 10.1017/S0007123400007420 · DOI
- Wright, John R., 1996, Interest Groups & Congress
- Zaller, John R., 1994, Taken by Storm: The Media, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy in the Gulf War
Cited by
What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies
Drews, S., & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2016) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2015.1058240 · Cited by 965
How economic, humanitarian, and religious concerns shape European attitudes toward asylum seekers
Bansak, K., Hainmueller, J., & Hangartner, D. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aag2147 · Cited by 811
Advocacy Organizations in the U.S. Political Process
Andrews, K. T., & Edwards, B. (2004) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110542 · Cited by 474
Social policy responsiveness in developed democracies
Brooks, C., & Manza, J. (2006) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240607100306 · Cited by 358
The Dynamics of State Policy Liberalism, 1936–2014
Caughey, D., & Warshaw, C. (2016) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12219 · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- Burstein, P.
- Venue
- Political Research Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-40
- ISSN
- 1065-9129 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-274X
- OpenAlex
- W2144948315
- Cited by
- 1,438
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 56.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: A Review and an Agenda. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/106591290305600103
- The paper
- Burstein, P. (2003). The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: A Review and an Agenda. Political Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290305600103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.