Cited by 91Organizational Change and LeadershipOrganizational Management and ChangeTeam Dynamics and Performance

Collaboration, trust and innovative change

Hattori, Ruth Ann, Lapidus *, Todd·2004·Journal of Change Management

Abstract

As the twentieth century waned, technology raised the bar of global economics and spawned an era where change and innovation are inextricably linked. This view of organizational change involves examination of the perspectives and behaviors required for innovative change. We present case studies of two organizations that focus on trust and collaboration in their pursuit of innovation. In comparing these organizations, a matrix emerged distinguishing four types of stakeholder relationships for groups working together toward a stated goal. Organizational behavior has been examined through many lenses—in the context of learning for the management of conflict and many other aspects of general development. While these views share some similarities with our own analysis, success in the twenty-first century may demand more than the examination of such factors within the domain of improvement efforts. Instead, we find that the rigorous pursuit of the precursors and enablers of innovative change are unfolding as one requirement for healthy survival within highly competitive business sectors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14697010320001549197

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hattori, R. A., & Lapidus *, T.
Venue
Journal of Change Management
Published
2004-06
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
97-104
ISSN
  • 1469-7017 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-1811
OpenAlex
W2077453853
Cited by
91
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
11.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Change Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Change and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Management and Change
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Keywords
innovative change, organizational change, collaboration, trust, stakeholder relations, organizational behavior, innovation management, organizational survival

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review