Collaboration, trust and innovative change
Abstract
As the twentieth century waned, technology raised the bar of global economics and spawned an era where change and innovation are inextricably linked. This view of organizational change involves examination of the perspectives and behaviors required for innovative change. We present case studies of two organizations that focus on trust and collaboration in their pursuit of innovation. In comparing these organizations, a matrix emerged distinguishing four types of stakeholder relationships for groups working together toward a stated goal. Organizational behavior has been examined through many lenses—in the context of learning for the management of conflict and many other aspects of general development. While these views share some similarities with our own analysis, success in the twenty-first century may demand more than the examination of such factors within the domain of improvement efforts. Instead, we find that the rigorous pursuit of the precursors and enablers of innovative change are unfolding as one requirement for healthy survival within highly competitive business sectors.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Team trust is a critical antecedent of both collaborative culture and team creativity.
“Given that team trust is a critical antecedent of both of these constructs (Hattori & Lapidus, 2004;Evans & Wolf, 2005;DeCusatis, 2008)”
From Antecedents of Team Creativity: An Examination of Team Emotional Intelligence, Team Trust and Collaborative Culture (2010) · cites this paper as Hattori & Lapidus, 2004
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barczak, G., Lassk, F., & Mulki, J. (2010) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00574.x · Cited by 479 · see citing works
Lippert, S. K., & Davis, M. (2006) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/0165551506066042 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hattori, R. A., & Lapidus *, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Change Management
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 97-104
- ISSN
- 1469-7017 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-1811
- OpenAlex
- W2077453853
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 11.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Change Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Change and Leadership
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Management and Change
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Keywords
- innovative change, organizational change, collaboration, trust, stakeholder relations, organizational behavior, innovation management, organizational survival
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review