The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organisational change management: A critical review
Abstract
It can be argued that the successful management of change is crucial to any organisation in order to survive and succeed in the present highly competitive and continuously evolving business environment. However, theories and approaches to change management currently available to academics and practitioners are often contradictory, mostly lacking empirical evidence and supported by unchallenged hypotheses concerning the nature of contemporary organisational change management. The purpose of this article is, therefore, to provide a critical review of some of the main theories and approaches to organisational change management as an important first step towards constructing a new framework for managing change. The article concludes with recommendations for further research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Strategic Management of Corporate Change
Dunphy, D., & Stace, D. (1993) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872679304600801 · Cited by 371
Cited by
Butt, J. (2020) · Designs · doi:10.3390/designs4030017 · Cited by 247
The Physical Environment of the Office: Contemporary and Emerging Issues
Davis, M. C., Leach, D. J., & Clegg, C. W. (2011) · International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2011 · doi:10.1002/9781119992592.ch6 · Cited by 185
HRM institutional entrepreneurship for sustainable business organizations
Ren, S., & Jackson, S. E. (2020) · Human Resource Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100691 · Cited by 175
Kossyva, D., Theriou, G., Aggelidis, V., & Sarigiannidis, L. (2024) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-03-2022-0174 · Cited by 101
Turner, K., Sveticic, J., Almeida-Crasto, A., Gaee-Atefi, T., Green, V., Grice, D., Kelly, P., Krishnaiah, R., Lindsay, L., Mayahle, B., et al. (2021) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0004867420971698 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- By, R. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Change Management
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-12-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 369-380
- ISSN
- 1469-7017 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-1811
- OpenAlex
- W2104285835
- Cited by
- 1,227
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organisational change management: A critical review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/14697010500359250
- The paper
- By, R. T. (2005). Organisational change management: A critical review. Journal of Change Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697010500359250
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
