Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 11

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Solution-focused self-help for improving university students’ well-being

Pakrosnis, Rytis, Cepukiene, Viktorija·2015·Innovations in Education and Teaching International
DOI 10.1080/14703297.2014.930352
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Along with positive developments in psychology, the self-help movement is becoming widespread, based on the belief that people are capable of growing and achieving positive change with only minimal help. This article addresses the potential of a solution-focused self-help tool to improve university students’ well-being by comparing its outcome to a cognitive restructuring self-help tool. The study sample consisted of 173 undergraduate Lithuanian psychology students, assigned to three different study conditions: solution-focused self-reflection (SFSR), cognitive restructuring self-reflection (CRSR) and free observation (FO). Subjective measures of well-being were used twice within a 12-day period. Both intervention groups did better on all applied measures, compared to the FO group. Furthermore, SFSR was found to be superior to the CRSR with regards to the subjective evaluation of the condition of the life area chosen by participants for change as well as the evaluation of usefulness and acceptability of the intervention.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14703297.2014.930352

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. 10.1080/07448481.2010.482436 · DOI
  2. 10.1177/0020764008090843 · DOI
  3. Čepukienė V., 2011, International Journal of Psychology: Biopsychosocial Approach, 9, 123
  4. Davis-McCabe C., 2010, Counselling Psychology Review, 25, 46, 10.53841/bpscpr.2010.25.4.46 · DOI · Paper page
  5. DeJong P., 2008, Interviewing for solutions
  6. Evans N. J., 2010, Student development in college: Theory, research, and practice
  7. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195385724.001.0001 · DOI
  8. 10.1521/jsyt.2012.31.2.21 · DOI
  9. Greenberger D., 1995, Clinician’s guide to mind over mood
  10. 10.1080/87568225.2010.486303 · DOI
  11. Kendal S., 2011, Education and Health, 29, 51
  12. 10.1080/87568225.2010.509223 · DOI
  13. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195385724.001.0001 · DOI
  14. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195385724.001.0001 · DOI
  15. Peck D. F., 2010, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 17, 147, 10.1002/cpp.669 · DOI
  16. Pittaway S., 2009, Mental Health in Family Medicine, 6, 145
  17. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2001.01908.x · DOI
  18. 10.1093/bmb/57.1.133 · DOI
  19. 10.3200/JACH.57.2.173-182 · DOI

Cited by

See all 11

Metadata

Authors
Pakrosnis, R., & Cepukiene, V.
Venue
Innovations in Education and Teaching International
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2014-06-26
Volume
52
Issue
4
Pages
437-447
ISSN
  • 1470-3297
  • 1470-3300
DOI
10.1080/14703297.2014.930352
Cited by
11
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.