The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Negotiating Sociocultural and Institutional Contexts: The Case of Spanish–American Telecollaboration
Abstract
This paper reports on a telecollaborative exchange between university language learners in Spain and the USA and analyses the effects of the different institutional and sociocultural contexts on its development. While the socioinstitutional dimension of German–American exchanges has already benefited from extensive study in the literature, this paper focuses on the particular issues and problems which arise in the Spanish–American context and illustrates the strategies available to teachers in these countries to overcome these constraints. The outcomes of the research carried out here illustrate the need for telecollaborative models of exchange to be adaptable to different contexts of use. Furthermore, the research also underlines the necessity for online exchanges to offer learners the opportunity to explore with their partners the stereotypes and prejudices which each group may hold about the target culture.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A number of recent studies found that the contradictions may also take place because of the misalignment of academic calendars, institutionalized classroom scripts, methods of learning accreditation, academic socialization and technological access (Belz, 2002;Belz & Muller-Hartmann, 2003;O'Dowd, 2005;Thorne, 2003).”
From An activity theory perspective on student-reported contradictions in international telecollaboration (2007) · cites this paper as O'Dowd, 2005
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- 10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00051-2 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0958344001000726a · DOI · Paper page
- Belz J. A., 2002, Language Learning & Technology, 6, 60
- 10.2307/3531955 · DOI
- 10.1111/1540-4781.00179 · DOI
- Brammerts H., 1996, Telecollaboration in Foreign Language Learning, 121
- Candlin C., 2001, English Language Teaching in its Social Context, 1
- Cummins J., 1995, Brave New Schools. Challenging Cultural Literacy through Global Learning Networks
- Donath R., 1997, Das Transatlantische Klassenzimmer
- Fischer G., 1998, E-mail in Foreign Language Teaching. Towards the Creation of Virtual Classrooms
- Furstenberg G., 2001, Language Learning & Technology, 5, 55
- Jones S., 2002, The internet goes to college: How students are living in the future with today's technology.
- Kramsch C., 2002, Language Learning and Teaching in the Age of Globalization, 83
- Meagher M., 1996, Computer-mediated Communication. Linguistic, Social and Cross-cultural Perspectives
- Müller-Hartmann A., 2000, Language Learning and Technology, 4, 129
- Müller-Hartmann A., 2000, Fremdverstehen zwischen Theorie und Praxis, 275
- 10.1017/S0958344000000616 · DOI
- O'Dowd R., 2003, Language Learning and Technology, 7, 118
- 10.1017/S0958344004000424 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511667206.032 · DOI
- 10.3102/0091732X023001001 · DOI
- 10.1525/aeq.1998.29.1.68 · DOI · Paper page
- Warschauer M., 2000, Network-based Language Teaching: Concepts and Practice, 10.1017/CBO9781139524735 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An activity theory perspective on student-reported contradictions in international telecollaboration
Basharina, O. K. (2007) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44105 · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Dowd, R.
- Venue
- Language and Intercultural Communication
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-02-15
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 40-56
- ISSN
- 1470-8477 (ISSN-L)
- 1747-759X
- OpenAlex
- W2132016129
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 26.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Language and Intercultural Communication (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Barnard College
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistic Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Second Language Learning and Teaching
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Keywords
- virtual exchange, sociocultural context, institutional environment, cultural exchange, stereotypes and prejudice, target culture, teacher strategies, online language exchange
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review