The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Innovations in governance
Open accessAbstract
This article explores a special class of innovations - innovations in governance – and develops an analytical schema for characterizing and evaluating them. To date, the innovation literature has focused primarily on the private rather than the public sector, and on innovations which improve organizational performance through product and process innovations rather than public sector innovations which seek to improve social performance through re-organizations of cross-sector decision-making, financing and production systems. On the other hand, the governance literature has focused on social co-ordination but has not drawn on the innovation literature. The article uses four case studies illustratively to argue that innovations in governance deserve greater attention theoretically. Further, it argues that five inter-related characteristics distinguish public sector innovations in governance from private sector product and process innovations. Innovations in governance: go beyond organizational boundaries to create network-based decision-making, financing, decision-making, and production systems; tap new pools of resources; exploit government's capacity to shape private rights and responsibilities; redistribute the right to define and judge value; and should be evaluated in terms of the degree to which they promote justice and the development of a society as well as their efficiency and effectiveness in achieving collectively established goals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,322
Valente, T. W. (2003) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.gim.0000061743.67794.c4 · Cited by 13,723
Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change
Tidd, J., Bessant, J., & Pavitt, K. (1997) · University of Maribor digital library (University of Maribor) · Cited by 4,199
Dewey, J. (1927) · University of Michigan Library Repository · Cited by 4,147
Central Problems in the Management of Innovation
Van de Ven, A. H. (1986) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.32.5.590 · Cited by 3,746
Kooiman, J. (2003) · doi:10.4135/9781446215012 · Cited by 2,656
Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation
Utterback, J. M. (1996) · Cited by 2,483
Michel, V., & American Catholic Philosophical Association, R. N. M. B. P. D. C. (1928) · New Scholasticism · doi:10.5840/newscholas19282253 · Cited by 2,144
Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change
Hayward, G. (1998) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/s0166-4972(98)80033-3 · Cited by 1,856
ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION: REVIEW, CRITIQUE AND SUGGESTED RESEARCH DIRECTIONS*
Wolfe, R. A. (1994) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1994.tb00624.x · Cited by 1,432
Cited by
INNOVATION IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND FUTURE RESEARCH AGENDA
DE VRIES, H., BEKKERS, V., & TUMMERS, L. (2016) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12209 · Cited by 1,214
Designing Public Participation Processes
Bryson, J. M., Quick, K. S., Slotterback, C. S., & Crosby, B. C. (2013) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02678.x · Cited by 626
UNDERSTANDING HYBRIDITY IN PUBLIC ORGANIZATIONS
DENIS, J., FERLIE, E., & VAN GESTEL, N. (2015) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12175 · Cited by 349
What drives the perceived legitimacy of collaborative governance? An experimental study
Lee, S., & Esteve, M. (2023) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2022.2026692 · Cited by 45
Business model canvas to create and capture AI-enabled public value
Fatima, S., Desouza, K., Buck, C., & Fielt, E. (2021) · Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · doi:10.24251/hicss.2021.283 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Moore, M., & Hartley, J.
- Venue
- Public Management Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-20
- ISSN
- 1461-667X (ISSN-L)
- 1471-9037
- 1471-9045
- OpenAlex
- W1983168336
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 34.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Innovations in governance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/14719030701763161
- The paper
- Moore, M., & Hartley, J. (2008). Innovations in governance. Public Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030701763161
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.