Cited by 198Land Use and Ecosystem ServicesSustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisAgronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 108 of the 110 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Examining multi-functionality for crop yield and ecosystem services in five systems of agroecological intensification

Garbach, Kelly, Milder, Jeffrey C., DeClerck, Fabrice A.J., Montenegro de Wit, Maywa, Driscoll, Laura, Gemmill-Herren, Barbara·2017·International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability

Abstract

Agroecological intensification (AEI) integrates ecological principles and biodiversity management into farming systems with the aims of increasing farm productivity, reducing dependency on external inputs, and sustaining or enhancing ecosystem services. This review develops an analytic framework to characterize the fulfilment of these objectives by documenting the co-occurrence of positive, neutral, and negative outcomes for crop yield and nine regulating ecosystem services. We provide an illustrative examination of the framework, evaluating evidence for yield and ecosystem service outcomes across five AEI systems: conservation agriculture, holistic grazing management, organic agriculture, precision agriculture, and system of rice intensification (SRI). We reviewed 104 studies containing 245 individual comparisons between AEI and contrasting farming systems. In three of the five AEI systems, conservation agriculture, precision agriculture, and SRI, more than half of reviewed comparisons reported ‘win-win’ outcomes, enhancement of both yield and ecosystem services, or ‘win-neutral’ outcomes relative to contrasting farming systems. The review presents substantial evidence that the five AEI systems can contribute to multi-functional agriculture by increasing ecosystem service provision, or reducing negative externalities associated with agriculture, while maintaining or increasing yields. A framework such as the one presented here can help guide decision-makers considering how best to implement multi-functional agriculture so that both crop yield and ecosystem service delivery can be maintained or increased.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14735903.2016.1174810

Cites

108 of 108 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 110 references

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Barah B., 2009, Agricultural Economics Research and Review, 5, 9
  2. Briske D., 2011, Conservation benefits of rangeland practices: Assessment, recommendations, and knowledge gaps, 21
  3. Cassman K., 2007, Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 22, 83
  4. De Schutter O., 2011, Agroecology and the right to food: Report presented at the 16th session of the United Nations Human Rights Council
  5. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO], 2011, Save and grow: A policymaker’s guide to the sustainable intensification of smallholder crop production
  6. Foresight, 2011, The future of food and farming executive summary
  7. Goldstein W., 2004, Comparisons of conventional, organic and biodynamic methods
  8. Hudson B., 2011, World agricultural landuse change: PRX analysis of official data from UN-FAO & USDA-FAS—Commercial and policy implications
  9. Jaipal P., 2005, Conservation agriculture – IPM issues
  10. Kesavan P., 2010, Current Science, 99, 908
  11. Kremen C., 2002, Fremontia, 30, 41
  12. Lin X., 2009, Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology and Sustainable Development, 1, 44
  13. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment [MEA], 2005, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and human well-being
  14. Narain P., 2005, Prospects and limitations of reduced tillage in arid zone in India Conservation Agriculture: Status & Prospects.
  15. Savory A., 1983, Rangelands, 5, 155
  16. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity [TEEB], 2010, Mainstreaming the economics of nature: A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–196 of 196

Metadata

Authors
Garbach, K., Milder, J. C., DeClerck, F. A. J., Montenegro de Wit, M., Driscoll, L., & Gemmill-Herren, B.
Affiliations
  • Loyola University Chicago (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Alliance Bioversity International - CIAT (IT)
  • Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • World Agroforestry Center, Nairobi, Kenya
Corresponding author
Garbach, Kelly
Venue
International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability
Published
2016-04-28
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
11-28
ISSN
  • 1473-5903 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-762X
OpenAlex
W2342557752
Cited by
198
References
110
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 3
FWCI
12.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability (publishedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  • CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Keywords
agroecological intensification, multifunctionality, crop yield, ecosystem services, regulating services, conservation agriculture, organic farming, precision agriculture, System of Rice Intensification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review