Cited by 12

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Minocycline for the management of multiple sclerosis: repositioning potential, opportunities, and challenges

Chauhan, Prerna, Kakkar, Ashish Kumar, Singh, Harmanjit, Gautam, C. S.·2021·Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics

Abstract

Introduction Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic demyelinating inflammatory disorder with variable clinical and pathologic characteristics reflecting multiple underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms. Repositioning of existing drugs for the new indications offers several advantages including significant reduction in the cost and time of drug development and exemption from early phase clinical trials. Minocycline has been reported to exhibit immunomodulation in several pre-clinical and clinical studies through suppression of migratory inflammatory cells, modulation of peripheral immune response, and inhibition of microglial activation within the CNS. Areas covered Here, the authors review the repositioning potential of minocycline for the treatment of MS along with appraisal of the evidence obtained from preclinical and clinical research. The authors also discuss the advantages and potential safety concerns related to the use of minocycline for the management of MS. Expert opinion Minocycline offers several distinct advantages in terms of well-known safety profile, lower cost of therapy, widespread availability, and being available as an oral formulation. The authors call upon the public and private funders to facilitate well designed and adequately powered randomized clinical trials that can provide conclusive evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of minocycline in patients with MS.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14737175.2020.1838276

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 82

  1. 10.1177/1352458517694432 · DOI
  2. 10.1093/brain/124.11.2203 · DOI
  3. 10.4103/1673-5374.165287 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0165-5728(96)00179-8 · DOI
  5. 10.4103/1673-5374.195274 · DOI
  6. 10.1212/WNL.46.4.907 · DOI
  7. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000560 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1038/ni0901-762 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s40120-019-0141-4 · DOI
  10. 10.1002/ana.25119 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.jns.2013.05.010 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.4103/1673-5374.169636 · DOI
  13. 10.4172/2329-9096.1000348 · DOI
  14. 10.1177/1756285612450936 · DOI
  15. 10.1177/1756285608095831 · DOI
  16. 10.4103/1673-5374.235242 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2018.04.023 · DOI
  18. 10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_228_19 · DOI
  19. 10.1177/1352458508099482 · DOI
  20. 10.1093/brain/121.12.2327 · DOI
  21. 10.1172/JCI117578 · DOI
  22. 10.17925/ENR.2012.07.03.189 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.06.005 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0074-7742(07)79005-0 · DOI
  25. 10.2741/1883 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.nbd.2004.07.012 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/j.jns.2006.11.021 · DOI
  28. 10.1093/brain/awf133 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/neup.12039 · DOI
  30. Fan R, 2007, J Neurosci Res, 7, 3057
  31. 10.1002/ana.24009 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2014.06.001 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.nbd.2006.10.022 · DOI
  34. 10.1056/NEJMoa1608889 · DOI
  35. 10.1073/pnas.251341998 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1038/77528 · DOI
  37. 10.1006/nbdi.2002.0487 · DOI
  38. 10.3389/fpsyt.2010.00136 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.7573/dic.212553 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1159/000285514 · DOI
  41. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04918.x · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.09.040 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2011.04.006 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2010.05.039 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2004.09.006 · DOI
  46. 10.1177/1352458517728811 · DOI
  47. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-08-02580.2001 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.04.053 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181f3a5b1 · DOI
  50. Filippo M, 2016, Sci Rep, 6, 1, 10.1038/s41598-016-0001-8 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1016/j.bbi.2016.11.010 · DOI
  52. 10.1021/pr300428e · DOI
  53. 10.4049/jimmunol.1600436 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2012.04.043 · DOI
  55. 10.1111/jnc.12289 · DOI
  56. 10.1073/pnas.95.26.15769 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1111/j.1365-2249.1995.tb03864.x · DOI
  58. 10.1128/AAC.40.4.934 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/j.nbd.2006.09.008 · DOI
  60. 10.1128/IAI.70.5.2392-2398.2002 · DOI
  61. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2009.02.016 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.01.022 · DOI
  63. 10.1177/1352458509106779 · DOI
  64. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000277487.04281.db · DOI
  65. 10.1001/archneurol.2010.191 · DOI
  66. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2008.04.032 · DOI
  67. 10.1002/ana.20111 · DOI
  68. 10.1177/1352458506070319 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1017/S0317167100008611 · DOI
  70. 10.1111/ene.12953 · DOI
  71. 10.1080/14787210.2020.1782190 · DOI
  72. 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa049 · DOI
  73. 10.2165/00023210-200721060-00005 · DOI
  74. Marchand DK, Butcher R (2004). Minocycline for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and clinically isolated syndrome: a review of clinical effectiveness and guidelines [Internet]. [cited 2020 May 16]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549544/
  75. 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.09.005 · DOI
  76. 10.1093/qjmed/hcx051 · DOI
  77. Nisar MS, 2013, Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol, 6, 159
  78. 10.1101/cshperspect.a025387 · DOI
  79. 10.1136/bmj.39048.540394.BE · DOI
  80. 10.1016/S0049-0172(99)80004-3 · DOI
  81. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.03.013 · DOI
  82. 10.1001/archdermatol.2008.521 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chauhan, P., Kakkar, A. K., Singh, H., & Gautam, C. S.
Venue
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics
Published
2020-11-05
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
35-43
ISSN
  • 1473-7175
  • 1744-8360
Cited by
12
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review