CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 386Education and Technology IntegrationEducation and Digital TechnologiesMathematics Education and Teaching Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A review of pedagogy related to information and communications technology

Open access
Webb, Mary, Cox, Margaret·2004·Technology, Pedagogy and Education
DOI 10.1080/14759390400200183
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This article reviews research on pedagogies associated with the use of information and communications technology (ICT) in primary and secondary schools. We propose a framework for examining pedagogical practices based on an analysis of the nature of pedagogy as revealed in the literature. In the light of this framework we discuss empirical evidence of the use of different types of ICT in different subjects and phases of education. We identify pedagogical issues associated with ICT use and their implications for teachers' pedagogical reasoning and practices. The evidence suggests that new affordances provided by ICT-based learning environments require teachers to undertake more complex pedagogical reasoning than before in their planning and teaching that incorporates knowledge of specific affordances and how these relate to their subject-based teaching objectives as well as the knowledge they have always needed to plan for their students' learning. In addition the research shows that teachers' beliefs about the value of ICT for learning and the nature of successful learning environments are important in teachers' pedagogical reasoning

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14759390400200183

Cites

99 of 99 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Banks F., 1999, Learners and Pedagogy, 89
  2. Barton R., 1997, Using Information Technology Effectively in Teaching and Learning, 63
  3. Beauchamp T., 2003, Servant or Master: the role of the IT coordinator in secondary schools
  4. Comber C., 2002, Learning at Home and School: case studies: a report to the DfES
  5. Connell M. L., 1998, Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 17, 311
  6. Cox M. J., 1993, Impact – an evaluation of the impact of the information technology on children's achievements in primary and secondary schools, 7
  7. Cox M. J., 2004, ICT and Pedagogy: a review of the research literature
  8. Cox M. J., 1993, The Impact Report: an evaluation of the impact of information technology on children's achievements in primary and secondary schools
  9. 2000, Survey of Information and Communications Technology in Schools 2000
  10. 2001, Statistics of Education: survey of information and communications technology in schools 200109/01
  11. 2002, Survey of Information and Communications Technology in Schools 2002
  12. Dori Y. J., 2001, Educational Technology & Society, 4, 61
  13. Dreyfus T., 1991, Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 10, 43
  14. Godwin, S. and Beswetherick, R. Reflections on the Role of Task Structure in Learning the Properties of Quadratic Functions with ICT – a design initiative. Nottingham University. BSRLM Day Conference , pp.43–54. Bristol: BSRLM. British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics
  15. Goldstein, R. and Pratt, D. Michael's Computer Game: a case of open modeling. Utrecht. Twenty Fifth Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics, pp.49–56. Utrecht: International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics in Education.
  16. Haass U., 2001, Case Studies of ICT and School Improvement in Germany. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development/Centre for Educational Research and Innovation ICT Programme ‘ICT and the Quality of Learning’
  17. Hay McBer, 2000, Research into Teacher Effectiveness: a model of teacher effectiveness
  18. Hennessy S., 2003, Pedagogic Strategies for Using ICT to Support Subject Teaching and Learning: an analysis across 15 case studies
  19. Hoyles C., 2001, For the Learning of Mathematics, 21, 33
  20. Jones K., 2002, MicroMath, 18, 18
  21. Kozma R. B., 2003, Technology, Innovation, and Educational Change – a global perspective
  22. Laurillard D., 1994, Teaching and Learning with Interactive Media
  23. McFarlane A., 1995, Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 14, 461
  24. Moseley D., 1999, Effective Pedagogy Using ICT for Literacy and Numeracy in Primary Schools
  25. 2002, Information and Communication Technology in Secondary Schools
  26. 2003, Annual Report of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector of Schools: standards and quality in education 2001/02
  27. Preston C., 2000, Teachers as Innovators: an evaluation of the motivation of teachers to use information and communications technologies
  28. Rogers R., 2001, Survey of Art & Design Resources in Primary and Secondary Schools
  29. Watson D. M.E., 1993, The Impact Report – an evaluation of the impact of the information technology on children's achievements in primary and secondary schools
  30. Webb M. E., 1996, Children Building Models. The Design and Formative Evaluation of Computer Based Modelling Environments for Schools
  31. Whitelock, D., Taylor, J., O'Shea, T. and Scanlon, E. How Students Construct a Shared Understanding of Collisions in Newtonian Mechanics. International Conference on the Learning Sciences, pp.430–441. Charlottesville: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
  32. Wood C., 2001, Teaching ICT, 1, 8
  33. Xin J. F., 1999, Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 61

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 386

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Webb, M., & Cox, M.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Webb, Mary
ORCID
Venue
Technology, Pedagogy and Education
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2004-10
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
235-286
ISSN
  • 0962-029X (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-939X
  • 1747-5139
DOI
10.1080/14759390400200183
OpenAlex
W2002004756
Cited by
386
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 26
FWCI
13.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Technology Pedagogy and Education (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
King's College London
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Digital Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Keywords
information and communication technologies, ICT in education, pedagogical reasoning, teacher beliefs, pedagogical framework, primary and secondary schools, lesson planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review