Cited by 67Bacterial Infections and VaccinesMicrobial infections and disease researchBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing

Emerging experience with meningococcal serogroup B protein vaccines

Open access
Toneatto, Daniela, Pizza, Mariagrazia, Masignani, Vega, Rappuoli, Rino·2017·Expert Review of Vaccines

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The successful development of two broadly protective vaccines targeting Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B (MenB); 4CMenB and rLP2086, is the most significant recent advance in meningococcal disease prevention. Areas covered: Here we review the principles underlying the development of each vaccine and the novel methods used to estimate vaccine coverage. We update clinical and post-licensure experience with 4CMenB and rLP2086. Expert commentary: The immunogenicity and acceptable safety profile of 4CMenB and rLP2086 has been demonstrated in clinical trials. Continuing uncertainties exist around the appropriate age groups to be immunized, the degree and duration of efficacy, and the impact on nasopharyngeal carriage which has implications for strategies to interrupt transmission and maximize herd protection effects. Universal vaccination programs such as those undertaken in Quebec and the United Kingdom are providing important information on these issues. The potential for MenB vaccines to prevent infection by other serogroups appears promising, and the impact of MenB vaccines on other pathogenic neisserial species with similar surface proteins warrants further investigation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14760584.2017.1308828

Cites

141 of 141 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A N. meningitidis serogroup B protein-based vaccine has been developed and use has been shown to limit outbreaks.

    “More recently a N. meningitidis serogroup B protein-based vaccine has been developed and use has been shown to limit outbreaks. [81, 82]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Toneatto, D., Pizza, M., Masignani, V., & Rappuoli, R.
Affiliations
  • GlaxoSmithKline (Italy) (IT)
  • Research & Development, GSK, Siena, Italy
Corresponding author
Rappuoli, Rino
Venue
Expert Review of Vaccines
Published
2017-04-10
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
433-451
ISSN
  • 1476-0584 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-8395
OpenAlex
W2604770723
Cited by
67
References
141
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Expert Review of Vaccines (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA (000)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Keywords
meningococcal serogroup B, Neisseria meningitidis, 4CMenB vaccine, meningococcal disease prevention, vaccine immunogenicity, vaccine safety, nasopharyngeal carriage, herd protection, universal vaccination program
MeSH terms
Carrier State, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Meningococcal Infections, Product Surveillance, Postmarketing, Global Health, Meningococcal Vaccines, Neisseria meningitidis, Serogroup B

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review